Hey Everyone,
Google defines the "Right of Way" as: "The legal right of a pedestrian, vehicle, or ship to proceed with precedence (the right to go first) over others in a particular situation or place."
In the USA, walkers (pedestrians) are often given the right of way (right to go first) in such places as a crosswalk with a "Stop" sign. But if the pedestrian jaywalks (crosses a place in the road with no clear markings to do so,) the vehicles now have the right of way and not the pedestrian.
I've been thinking about this concept as it relates to friendships and relationships.
For example:
* If Beth came from an abusive household and Billy is from a loving Christian family, does Beth have the "right of way" over Billy? Should she expect Bill to be more understanding if she has outbursts of anger and to let it go more often because he had an advantage she doesn't have?
* If Sally is responsible with money, but Sam spends everything he has (and isn't changing,) does Sam have the "right of way" over Sally? Can he expect Sally to pay for things because he says he's "just not good with money"? Should Sally automatically have to be more responsible just because Sam isn't? (I realize this would have to be different if they were married, but let's just say they're only dating.)
* Ronnie is on the spectrum (has autism) and has some things he's very particular about. Does he automatically have the "right of way" over Rachel, who has never been diagnosed as neurodivergent? Should Rachel be expected to go along with whatever special accommodations Ronnie needs?
* And, does it matter if the person has an official diagnosis from a doctor -- or if they've done a diagnosis on themselves?
I've been in all of these situations but the last one was the most recent. I had a longtime online friendship with someone who said right away that they had autism, and so this person would tell me repeatedly that they did not pick up social cues or understand some things about this or that interaction. I tried as hard as I could to be as accommodating as possible, but I eventually felt like I was exhausted from walking on eggshells.
Another online friend, who had known this person several more years than I had, told me, "Oh, didn't you know (that person) diagnosed themself? They've never been to a doctor about it and have never received any kind of official diagnosis -- this person just spent a lot of time studying this and decided it applied to them, and has been telling people that they have autism ever since."
Now, I can certainly understand this. These days, I don't think many people have the money to try to uncover an official diagnosis. I've always wondered if I have this or that myself.
But the part that bothers me is that I'm always assumed to be "normal" or "have all the advantages" -- therefore, the other person in these situations seems to always assume to have the "Right of Way" over me -- and expects me to adjust, work around, and cater to every need they have -- while never asking me about my own.
And I do try to be understanding because of course, in some cases, the other person literally can't help it. But I can only do so much, and the thing is, I've often wondered about what my own diagnosis would be if I went in for "official" testing. I have a family member who is well-acquainted with a particular diagnosis and has said they strongly suspect I have it too, but for me, it's not life-threatening and I seem to manage ok on my own -- so I've just never bothered.
We all know that every friendship or relationship is give and take. And I'm certainly NOT trying to discount anyone who's gone through a lot of things I haven't or struggles with health issues that need special consideration.
But these days, with so many issues, diagnoses, and labels, I find myself struggling with how much of the "right of way" I'm supposed to allow others to have over me, especially when they see themselves as one thing, and me as something that always requires giving more.
I have plenty of my own quirks and "special needs as well", it's just that I often try my best to forgo them in consideration of other people.
Eventually though, my "full" (of it) button goes off to where I can't handle the one-sideness anymore -- and it gets to a point where I would rather choose isolation than accommodation.
And of course -- I'm certainly not perfect in this area -- so God often convicts me of when I have expected too much from others as well.
* How about you?
* When are we allowed to have the "Right of Way" around people who always seem to assume to think it's theirs?
Google defines the "Right of Way" as: "The legal right of a pedestrian, vehicle, or ship to proceed with precedence (the right to go first) over others in a particular situation or place."
In the USA, walkers (pedestrians) are often given the right of way (right to go first) in such places as a crosswalk with a "Stop" sign. But if the pedestrian jaywalks (crosses a place in the road with no clear markings to do so,) the vehicles now have the right of way and not the pedestrian.
I've been thinking about this concept as it relates to friendships and relationships.
For example:
* If Beth came from an abusive household and Billy is from a loving Christian family, does Beth have the "right of way" over Billy? Should she expect Bill to be more understanding if she has outbursts of anger and to let it go more often because he had an advantage she doesn't have?
* If Sally is responsible with money, but Sam spends everything he has (and isn't changing,) does Sam have the "right of way" over Sally? Can he expect Sally to pay for things because he says he's "just not good with money"? Should Sally automatically have to be more responsible just because Sam isn't? (I realize this would have to be different if they were married, but let's just say they're only dating.)
* Ronnie is on the spectrum (has autism) and has some things he's very particular about. Does he automatically have the "right of way" over Rachel, who has never been diagnosed as neurodivergent? Should Rachel be expected to go along with whatever special accommodations Ronnie needs?
* And, does it matter if the person has an official diagnosis from a doctor -- or if they've done a diagnosis on themselves?
I've been in all of these situations but the last one was the most recent. I had a longtime online friendship with someone who said right away that they had autism, and so this person would tell me repeatedly that they did not pick up social cues or understand some things about this or that interaction. I tried as hard as I could to be as accommodating as possible, but I eventually felt like I was exhausted from walking on eggshells.
Another online friend, who had known this person several more years than I had, told me, "Oh, didn't you know (that person) diagnosed themself? They've never been to a doctor about it and have never received any kind of official diagnosis -- this person just spent a lot of time studying this and decided it applied to them, and has been telling people that they have autism ever since."
Now, I can certainly understand this. These days, I don't think many people have the money to try to uncover an official diagnosis. I've always wondered if I have this or that myself.
But the part that bothers me is that I'm always assumed to be "normal" or "have all the advantages" -- therefore, the other person in these situations seems to always assume to have the "Right of Way" over me -- and expects me to adjust, work around, and cater to every need they have -- while never asking me about my own.
And I do try to be understanding because of course, in some cases, the other person literally can't help it. But I can only do so much, and the thing is, I've often wondered about what my own diagnosis would be if I went in for "official" testing. I have a family member who is well-acquainted with a particular diagnosis and has said they strongly suspect I have it too, but for me, it's not life-threatening and I seem to manage ok on my own -- so I've just never bothered.
We all know that every friendship or relationship is give and take. And I'm certainly NOT trying to discount anyone who's gone through a lot of things I haven't or struggles with health issues that need special consideration.
But these days, with so many issues, diagnoses, and labels, I find myself struggling with how much of the "right of way" I'm supposed to allow others to have over me, especially when they see themselves as one thing, and me as something that always requires giving more.
I have plenty of my own quirks and "special needs as well", it's just that I often try my best to forgo them in consideration of other people.
Eventually though, my "full" (of it) button goes off to where I can't handle the one-sideness anymore -- and it gets to a point where I would rather choose isolation than accommodation.
And of course -- I'm certainly not perfect in this area -- so God often convicts me of when I have expected too much from others as well.
* How about you?
* When are we allowed to have the "Right of Way" around people who always seem to assume to think it's theirs?
- 1
- Show all