God gave the law about Circumcision.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
888
109
43
People struggle with this passage because they don't believe heaven and earth have passed away. Suppose they have. Would this change your perspective?
The only way to abolish God’s instructions for how to be in His likeness by being a doer of His character traits would be by first abolishing God.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,066
266
83
How can something that was near to disappearing nearly 2000 years ago be eternal?

In that he says, a new [covenant], he has made the first old. Now that which is worn out and grown old [is] near to disappear. Hebrews 8:13
To the second point, any male that wasn't circumcised was cut off from Israel and thereby cutoff from the promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
It's eternal because God said it was eternal. And then Jesus said "until heaven and earth pass away." Whether you think it was near to disappearing doesn't mean that it has disappeared.

And to your 2nd point, Jesus' sacrfice and our faith in His gracious salvation is the sign of our covenant with Him today. A circumcision today isn't necessary, but it isn't wrong in and of itself. Most importantly, if we refuse to accept that salvation through faith, then we truly will be cut off.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,802
7,111
113
62
I'm not too interested in hypotheticals. However, esus also said "until everything has been fulfilled." I don't believe either of those criteria have occured yet.
It's only hypothetical if you believe as you do. And if all the promises of God are in Christ yes and amen, then all the work required on Jesus part is accomplished already. All may not have come to fruition, but He's not coming back to die again. And He sat down at the right hand of the Father, signifying that the work is done. So in this regard, the old patterns in the heavens and earth are passed away.
I can demonstrate this from scripture if you like.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,802
7,111
113
62
The only way to abolish God’s instructions for how to be in His likeness by being a doer of His character traits would be by first abolishing God.
I have absolutely no idea how this relates to what I was saying.
 
Nov 1, 2024
2,080
646
113
It's eternal because God said it was eternal. And then Jesus said "until heaven and earth pass away." Whether you think it was near to disappearing doesn't mean that it has disappeared.

And to your 2nd point, Jesus' sacrfice and our faith in His gracious salvation is the sign of our covenant with Him today. A circumcision today isn't necessary, but it isn't wrong in and of itself. Most importantly, if we refuse to accept that salvation through faith, then we truly will be cut off.
I suggest you study the word olam. It doesn't always mean eternity

H5769 עוֹלָם `owlam (o-lawm') n-m.
עֹלָם `olam (o-lawm')
1. (properly) concealed, i.e. the vanishing point.

True, nothing wrong with getting snipped if that's what you want to do. It is more hygenic.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
The only way to abolish God’s instructions for how to be in His likeness by being a doer of His character traits would be by first abolishing God.
There is no need to abolish what Jesus has made obsolete.
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
888
109
43
I esteem Christ's law above and greater than Moses' law

I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee [Moses], and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require [it] of him. Deuteronomy 18:18-19
That doesn’t interact with what I said and is a moot point because it is the same thing. The same God who gave His law to Moses also sent Jesus in fulfillment of the promise to turn us from our wickedness in disobedience to it (Acts 3:25-26), so there is no disagreement. In Matthew 4:15-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, which was a light to the Gentiles, and the Mosaic Law was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel message. Jesus also set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:6). So Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example and the Law of Christ is not other than or contrary to anything that Christ taught.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,677
1,050
113
A newer covenant doesn’t nullify the promises of covenants that have already been ratified (Galatians 3:16-19), so God’s covenants are cumulative. One thing can only make another thing obsolete insofar as it has cumulative functionality. For example, a computer makes a typewriter obsolete, but doesn’t make a catapult obsolete. The Mosaic Covenant is eternal (Exodus 31:14-17, Leviticus 24:8), so the only way that the New Covenant can be make it obsolete is if it is cumulative with it. So the New Covenant still involves following the Mosaic Law (Hebrews 8:10) plus it is based on better promised and has a superior mediator. The problem that God found with the Mosaic Covenant was not with His law, but with the people for not continuing in their covenant (Hebrews 8:7-9), so the solution to the problem was not for God to do away with His law, but to do away with what was hindering us from obeying it. This is why the New Covenant involves God taking away our hearts of stone, giving us hearts of flesh, and sending His Spirit to lead us in obedience to His law, God sending His Son to free us from sin so that we might be free to meet the righteous requirements of His law (Romans 8:3-4), and God putting His law in our minds and writing it on our hearts (Jeremiah 31:33). God did not establish the New Covenant so that we can be free to have the same disobedience to His law that caused the New Covenant to be needed in the first place.
Hebrews 8:13
When He said, “A new covenant", He has made the first (covenant) obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete
and growing old is ready to disappear.

You cannot deny what the author of Hebrews has declared.

The old covenant, the first covenant with Israel is obsolete.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,677
1,050
113
That doesn’t interact with what I said and is a moot point because it is the same thing. The same God who gave His law to Moses also sent Jesus in fulfillment of the promise to turn us from our wickedness in disobedience to it (Acts 3:25-26), so there is no disagreement. In Matthew 4:15-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, which was a light to the Gentiles, and the Mosaic Law was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel message. Jesus also set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:6). So Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example and the Law of Christ is not other than or contrary to anything that Christ taught.
For Gentiles who were not raised under the law of Moses, do not see transgression of the law as sin.

Paul used a different approach with the Gentiles.

Paul used the term, 'deeds of the flesh', to identify what you would call sin.

Paul is the authority for Gentiles on Christian behavior.

Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles.

Romans 11:13
But I am speaking to you who are Gentiles. Inasmuch then as I am an apostle of Gentiles, I magnify my ministry.

2 Peter 3:14-16
Therefore, beloved, since you look for these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, spotless and blameless,
and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom
given him
, wrote to you, as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things
, in which are some things
hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures,
to their own destruction.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
15,042
6,078
113
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jesus in his 2nd role as The Son of The Living God. he serves as a model;
Whatever Jesus did in his 2nd role as Son of The Living God we should do it too.
1 PETER 2:21
21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:
“For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:

who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

For ye were as sheep going astray;

but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls.”
‭‭1 Peter‬ ‭2:21-25‬ ‭KJV‬‬
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,624
631
113
Romans 2:26
“So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?”
‭‭
That verse notably does notably does not state that a Gentile who has faith will be regarded as circumcision, but one who keeps the law, though the Bible often conflated the two, such as in Revelation 14:12, those who kept faith in Jesus are the same as those who kept God’s commandments. It is contradictory for someone to think that we should have faith in God, but not in His instructions.

God’s way is the way to know Him by being in His likeness through being a doer of His character traits, such as in Genesis 18:19, God knew Abraham that he would teach his children and those of his household to walk in His way by being a doer of righteousness and justice that the Lord might bring to him all that He promised. In Genesis 26:4-5, God will multiply Abraham’s children as the stars in the heavens, to his children He will give all of these lands, and through his children all of the nations of the earth will be blessed because he heard God’s voice and guarded His charge, commandments, statues, and laws. In Deuteronomy 30:16, if the children of Abraham will love God with all of their hearts by walking in God’s way in obedience to His commandments, statues, and laws, then they will live and multiply and God will bless them in the land that they go to possess. So the promise was made to Abraham and brought about because he walked in God’s way in obedience to His law, he taught his children and those of his household to do that, and because they did that. Moreover, in Exodus 33:13, Moses wanted God to be gracious to him by teaching him to walk in His way that he and Israel might know Him. So both Abraham and Moses taught how to know God by walking in His way in obedience to His law.


In 1 Peter 1:16, we are told to be holy for God is holy, which is a quote from Leviticus where God was giving instructions for how to do that. In 1 Peter 2:9-10, Gentiles are included as part of God’s chosen people, a holy nation, a royal priesthood, and a treasure of God’s own possession, which are terms used to describe Israel (Deuteronomy 7:6), so Gentiles also have the delight of getting to obey the instructions that God had given for how to fulfill those roles and holiness is not just for Jews. It would be contradictory for a Gentile to want to live as part of a holy nation while not wanting to follow God’s instructions for how to do that. The only way that we should cease to follow God’s instructions for how be holy as He is holy would be if God were to cease to be holy, and the same goes for God’s other instructions for how to be in His likeness by being a doer of His character traits.

Jesus saves is from our sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of God’s law, so Jesus graciously teaching us to be a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it. If someone doesn’t want to be a doer of God’s law, they they also do not want God’s gift of salvation.
You illustrate the fallacy of proof texting by not even noting the rest of that chapter, indicating that you may belong to the circumcision group Paul warns Christians against in TIT 1:10-11, "There are many rebellious people, mere talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision group. They must be silenced, because they are ruining whole households (churches) by teaching things they ought not to teach."
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
15,042
6,078
113
Hebrews 8:13
When He said, “A new covenant", He has made the first (covenant) obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete
and growing old is ready to disappear.

You cannot deny what the author of Hebrews has declared.

The old covenant, the first covenant with Israel is obsolete.
Amen

Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:”
‭‭Jeremiah‬ ‭31:31-32‬ ‭KJV‬‬

The law and the prophets were until John:

since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.”
‭‭Luke‬ ‭16:16‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the law made nothing perfect,

but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭7:18-19‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭9:15-17‬ ‭KJV‬‬

It’s like a living Will. Until you die the words you had spoken about your possessions doesn’t have any force , it can still be changed. But when the person who made the Will with his words dies , all his words become permanent and binding. That’s what happened with Jesus word when he died it became the New Testament between God and mankind not removing but having fulfilled the old covenant and offered man a better and living way ….

Many put the old and new testaments together but they are two testaments each has its own mediator Moses and Jesus . Its own sacrifices and ways of worship its own blood of atonement animals and Jesus .

It’s own preisthood leviticle order of Aaron and melchezideks line which is Christs preisthood in the nt , each has its own promises and promised land it’s own word from God through the mediator they had Moses word in the ot and then there’s Jesus word in the nt given first to then then to everyone by the believers among them . One covenant wasn’t just forgotten about irs been fulfilled

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭5:17-18‬ ‭KJV‬‬

after he died and rose

“And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.

Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, and said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:

and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.

And ye are witnesses of these things.”
‭‭Luke‬ ‭24:44-48‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Now there’s a lot of new things from Jesus and his apostles that need to be fulfilled and much already has but Each testament has its own prophecy the ot prophecies are fulfilled the nt ones even those originating from the ot aren’t all yet . Two seperate testaments one is fulfilled one is yet to be and still offers the promise
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
In Hebrews 11, it lists examples of people who had saving faith even though they had never read the NT, so that is ultimately unnecessary for salvation.
Hebrews 11 says nothing whatsoever about "saving faith". It discusses "faith"... period.

Paul was a servant of God, so Galatians should not be interpreted in a way that turns it against obeying what God has commanded.
Unless, of course, there is no other rational way to interpret it, which means that's exactly what God was saying through Paul.

Which, of course, is actually what He was doing. He was saying that our relationship with Him is not established by our obedience of the Law, and that obedience to the Law adds nothing. Our relationship with God is wholly and completely through faith in Jesus Christ. We are not in sin because our relationship with God is not through the mediation of the law.

As God says through Paul: "The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”"
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
If you have such a poor view of God’s law that you consider it to be bondage, then you also have an equally poor view of God for giving it.
That's just silly. Firstly, it is an insulting assumption on your part, and a similarly insulting insinuation.

Discuss the Scripture, and disagree if you like, but don't be a jackdonkey in doing so.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
Jesus saves is from our sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of God’s law, so Jesus graciously teaching us to be a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it.
That is such a complete misrepresentation of the finished work of Christ. I honestly don't think you understand what it means to be a Christian.

Jesus saves us from the penalty of sin, which is death (the second death). He died in our place.

God (through Peter) makes clear the issue in Acts 15:

5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”

6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”

You are agreeing with the Pharisees, and are clearly wrong.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
A newer covenant doesn’t nullify the promises of covenants that have already been ratified (Galatians 3:16-19), so God’s covenants are cumulative.
That does not follow.

One thing can only make another thing obsolete insofar as it has cumulative functionality. For example, a computer makes a typewriter obsolete, but doesn’t make a catapult obsolete. The Mosaic Covenant is eternal (Exodus 31:14-17, Leviticus 24:8), so the only way that the New Covenant can be make it obsolete is if it is cumulative with it. So the New Covenant still involves following the Mosaic Law (Hebrews 8:10)
Again, that does not follow. Here's what Hebrews 8:10 actually says:

This is the covenant I will establish with the people of Israel after that time, declares the Lord.
I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts.
I will be their God, and they will be my people.

It says nothing whatsoever about "following the Mosaic Law".

(The new covenant) is based on better promised and has a superior mediator. The problem that God found with the Mosaic Covenant was not with His law, but with the people for not continuing in their covenant (Hebrews 8:7-9)
God already told us what the problem was, in Romans 8:

1 Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, 2 because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering.

God never intended obedience to the Law to result in perfection; He gave it for two purposes: to preserve His people until they brought forth the Messiah, and to show them their need for a saviour. We and all people have that same need.

God did not establish the New Covenant so that we can be free to have the same disobedience to His law
For once we agree (in some small part), but you still miss the point: no mature Christian claims that we are free to sin. Every mature Christian may state confidently that we are not under the Sinai covenant.

Note what Romans 8:4 states: "And so he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

That should be the final word on the matter. Because of Christ's death, the requirements of the law HAVE BEEN MET. Past tense. Done. Jesus said it Himself: "It is finished!"
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
The only way to abolish God’s instructions for how to be in His likeness by being a doer of His character traits would be by first abolishing God.
Your reasoning here is wacky.

God doesn't intend that we become like Him by following the Law; that simply isn't going to happen, and God is not stupid. Instead, He gives His Spirit to those who believe in His Son. The Spirit works inside us to conform us to Christ.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,275
31,250
113

Galatians 4:9-10 ~ Now that you know God, or rather are known by God, how is it that you are turning back to those weak and worthless principles? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again? You are observing special days and months and seasons and years! I fear for you, that my efforts for you may have been in vain.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,857
13,980
113
That doesn’t interact with what I said and is a moot point because it is the same thing. The same God who gave His law to Moses also sent Jesus in fulfillment of the promise to turn us from our wickedness in disobedience to it (Acts 3:25-26), so there is no disagreement. In Matthew 4:15-23, Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, which was a light to the Gentiles, and the Mosaic Law was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel message. Jesus also set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way that he walked (1 John 2:6). So Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example and the Law of Christ is not other than or contrary to anything that Christ taught.
Okay, you've harped at length. How about you answer a few basic-Christianity questions:

For what reason did Jesus die on the cross?
What did Jesus' death on the cross accomplish?
What does it mean to put your faith in Jesus Christ?
What happens to the person who puts their faith in Jesus Christ?