Yes.
And when Jesus departed thence, two blind men followed him, crying, and saying, Thou son of David, have mercy on us.
And when he was come into the house, the blind men came to him: and Jesus saith unto them, Believe ye that I am able to do this? They said unto him, Yea, Lord.
Then touched he their eyes, saying, According to your faith be it unto you. And their eyes were opened; and Jesus straitly charged them, saying, See that no man know it.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matt.9.27,Matt.9.28,Matt.9.29,Matt.9.30&version=KJV
Thanks, it is interesting that Jesus heals these two blind men and one dumb man and this provokes the Pharisees to say He was casting out demons by the prince of the demons. The chapter begins with Him healing a man sick of the palsy right in front of the Pharisees, then Jesus teaches you can't put new cloth on an old garment.
Now these two blind men that he straitly charged to not make Him known, they went throughout the land and spread his fame in all the land. The Bible commentators cannot explain this, but I think we can look at the fact that they "spread his fame in all that country". How would you do that? Were they traveling preachers? Were they performers? This isn't simply sharing your testimony. For example I could see someone not wanting to on ABC news, or Saturday Night Live.
Obviously this was an exception and not the rule. Jesus healed people in front of others all the time and Jesus told them to tell their testimony to those they knew of the great things God had done for them. But imagine if this were Alex Jones, getting healed by the Lord should not become part of his schtick to boost his ratings. The word for fame means to "blaze abroad" and the word for "spread abroad" is the same word. It is like saying they "blazed Blazed". It is like a video going viral on Youtube.
With many people the problem is they are reluctant to speak or share. But with these two blind men it seems they were more than willing to share anything that might go "viral on youtube".
So then let's go back to this word "see that no man know it". This term "no man" is first used when he charged those cleansed from leprosy to first go to the priests according to the law.
So it seems to me and this is simply a theory, that these two were traveling showmen, charlatans, performers, clowns. Jesus strictly charged them not to make this part of their show but they ignored Him and rather than causing people to come to the Lord as which happened with the woman at the well, their using this miracle caused the Pharisees to say He was casting out demons by the prince of the demons.
A false prophet is not someone who speaks falsehoods. That is a misperception. Balaam was a false prophet and his prophecies are part of the word of God and Daniel used his prophecy to tell the Magi in Babylon what sign they would see in the heavens when Jesus was born. Judas was also a false prophet and yet he had all the same experiences as the other 11 disciples. What made Judas and Balaam false was they were motivated by money. Peter tells us that false prophets will "make merchandise of you".
So what Jesus told these two blind men seems to me very similar to what God told Balaam about not going to Balak. I used to think God told Balaam he could go, but that is not true. He told him "if they come again he could go" but they never came again, instead he took that as a yes and jumped on his donkey.
