Was it PThompson that elaborated on Hebrew 7:25 of a continual "coming" in the context of turning to Jesus' living forever established with a permanent priesthood? I'm not well versed in verb tenses to recognize any of them other than the basic of them, i.e. past present future, by sight, but I do notice that both "to save" and "intercede" are both present infinitive active, and "draw near" is present participle which can be used to indicate ongoing actions.
Therefore He is able to save completely those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to intercede for them.
I'm thinking of the Lord asking Peter, "why did you doubt?" after Peter cried out to Him, "Lord! Save me!" and so I wonder if I see it right that central argument in this the debate is not about whether the Lord would save those who cry out to Him but whether there is a possibility that Peter might come to a point of such discouragement that he fails to cry out anymore?
Therefore He is able to save completely those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to intercede for them.
I'm thinking of the Lord asking Peter, "why did you doubt?" after Peter cried out to Him, "Lord! Save me!" and so I wonder if I see it right that central argument in this the debate is not about whether the Lord would save those who cry out to Him but whether there is a possibility that Peter might come to a point of such discouragement that he fails to cry out anymore?
Or did Jesus restor him by asking him 3 times, do you love me