Sorry CS1, the post is for you.
sorry this post is for me or is not?
Sorry CS1, the post is for you.
For you of course. When I sent it, it was for me not clear that it is clear to see for whom it is.sorry this post is for me or is not?
again, you are wrong, not fully.For you of course. When I sent it, it was for me not clear that it is clear to see for whom it is.
again Elder = presbyter from the Greek word "presbyters. " Post 141 If you can read I said
" They are mostly the eldest but are mature in the faith. " Being old doesn't make you presbyters.
again Elder = presbyter from the Greek word "presbyters. " Post 141 If you can read I said
" They are mostly the eldest but are mature in the faith. " Being old doesn't make you presbyters.
then move on please lol.I do not understand what you want to say with your post.
You u- turn the words in my mouth. As i recognize. Why?
okI do not mean old men when I speak from eldest. The eldest (presbyters) were a group of determined men who leads the church.
As you find in Titus 1,5
Before anyone could label the source of a claim of an miraculous event, the validity of the event itself must first be proven.This is now a question for you all: On what grounds do you reject Miracles? Because they're from the Devil?
And if they are from the Devil, how would you know?
Also, why do you acknowledge that it's always the Devil but never God?
Before anyone could label the source of a claim of an miraculous event, the validity of the event itself must first be proven.
IOW, the miraculous claim must have really happened before discussing the power behind the event.
Make sense?
Your question is moot since none of it has been proven.Yes of course.
My question was what would be your take after all of that has happened?
Your question is moot since none of it has been proven.
How can we judge if it is of God or not if we don't even know if a supernatural event even happened?
By no means. If God wants miracles, they cannot be hidden. If He does want miracles, let His will be done.Ok so you're taking a hard exit here.
Miracles don't exist.
Ok, thank you.
By no means. If God wants miracles, they cannot be hidden. If He does want miracles, let His will be done.
There is a big difference between claims of miracles and actual miracles.
Let me give you an example.
Donald Trump barely missed being killed by only inches.
Was this event an act of God or an act of Satan?
I will not label it either. Why, because it may have simply been random chance.
You seem to being pushing a false dichotomy.
Bro, slow down.
Let's say that you have a method to verify a miracle. Great.
My question is not the method. My question is what do you do with the Miracle after?
Do you reject it? Do you accept it? Do you think it's from the Devil?
Do you understand what i'm saying?
Good question but still moot.Do you reject it? Do you accept it? Do you think it's from the Devil?
Good question but still moot.
Since people are simply presenting claims without evidence, my thoughts are the claims are without merit and move on.
I would love to witness a miraculous event or even learn of a proven one.
That would be a good question to ponder.
The only one that can heal is God. You can be of great faith and yet, God may or may not heal you. It is up to Him.
You may be in need of healing."Eat this, and you can be just like me", said the weed to the wheat, while trying to feed them a chocolate and candy coated turd, with the letters m&m written on it.
You may be in need of healing.
"Test"???lol
So this means that you don't believe in miracles or you don't understand English.
Because you can't pass your own test to give me an answer.![]()