Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#9,221
Nov 20, 2018
19,834
7,549
113
#9,221
This is Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ choice for VP.
• Fueled George Floyd riots, delayed National Guard deployment
• Called Trump supporters "fascists" after assassination attempt
• Championed extreme trans surgery and abortion laws
• Oversaw $250 million COVID fraud fiasco • Pelosi's yes-man in Congress
• Radical open borders advocate
 
S

Squigglylines

Member
#9,222
Jul 10, 2024
159
23
18
#9,222
studier said:
This is why we need to define or explain our words. Dominionism, for instance means, different things to different people. Honestly, I wouldn't want most or any of these groups in leadership any more than I want the lawless dems in the position.

Having observed the political arena enough over the past several decades while redeeming most of my time studying the Word, IMO we are in an advanced stage of judgment taking place. If I start with Bush Jr., it was evident to me that many were being turned over to their reprobate (of no value) minds. During obama it had advanced to lack of capacity for thought. Now it's pretty much full-blown insanity, madness, with evil in place of good.

IMO this is not man-solvable and we're watching the judgment of God taking place before our eyes. How bad it gets is the question.
Click to expand...

Most any word might have one of many different meanings to different people. What Dominionism actually means to NAR is the definition should really look close at. In Biblical history Israel was given the Law and Judges and Prophets then Kings. There were good Judges and false and there good Kings and bad Kings in that though they rejected their true King and chose rather to have their own leader and definition of Law and Religion.

After Christ came and after the Apostles and the destruction of Jerusalem in around the 300'sAD and Constantine's conversion to Christianity they thought to have an Pope over all the Church and laws of the state. They refer to this as Intergralism not Domionism but regardless of the word they choose to call it it is where a religious leader has dominion over both religion and the government officials. From around the 300'sAD until the Protestant movement the RCC or the Pope anointed kings over kingdoms and ordered kingdoms to war with other kingdoms if one was declared heretic. There's other examples of this in history in Spain,Brazil the Portuguese even Nazi Germany. Regardless of what word it was called Dominionism is where there is a man who is a supreme leader enforcing that religious laws and state laws are the same.

So as in Hebrews 8:7-8 the fault is in "them",not the law itself but them. and so 1500 or so years before Christ and afterwards now 2024 years also there I think is the better example of an definition of dominionism applied by men https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews 8&version=KJV And as for an establishment of another theocracy with an man in charge we already know it's results from the past 3500 years where men have already tried to apply it. Jesus himself said to the disciples that they were not to do this in Mark 10:42-43 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark 10:42-43&version=NKJV
 
S

studier

Well-known member
#9,225
Apr 18, 2024
1,189
233
63
#9,225
Squigglylines said:
What Dominionism actually means to NAR is the definition should really look close at.
Click to expand...
You're probably right. It seems the dominionism/reconstructionism of past decades has become pentecostal dominionism. I'll be as leery of the prophet as I am the pope. Bizarre times...
 
S

Squigglylines

Member
#9,226
Jul 10, 2024
159
23
18
#9,226
studier said:
You're probably right. It seems the dominionism/reconstructionism of past decades has become pentecostal dominionism. I'll be as leery of the prophet as I am the pope. Bizarre times...
Click to expand...
That's the funny part because you use the term Pentecostal deminionism and it's not just exclusive to the Pentecostal denomination. I see people use NAR origin terminology all over the internet such as demoncrat and others which they used long before Trump and MAGA. Having heard their coining of phrases in discussions before catches anyone who was ever exposed to it's ear. Why I say it's funny is because it's a bit too late to be being leery of a movement that's already mingled it's self into the MAGA movement because the vast many of it's followers don't recognize their speech.
 
S

studier

Well-known member
#9,227
Apr 18, 2024
1,189
233
63
#9,227
Squigglylines said:
That's the funny part because you use the term Pentecostal deminionism and it's not just exclusive to the Pentecostal denomination. I see people use NAR origin terminology all over the internet such as demoncrat and others which they used long before Trump and MAGA. Having heard their coining of phrases in discussions before catches anyone who was ever exposed to it's ear. Why I say it's funny is because it's a bit too late to be being leery of a movement that's already mingled it's self into the MAGA movement because the vast many of it's followers don't recognize their speech.
Click to expand...

My last sentence re: prophet and pope is about as much as I care about any of this stuff. It's always the same in that there is a core and then offshoots in many directions, thus the need to ask people to define and explain their terminology so as to try to get to the basics of what they're thinking is.

A couple of excerpts that may explain the phrases I used:

The roots of dominionism are found in the mid-20th century, when Rousas John Rushdoony developed a hermeneutic called Christian reconstructionism. Rushdoony was the son of refugees who fled the Armenian genocide; he became a Presbyterian minister whose views frequently led to conflicts in his own congregation and denomination. Rushdoony went on to found the Chalcedon Foundation to develop and propagate his views on how Christians should live in the world.​
​
Following Rushdoony, a hyper-charismatic movement known as the New Apostolic Reformation picked up on dominionist theology while jettisoning reconstructionism’s goal of Mosaic law. The NAR teaches that prophets and apostles are essential to church governance. In the NAR, apostles and prophets can receive new revelation from God and give that revelation to their followers.​
​
I'd rather be trying to figure out Law than contending with how many false prophets we may have to stone.
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#9,232
Nov 20, 2018
19,834
7,549
113
#9,232
@kylenabecker


BREAKING. Kamala Harris has selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her VP choice. Who is Tim Walz? Let's take a quick look:
• Fueled BLM Riots in 2020
• Rioters looted and wrecked Minneapolis, did not deploy National Guard to avoid angering base
• While crime dropped nationally, MN's went UP
• Change MN state flag to resemble Somalia's
• K*lled old people with Cov*d nursing home scandal
• Walz shut down schools, churches and businesses
• Instituted draconian mask mandates
• Walz oversaw largest COVID fraud scheme in the country, with $250 million+ stolen
• Walz squandered a $17.6 billion budget surplus, raised taxes
• Minnesotans have been fleeing the state
• MN a 'gr**mer friendly' LGBTQIA+ "sanctuary" state
• Pushes youth trans surgery, 'hormone therapy' agenda
• Quality of MN K-12 schools fell to lowest in 30 years
• Soldiers accused Walz of embellishing and selectively omitting facts about his military career
• Fellow soldiers accused him of "quitting" on them
• Got DUI in 1995 going 96mph in a 55 speed zone
• Praises socialism

Kamala's "PERFECT" running mate.
 
S

Squigglylines

Member
#9,233
Jul 10, 2024
159
23
18
#9,233
studier said:
My last sentence re: prophet and pope is about as much as I care about any of this stuff. It's always the same in that there is a core and then offshoots in many directions, thus the need to ask people to define and explain their terminology so as to try to get to the basics of what they're thinking is.

A couple of excerpts that may explain the phrases I used:

The roots of dominionism are found in the mid-20th century, when Rousas John Rushdoony developed a hermeneutic called Christian reconstructionism. Rushdoony was the son of refugees who fled the Armenian genocide; he became a Presbyterian minister whose views frequently led to conflicts in his own congregation and denomination. Rushdoony went on to found the Chalcedon Foundation to develop and propagate his views on how Christians should live in the world.​
​
Following Rushdoony, a hyper-charismatic movement known as the New Apostolic Reformation picked up on dominionist theology while jettisoning reconstructionism’s goal of Mosaic law. The NAR teaches that prophets and apostles are essential to church governance. In the NAR, apostles and prophets can receive new revelation from God and give that revelation to their followers.​
​
I'd rather be trying to figure out Law than contending with how many false prophets we may have to stone.
Click to expand...

I wasn't meaning you personally using the phrases I was meaning Republicans in general,I apologize if you thought I was meaning you personally. I'll try to define/explain the terminology I was referring to. I was meaning in general I see people in the forums repeat the things for instance from Mike Johnson about the Constitution. I think it's because he says things about protecting our Constitutional rights which most of us would agree with. Johnson across his career was lead counsel for Alliance Defense Fund and others acting as council in cases regarding the Constitution. He also is part of the group called Convention of States(Mark Meckler) who want to either completely overhaul or do away with the US Constitution. M, Johnson is also NAR.
 
Nehemiah6

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
#9,234
Jul 18, 2017
25,388
13,430
113
#9,234
cv5 said:
Kamala's "PERFECT" running mate.
Click to expand...
Which was to be expected. So Kamala and Walz think they can waltz into the White house and destroy America (like Minnesota has been destroyed). Thanks for that breakdown of this evildoers evil deeds. And the Bible says that evildoers and seducers shall wax worse and worse. But God spared Trump for a reason, and he needs to trust the Lord completely at this time.
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#9,235
Nov 20, 2018
19,834
7,549
113
#9,235
Squigglylines said:
I wasn't meaning you personally using the phrases I was meaning Republicans in general,I apologize if you thought I was meaning you personally. I'll try to define/explain the terminology I was referring to. I was meaning in general I see people in the forums repeat the things for instance from Mike Johnson about the Constitution. I think it's because he says things about protecting our Constitutional rights which most of us would agree with. Johnson across his career was lead counsel for Alliance Defense Fund and others acting as council in cases regarding the Constitution. He also is part of the group called Convention of States(Mark Meckler) who want to either completely overhaul or do away with the US Constitution. M, Johnson is also NAR.
Click to expand...
That whole kit and kaboodle is awful. Fringe unbiblical nuttery for the most part.
 
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#9,236
Sep 14, 2020
34,099
6,036
113
#9,236
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#9,238
Sep 14, 2020
34,099
6,036
113
#9,238
S

Squigglylines

Member
#9,240
Jul 10, 2024
159
23
18
#9,240
cv5 said:
That whole kit and kaboodle is awful. Fringe unbiblical nuttery for the most part.
Click to expand...

Then again many will agree with their reasoning in rewriting the Constitution because it gives rights to even sodomites. So if they desire sodomy to be a crime or same sex marriage then the Constitution must go or be rewritten to reflect it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.