Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

lrs68

Active member
Dec 30, 2024
317
110
43
You might wanna read Mat 18:6 of that passage. The "little ones" for whom God is not willing for any to perish are believers. If God was not willing that anyone on this planet should perish, then none would! Everyone would be saved.

Context really does matter.
Or it could be you adding to it in order to make your personal viewpoint be revealed. But if you are reading your Bible (like I do yearly but normally on my own plan and this year doing it according to the Churches plan) I read everything in context and this is it's own verse not attached to what you're trying to claim.

And yes, context is indeed everything.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,479
521
113
“I call the heavens and the earth to witness about you today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Therefore choose life so that you and your descendants may live."
The command proves that man is morally obligated to obey and serve God. It doesn't prove that post-fall man has any spiritual ability to make spiritual/moral choices that run counter to man's evil nature. I proved this in my 8463.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,479
521
113
Or it could be you adding to it in order to make your personal viewpoint be revealed. But if you are reading your Bible (like I do yearly but normally on my own plan and this year doing it according to the Churches plan) I read everything in context and this is it's own verse not attached to what you're trying to claim.

And yes, context is indeed everything.
Jesus in v. 6 QUALIFIED for us who the "little ones" are, whether you like it or not. It's right there in the text. In fact, the passage harmonizes quite nicely with 2Pet 3:9 which FWs also butcher beyond recognition.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,011
432
83
You can have your share in the tree of life and the holy city taken away.

Why do you deny what is written?

"God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city"

It is futile to believe in an idea when the scripture states something else.
How do you interpret this verse? Loss of salvation?.......It's not. It is a loss of eternal blessings. Some will have access to His Garden. Some will not. All believers will inherit eternal life, but not all will inherit all of the eternal blessings.

We run the race/work out our own salvation to glorify Him. We don't run the race/work out our own salvation to gain salvation.
 
Dec 20, 2023
429
192
43
Texas
Ezekiel 18:4 + 32
Here <= link) is an interesting page on the matter of the Book of Life ... and good morning, BillyBob!!!


Matthew 18:3-6
Thanks for the link! Remember the thread about missing emojis? Well mine went away for about a week, then came back with a MS update, so I gave you a thumbs-up:D
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,568
1,041
113
How do you interpret this verse? Loss of salvation?.......It's not. It is a loss of eternal blessings. Some will have access to His Garden. Some will not. All believers will inherit eternal life, but not all will inherit all of the eternal blessings.

We run the race/work out our own salvation to glorify Him. We don't run the race/work out our own salvation to gain salvation.
What happens if you do not bear the fruit?
 
Jul 3, 2015
61,988
30,968
113
No fruit means the tree was bad. And this means the tree was never supernaturally transformed into good, righteous, holy one.
Matthew 7:17-18 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree
cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. So says Jesus. However, it does not work
that way in free will theology. In free will theology, a bad tree produces good fruit.


Luke 6:43-44
No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. / For each tree is known by its own fruit.


John 15:4-5
Remain in Me, and I will remain in you. Just as no branch can bear fruit by itself unless it remains in the vine,
neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in Me. I am the vine and you are the branches. The one who
remains in Me, and I in him, will bear much fruit. For apart from Me you can do nothing.
 
Dec 30, 2024
317
110
43
QUOTE="Rufus, post: 5440322, member: 329516"]The command proves that man is morally obligated to obey and serve God. It doesn't prove that post-fall man has any spiritual ability to make spiritual/moral choices that run counter to man's evil nature. I proved this in my 8463.[/QUOTE]
It proves man has a choice in the matter.

Just as the Old Testament Hebrews were instructed to serve God they still had to make a choice to do it. That is the same as when God awakens us we still have to choose Him now that we know we need Him (hence: Romans 1).
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,479
521
113
QUOTE="Rufus, post: 5440322, member: 329516"]The command proves that man is morally obligated to obey and serve God. It doesn't prove that post-fall man has any spiritual ability to make spiritual/moral choices that run counter to man's evil nature. I proved this in my 8463.
It proves man has a choice in the matter.

Just as the Old Testament Hebrews were instructed to serve God they still had to make a choice to do it. That is the same as when God awakens us we still have to choose Him now that we know we need Him (hence: Romans 1). [/QUOTE]

Yes, it does prove that man has the choice to act according to his evil nature. Just as bad trees cannot bear good fruit, likewise evil hearts cannot make good choices. Furthermore, I have provided BIBLICAL evidence that bible contains commands that were literally impossible for anyone to keep!
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,479
521
113
Inquisitor said:
You can have your share in the tree of life and the holy city taken away.

Why do you deny what is written?

"God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city"

It is futile to believe in an idea when the scripture states something else.

Then Kroog responded with:
How do you interpret this verse? Loss of salvation?.......It's not. It is a loss of eternal blessings. Some will have access to His Garden. Some will not. All believers will inherit eternal life, but not all will inherit all of the eternal blessings.


We run the race/work out our own salvation to glorify Him. We don't run the race/work out our own salvation to gain salvation.
It appears we have a classic example of the blind leading the blind, and we know how that ends, don't we! I don't mean to insult anyone but I'm always astonished on forums like this how many professing Christians don't have the first clue on how to exegete scripture. They either intentionally pervert God's truth in order to propagate their theological agenda or they are simply ignorant of the first principles of sound hermeneutics and consequently are careless in their interpretations. I make no judgment here on which is the case with either of you gentlemen; but in either situation the result is the same: The mark is missed completely due to a lack of understanding of what is actually being said. Both of you gents are wrong. The passage is not teaching that one can lose their salvation, nor is it teaching that in the New Order Christians will lose blessings. And now I'll make my case for why neither of these is true and explain what is really being said.

In your case, Mr. Kroog, your understanding cannot be correct due to what Rev 22:18 teaches. Verse 19 must be understood in the context of the previous verse because in both verses the stern warning pertains to the perversion of God's truth. How can Christians be in view in v.18 since the punishment for adding to God's Word are all the plagues that the ungodly world will suffer? Are we to believe that true Christians will suffer the kinds of plagues described in this book for all eternity? And where are they going to suffer these plagues: in the New Jerusalem on the restored earth or in the lake of fire? Therefore, when come to v. 19, which speaks to the second way God's Word can be corrupted (subtracting from it), it cannot be speaking about Christians either.

And in the Mr. Inquisitor's case, these passages cannot be teaching that Christians can lose their salvation, for that would contradict a large body of scripture that teaches the very opposite thing. Just in the book of Jude alone, that epistle is literally bookended with how Christ (the Good Shepherd) faithfully keeps his Father's chosen ones (Jude 1, 24).

So then...the question begging to be asked: To whom do these two verses apply, if not Church? The verse that immediately precedes v. 18 answer this for us: The verse is actually a Gospel of the Kingdom (Mat 4:23; 9:35; 24:14) invitation given not only by Christ but by His Bride as well! After all, it is his "bride" (the Church) who has been commissioned by Christ to preach the Gospel to all the nations. Therefore, the severe warning that is given in v.18 is given to the ungodly who might entertain the thought of accepting the invitation. In other words, Jesus is basically telling the ungodly world: "Think twice before you accept. Think long and hard. Sit down and count the cost." Jesus is telling them via this warning not to take scripture lightly. The [external] call of the Gospel is a sincere one but you must accept it on my terms! "So, don't try to play cute with me and feign faith and repentance and then turn around and deliberately carelessly, irresponsibly or complacently pervert my words by adding or subtracting to them because if you do, you'll pay a very high price!" When I ponder this passage, I think of all the people caught up in a cult who sincerely believe they are saved. Or for that matter your proverbial Sunday pew warmer, ritual-lover who really has no zeal or love for God or his Christ! Or just a very religious person who has great zeal for his religion or religious tradition but little for God or his Word. In fact, the people Christ will address on the Last Day in Mat 7:23 come immediately to mind. Jesus, by giving this strong and urgent warning, was in fact repeating a command that was stated in the Law of Moses (Deut 4:2) thereby establishing a solid biblical principle that applies to all dispensations.

Having said all that, I still suspect that people will reject this truth because they'll point to what Jesus said in v.19 about God taking away a perverter's share in the "tree of life". It is this phrase which likely threw both of you guys off because you ignored the larger context of the passage,namely v.17. Verse 19 must be understood through the lens of the Gospel invitation in v.17. The unbelieving hearers didn't actually possess a share in the "tree of life" per se because they were never saved to begin with. They never had eternal life, which is what the "tree of life" represents. Therefore, their "share" (or portion or allotment) in the tree of life that God will take away should be understood as meaning the Gospel promise of eternal life that was extended to them. Such perverters of God's Word will "forfeit" their place in the Kingdom and the gift of eternal life, which they could have had if they had truly repented and believed the Gospel and hadn't corrupted God's Word. Instead of inheriting eternal life, they will inherit eternal destruction. These unbelievers will continue to do wrong and continue to be vile (22:10).
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,568
1,041
113
It proves man has a choice in the matter.

Just as the Old Testament Hebrews were instructed to serve God they still had to make a choice to do it. That is the same as when God awakens us we still have to choose Him now that we know we need Him (hence: Romans 1).
Yes, it does prove that man has the choice to act according to his evil nature. Just as bad trees cannot bear good fruit, likewise evil hearts cannot make good choices. Furthermore, I have provided BIBLICAL evidence that bible contains commands that were literally impossible for anyone to keep![/QUOTE]

Israel had good kings and bad kings.

According to your understanding that would be impossible.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,549
7,017
113
62
Yes, it does prove that man has the choice to act according to his evil nature. Just as bad trees cannot bear good fruit, likewise evil hearts cannot make good choices. Furthermore, I have provided BIBLICAL evidence that bible contains commands that were literally impossible for anyone to keep!
Israel had good kings and bad kings.

According to your understanding that would be impossible.[/QUOTE]
Good there is a relative term as only God is truly good.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,568
1,041
113
It appears we have a classic example of the blind leading the blind, and we know how that ends, don't we! I don't mean to insult anyone but I'm always astonished on forums like this how many professing Christians don't have the first clue on how to exegete scripture. They either intentionally pervert God's truth in order to propagate their theological agenda or they are simply ignorant of the first principles of sound hermeneutics and consequently are careless in their interpretations. I make no judgment here on which is the case with either of you gentlemen; but in either situation the result is the same: The mark is missed completely due to a lack of understanding of what is actually being said. Both of you gents are wrong. The passage is not teaching that one can lose their salvation, nor is it teaching that in the New Order Christians will lose blessings. And now I'll make my case for why neither of these is true and explain what is really being said.

In your case, Mr. Kroog, your understanding cannot be correct due to what Rev 22:18 teaches. Verse 19 must be understood in the context of the previous verse because in both verses the stern warning pertains to the perversion of God's truth. How can Christians be in view in v.18 since the punishment for adding to God's Word are all the plagues that the ungodly world will suffer? Are we to believe that true Christians will suffer the kinds of plagues described in this book for all eternity? And where are they going to suffer these plagues: in the New Jerusalem on the restored earth or in the lake of fire? Therefore, when come to v. 19, which speaks to the second way God's Word can be corrupted (subtracting from it), it cannot be speaking about Christians either.

And in the Mr. Inquisitor's case, these passages cannot be teaching that Christians can lose their salvation, for that would contradict a large body of scripture that teaches the very opposite thing. Just in the book of Jude alone, that epistle is literally bookended with how Christ (the Good Shepherd) faithfully keeps his Father's chosen ones (Jude 1, 24).

So then...the question begging to be asked: To whom do these two verses apply, if not Church? The verse that immediately precedes v. 18 answer this for us: The verse is actually a Gospel of the Kingdom (Mat 4:23; 9:35; 24:14) invitation given not only by Christ but by His Bride as well! After all, it is his "bride" (the Church) who has been commissioned by Christ to preach the Gospel to all the nations. Therefore, the severe warning that is given in v.18 is given to the ungodly who might entertain the thought of accepting the invitation. In other words, Jesus is basically telling the ungodly world: "Think twice before you accept. Think long and hard. Sit down and count the cost." Jesus is telling them via this warning not to take scripture lightly. The [external] call of the Gospel is a sincere one but you must accept it on my terms! "So, don't try to play cute with me and feign faith and repentance and then turn around and deliberately carelessly, irresponsibly or complacently pervert my words by adding or subtracting to them because if you do, you'll pay a very high price!" When I ponder this passage, I think of all the people caught up in a cult who sincerely believe they are saved. Or for that matter your proverbial Sunday pew warmer, ritual-lover who really has no zeal or love for God or his Christ! Or just a very religious person who has great zeal for his religion or religious tradition but little for God or his Word. In fact, the people Christ will address on the Last Day in Mat 7:23 come immediately to mind. Jesus, by giving this strong and urgent warning, was in fact repeating a command that was stated in the Law of Moses (Deut 4:2) thereby establishing a solid biblical principle that applies to all dispensations.

Having said all that, I still suspect that people will reject this truth because they'll point to what Jesus said in v.19 about God taking away a perverter's share in the "tree of life". It is this phrase which likely threw both of you guys off because you ignored the larger context of the passage,namely v.17. Verse 19 must be understood through the lens of the Gospel invitation in v.17. The unbelieving hearers didn't actually possess a share in the "tree of life" per se because they were never saved to begin with. They never had eternal life, which is what the "tree of life" represents. Therefore, their "share" (or portion or allotment) in the tree of life that God will take away should be understood as meaning the Gospel promise of eternal life that was extended to them. Such perverters of God's Word will "forfeit" their place in the Kingdom and the gift of eternal life, which they could have had if they had truly repented and believed the Gospel and hadn't corrupted God's Word. Instead of inheriting eternal life, they will inherit eternal destruction. These unbelievers will continue to do wrong and continue to be vile (22:10).
John 15:1-4
I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away,
and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. Already you are clean because of
the word that I have spoken to you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself,
unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me.

How do you read this statement, "Every branch in me that does not bear fruit"?
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,568
1,041
113
Israel had good kings and bad kings.

According to your understanding that would be impossible.
Good there is a relative term as only God is truly good.
You have me making statements that Rufus made?

No one can do good under the heading of "Total Depravity".

Relative or not Cameron, their ways are always evil, so you need to expand on this relativity between good and bad.

It says "Total Depravity".
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,549
7,017
113
62
You have me making statements that Rufus made?

No one can do good under the heading of "Total Depravity".

Relative or not Cameron, their ways are always evil, so you need to expand on this relativity between good and bad.

It says "Total Depravity".
Total depravity doesn't mean what you suppose. Even lousy parents can give good gifts according to Jesus.
Total depravity simply means that all man's faculties were corrupted in the fall, and not that each faculty was corrupted to the uttermost.

A philanthropist can give away millions of dollars that genuinely helps people, but only have done so for the tax breaks and adulation. Their action may appear good, but their motives are selfish.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,988
30,968
113
Total depravity doesn't mean what you suppose. Even lousy parents can give good gifts according to Jesus.
Total depravity simply means that all man's faculties were corrupted in the fall, and not that each faculty was corrupted to the uttermost.

A philanthropist can give away millions of dollars that genuinely helps people, but only have done so for the tax breaks and adulation. Their action may appear good, but their motives are selfish.
Now, now, dear Cameron, you KNOW these free willers must make the natural man =with his heart of stone and hostile-
to-God mind= able to freely choose to believe that which he cannot even comprehend, to produce the fruit of faith...


Even despite Jesus negating the validity of such thinking, they whole heartily embrace it!

Even Jesus saying no one is good but God alone? Nah, to the free willer, Jesus was mistaken.

The natural man is good to go in their theology.