Jesus is the leader of a cult? Oh wait. I see you are banned. Sorry. I will let it goAnd Jesus is the leader
Want to join?
My KJV Debate with Jeffrey Dollar
- Thread starter Bible_Highlighter
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
He has been that way for awhile.
He somehow thinks God is the author of an imperfect english translation.
God breathed the origional text. penned by the autographers.
Not an english translation (which is outdated today) 1600 years later.
um is it?
We are born again of the true seed (christ) as promised to abraham, (in your seed shall all the nations of the world be blessed) through the seed of david. this seed which hung on a cross for our sins.
We KNOW of this seed through the word of God. but the word does not have to be the seed. who the word is about is the seed.
And I can learn the word of God and the gospel through any translation. I do not need an out of date 1600 english bible that most people can not even understand. .
Then you and all people who believe like you do believe Gods created an inperfect bible.
You screaming at people does not change this fact.
It does not exist. the english language on its own is a flawed language that can not 100% with perfect accuracy translate any greek bible.
lol. And your not a cult?
K
keepingthingsreal
Guest
Yes, it is, and James and Paul similarly wrote of the same.
Jas 1:18
Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.
1Co 4:15
For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel.
I think that I will stick with the interpretations of Jesus, Peter, James, and Paul. You would be wise to do the same.
The bold-faced part was Peter's point.
The KJV can easily be understood if one is humbly being led by the Holy Spirit and not their own proud human intellect.
perfect example of faulty reasoning.
I know people who profess KJV and teach false doctrines.
and point to that KJV as their proof.
I think that the problem arises, not with words that we don't use any more (we can easily look their meanings up), but in words that are still in use today, but with different meanings to what they had when the KJV was translated. An example is the word "prevent." Now, that word means to stop something happening. But it doesn't mean that in the KJV. For example:
Ps 88:13 But unto thee have I cried, O LORD; and in the morning shall my prayer prevent thee.
The Psalmist doesn't mean that his prayer will stop God doing something. "Prevent" used to mean "go before" or "come before."
I see this as a bigger problem than obsolete words, because as "prevent" is in everyday use still, a reader of the KJV won't know that it had a different meaning back then.
Bible_Highlighter said:
But I believe they can lose their salvation by believing false doctrines from those Modern Translations.
That is just absolute Nonsense ---your believing comes from the Enemy not God ====putting fear and sending confusion in people who may know better -----Fear and confusion comes from Satan not God --
You need to do some serious Praying that is------- IF YOU have the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit--- as what you are peddling here sounds to me like you don't ----your knowledge about Scripture seems very limited ---
Your more interested in being PUFFED UP by your Knowledge of what Greek is being used to translate God's word and your debates over the languages used ---- than you are spreading the gospel which is fine in all translations ------
But I believe they can lose their salvation by believing false doctrines from those Modern Translations.
That is just absolute Nonsense ---your believing comes from the Enemy not God ====putting fear and sending confusion in people who may know better -----Fear and confusion comes from Satan not God --
You need to do some serious Praying that is------- IF YOU have the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit--- as what you are peddling here sounds to me like you don't ----your knowledge about Scripture seems very limited ---
Your more interested in being PUFFED UP by your Knowledge of what Greek is being used to translate God's word and your debates over the languages used ---- than you are spreading the gospel which is fine in all translations ------
its ok,
I have looked at both sides for many years now.
So when I was reading what you said. I saw you had nothing new to add to the debate. just the same silly nonsense. so why would I bother to listen to what you said?
PS. I am MAGA. but thanks
many words like this
Baptize is not even an English word. so in no English bible is it even remotely interpreted correctly
Tongues. The word language did nto exist. yet when we upgraded. we kept the same word. which today is used to take it out of its context and meaning to support a cult
"Verily Verily" Has anyone hear some use this language anywhere (outside of the KJ Bible) in the last 100 years?
the amazing this is you did not need the KJV to tell you this spiritual truth
yes, they believe you first be made alive (in sin) so you can have the ability to believe otherwise. you have no ability to believe
I disagree about "baptize". It is an English word, though based on a Greek one. Many English words have their origin in another language (anorak, shampoo, brioche, to give just three examples), but they are still English words.
I agree that "tongue" was used for "language." And "verily" of course means "truly".
But those weren't the type of words I was thinking of in my previous post. I was thinking of words still in use in English, but with different meanings, words like "prevent," "suffer," (as in "Suffer the little children to come unto Me,") and "carriages" (as in: Ac 21:15 And after those days we took up our carriages, and went up to Jerusalem.).
It is. @Magenta has posted much that is true of the natural man and how he is opposed to God in both his heart and mind. A perusal of Romans 3:10 and following relates as much.
No they don't. They deny that sinful man has the ability in himself to exercise faith - they need God to work on their hearts. They look at verses such as Ephesians 2:4-5 as supporting this:
“But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved),” (Eph 2:4-5 NKJV)