A Christian seeks Holy Spirit guidance, who will guide in ALL truth. Reliance on "debates" between alleged believers is a very carnal suggestion.
I would be very happy to talk to him about his interpretation of Biblical prophecy. I don't think this needs to be public, but would not shy away from that as long as I knew going in what the key questions or interpretations we were discussing.
If He didn't want us to know the times, He would not have shown us what to watch for, and scripture clearly says we are to "watch therefore and wait"What is dangerous is reading the newspaper and looking for fulfillment of prophecy.
What is also dangerous is having God, post the crucifixion and resurrection in a constant state of agitation with humanity and lashing out through the use of lightening rods!
And then those who are believers sitting on their high perch of "saved" which is totally of God not by their works, condemning the world, when Jesus clearly stated He did not come to condemn the world.
"For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him."
best wishes
If He didn't want us to know the times, He would not have shown us what to watch for, and scripture clearly says we are to "watch therefore and wait"
To do what we are all required to do, proclaim His truth and seek first His kingdom, of course, why are you here?
You seem to be a labeler, assigning categories and labels to His created beings, He does not do this, He knows each of us individually and personally and seeks vital one on one relationship as Jesus modeled for us, He only did what He saw the Father do, He only said what He heard the Father say.
Do you wish to become a genuine Bible based believer or merely hold to an outward form of Godliness, denying the power?
I can't. I am not on Facebook and Youtube has cancelled my account. Without that access I cannot get his email. If you share his email by PM I will seek him out. You can get his email if you have not been blocked by Youtube.
I am listening to him and apparently he believes the language in the prophecies is metaphorical. I fully agree with that. However, he also says that they are not literal, I fully disagree with that. So if we were to debate / discuss we would come in with a lot of agreement. He bases his interpretation on the Bible, that is the only precondition I would have. I would concede that the prophecies are metaphorical, so the only issue would be are they also literal. I say yes, he says no.
I didn't write that title, I would have used the term "called home" rather than "struck dead". However, I thought it was very useful since he was able to point out five references to the Pope blaspheming the Lord.
Do you wish to become a genuine Bible based believer or merely hold to an outward form of Godliness, denying the power?
best wishes
If by "not literal" he means "not not metaphorical" then it is meaningless to add that as a qualification after already saying they are metaphorical.
