Studies indicate people in general, men and women, get calmer as they age. They can regulate emotions better, appreciate the important things in life, focus more on the present, etc... This is especially true in marriages but especially not true with single women as they age though. In fact, never-married women tend to only be slightly happier than widowed and divorced women.
With single people, what happens is we accumulate baggage from one failed relationship after another. We also get really comfortable being single (which isn't necessarily a good thing) and we resist changes that a relationship would otherwise command. Men have the luxury of dating younger women who tend to have less baggage. Society is even more forgiving of such age gap relationships. Women on the other hand, do not get the social pass that men do. Women tend to be less interested in dating men significantly younger than them. Of course they exist and they call them things like "cougars", but comparatively, it's not nearly as common. I could understand the appeal of wanting to date someone with less baggage. There are of course a multitude of other factors that people look towards in finding a significant other. I don't want to focus too much on the physical attributes, but studies indicate men find women 19-23 at their peak beauty. The data shows this is true for men of all age types 18 and older. The studies for women tend to vary between 30-35 for men being at their peak beauty.
I just don't understand how it's morally wrong for a man to be attracted to an adult female at the peak of her beauty especially when we consider she is at her prime to carry his children. I'm all ears though.
The problem is, what happens when men are attracted to women at their peak beauty at a young age -- and the woman, as everyone does, grows past that stage?
It seems a lot of people, both men and women, look for someone at their "peak beauty" -- so what happens when that beauty begins to slide downhill? They generally get replaced for shinier, newer model who is also at their "peak." (But again, what happens when that one ages out as well?)
I think the main protest against couples with large age gaps is that you usually don't find a 50-year-old man who is still a virgin and marrying a 20-year-old as his first wife or sex partner.
Now of course, maybe the 20-year-old isn't a virgin either. But what I'm getting at is that he's usually already had at least one wife and kids -- and is replacing his current wife with the 20-year-old -- whereas this may be the 20-year-old's first time ever marrying and/or having children.
So the issue is more than the age gap -- it's about women being replaced once they're past, say, 30 years old and no longer at "peak beauty."
I've often told the story of a guy on a Christian dating site whose profile said "not to waste is his time if you didn't have the body of a model, cheerleader, or gymnast" (these were his exact descriptions and yes, he really did say not to waste his time,) because, "God made men visual," so he saw that as his right to a hot wife.
The one thing I'll give him credit for is that if the picture he posted was real, he was very overweight and had an obvious double chin, so I applaud him for being upfront. But by golly, he was convinced he DESERVED a model-looking wife from God because he was made to appreciate beautiful women!
My inner-thought reply to that was, "If God made men visual, does that mean He made women blind?"
My prayer for this kind of thinking is always that the person will be blessed with someone who has equal demands -- though possibly in different ways. And I do pray that if I meet someone, we can meet a set of standards that will hopefully equal each other out, rather than one demanding things they don't live up to themselves.
The reality that Christian women are facing is that unless they are "at peak beauty" or a "peak age" -- they are completely dismissed as not being suitable for anyone. I've seen this myself in the dating world, though I seem to get both older and younger guys who ask me out (but it's only because people say I look younger than I am.)
And if these women dare to live past that peak beauty or peak age -- they are often replaced when their spouse decides God's "best" for him is someone young and new. On the female side, some women decide God's best for them is a man who makes more money -- and so they replace their husband with someone they see as "a better provider."
Christian or not, just about all of us know someone this has happened to -- or are themselves the someone who's gone through it.
I understand what you're saying about age-gapped relationships. But you have to think of it on the opposite side.
On the male side, if men decide they can be with women half their own wives' age, and other men are ok with that, what about when women who decide they want to be with a man who has twice her current husband's salary?
The men will argue that there's nothing wrong with a man going after a beautiful woman because that's how God made them, and besides, they need a younger woman to have their children. (This argument gets sketchy if the man is say, 50 and up.)
But the women could also argue that God made them to look for the best provider, and a man making $400,000 will surely be a better provider for a family than one making $40,000, right?
It's unfair to either side, but those who feel they can benefit from it will justify their side and feel completely vindicated. However... if the standards shifts against them, that's when people will start to protest.
Everyone likes when the coin toss lands in their favor -- but no one wants to be on the losing side.