The Hypocrisy of Exegesis

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#41
John 14:6Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

KJV doesn't say LIGHT either hmm. I smell troll...

P.S. I am at home. :D
No it is I who smell troll

goodbye
 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#43
You mean like you just did here with this post.
I got big shoulders .............Doesn't matter man........... just trying to get a handle on things scripturally and some take offense to it.

I believe in something strongly but need vindication through proper understanding of scripture as I believe this to be vital to me making my point anyways and I can't believe in something unless I feel absolutely sure what I know is the bottom line or is authentic (guess I'm suspicious by nature)(very curious too)

I have often found that something you care about is much easier to defend than something you don't and this is something I care about..............Determining true doctrine and Learning it to memory...........I am finding if I immerse myself in it it becomes much more fluent sort of speak.

What I really need are a couple good theologians with A LOT OF PATIENCE and some time on their hands for starters.:D
 

pickles

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2009
14,479
182
63
#44
Yikes! I did not read all here as well most is out of my understanding. :)
But the basic arguement is about discussing the scriptures and sharing understanding.
What came to mind as I saw this, was when Jesus had stayed behind at the temple, Mary and Joseph came back to find Him discussing the scriptures with the learned.
They were amazed at His wisdom and understanding.
Anyway, not sure if this has any bearing on this "conversation" ?
Was just a thought.

God bless.
pickles
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#45
The post of the thread would have to go AOK for definitions, there I actually learned something lolz 

Cookies with cream and a lattee
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#46
I got big shoulders .............Doesn't matter man........... just trying to get a handle on things scripturally and some take offense to it.

I believe in something strongly but need vindication through proper understanding of scripture as I believe this to be vital to me making my point anyways and I can't believe in something unless I feel absolutely sure what I know is the bottom line or is authentic (guess I'm suspicious by nature)(very curious too)

I have often found that something you care about is much easier to defend than something you don't and this is something I care about..............Determining true doctrine and Learning it to memory...........I am finding if I immerse myself in it it becomes much more fluent sort of speak.

What I really need are a couple good theologians with A LOT OF PATIENCE and some time on their hands for starters.:D

Well dat woodnt be me:)
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#47
This whole thread is like someone saying, "Don't aim before you shoot the basketball in the hoop. Because if you look at the hoop, it means you're not looking at the ball. And the ball is what's in your hands. So just shoot with a firm grip on the ball. It's all about the ball!!"

I mean yeah, I guess this is all about the Bible. But like shooting a basketball there is technique and proper form.

Some people avoid exegesis so the rigors of sound interpretation won't invalidate the heresy, error and endless drivel they want to spew out of their puffed up spiritual pie hole.

I'm saying that about SOME in general. No one specifically.
yep gotta remember its all about the BALL!!!


 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#49
John 1:18, KJV

No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

declared (#1834 - Greek: exegeomai) to bring out, declare thoroughly and particularly. From this verb comes the English word exegesis - the unfolding through teaching.
Yes. The Logos was the Divine Expression to declare (exegeomai G1834) Him.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#50
Thank you Consumed. I appreciate being of service brother. :) God bless you this week.

P.S. Cookies with cream and a lattee sound delicious!

The post of the thread would have to go AOK for definitions, there I actually learned something lolz 

Cookies with cream and a lattee
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#52
If the EOC would consider you Anathema as you say then I guess it is evident of your origin then isn't it!
BTW... The EOC has already vehemently declared you anathema. Is that evidence of your origin, then? I'm not foolish enough to say so. You're wrong, but I do think you're diligently searching beyond the ridiculous boundaries that Orthodoxy has set.

It's the creation of Jesus that gives me an issue with your view. If it were an emergence or some other relevant terminology, it would be much different.

Genesis 1:3- "And God said, (the Divine Expression of the Logos) LET THERE BE (hayah H1961) light;..."

Without going into great detail of the Hebrew, the key to the meaning of Jehovah/Yahweh is in this verb.

If you didn't contend this was "creation" and that, instead, it was the "emergence" of Jesus from the eternal into the temporal... that would be quite a different thing.
 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#53
BTW... The EOC has already vehemently declared you anathema. Is that evidence of your origin, then? I'm not foolish enough to say so. You're wrong, but I do think you're diligently searching beyond the ridiculous boundaries that Orthodoxy has set.

It's the creation of Jesus that gives me an issue with your view. If it were an emergence or some other relevant terminology, it would be much different.

Genesis 1:3- "And God said, (the Divine Expression of the Logos) LET THERE BE (hayah H1961) light;..."

Without going into great detail of the Hebrew, the key to the meaning of Jehovah/Yahweh is in this verb.

If you didn't contend this was "creation" and that, instead, it was the "emergence" of Jesus from the eternal into the temporal... that would be quite a different thing.
On the surface it would seem very similar to me but I see your point if you subscribe to the 3 in 1 theory doesn't matter when I pull 40 lines of scripture to prove what I'm saying (all from the NT I noticed) you can see the development of the scriptures from OT to NT very clearly.
Now either the Apostles had it wrong (I doubt it but...) or the Jews are right (I doubt that as well but...)
Or someone screwed up big time in the descendancy of the scriptures (possible)but the words are very clear in their meaning and aptitude and as I said before I am using strictly scripture to prove my point and I feel I have done this very well. No amount of headbutting is going to change my beliefs. That will only be done by proof of scripture laid before me with an accurate exegesis of the scripture brought forth from the bible itself.
In recent days I have prayed many times for this to be shown to me and it has been such and from many different areas and schools of thought so please if you are going to interject please...please bring forth scripture as I feel this is the only way to settle my beliefs either founded or unfounded Thanks:D
 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#54
BTW... The EOC has already vehemently declared you anathema. Is that evidence of your origin, then? I'm not foolish enough to say so. You're wrong, but I do think you're diligently searching beyond the ridiculous boundaries that Orthodoxy has set.

It's the creation of Jesus that gives me an issue with your view. If it were an emergence or some other relevant terminology, it would be much different.

Genesis 1:3- "And God said, (the Divine Expression of the Logos) LET THERE BE (hayah H1961) light;..."

Without going into great detail of the Hebrew, the key to the meaning of Jehovah/Yahweh is in this verb.

If you didn't contend this was "creation" and that, instead, it was the "emergence" of Jesus from the eternal into the temporal... that would be quite a different thing.
P.S. I couldn't give a tinkers damn about what the EOC thought of me their an institution not the Lord himself Thanks
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#55
hey Musky you should read PPS other posts.

Ignore the juvenille attacks by others and you will get his exegesis.

i don't think you have that much difference just a few terms and miscommunication between the two of you.

by the way Musky, I don't think your beliefs are really Arian, but anyways....

Do you believe that Jesus was a created creature?

or an innate part of God that was spoken forth and made manifest when God's Soul/ Father spoke His Logos into the world? Of the same substance as God and existing within God until He spoke and manifested His Logos outwardly.

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/21795-who-god-really.html

metaphysics mmm...

please refrain from cussing, we have kids reading these thread. thanks...
 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#56
hey Musky you should read PPS other posts.

Ignore the juvenille attacks by others and you will get his exegesis.

i don't think you have that much difference just a few terms and miscommunication between the two of you.

by the way Musky, I don't think your beliefs are really Arian, but anyways....

Do you believe that Jesus was a created creature?

or an innate part of God that was spoken forth and made manifest when God's Soul/ Father spoke His Logos into the world? Of the same substance as God and existing within God until He spoke and manifested His Logos outwardly.

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/21795-who-god-really.html

metaphysics mmm...

please refrain from cussing, we have kids reading these thread. thanks...
My apologies if you thought I was cussing though from where I am from that would be considered polite

Personally Ananda my faith is an ever working piece of art of which I am only the canvas not the painter.

My definition of Jesus is similar to what you have just stated although I think he was created, spoken forth, what have you in the beginning when God said "Let there be light" This is when I think Jesus first came on the scene.
"For he is the light of the world" I believe is how it is penned.
I guess I am a bit of a perfectionist and need to be in the "proper know" (if you know what I mean)

I think I finally figured out when I was saved (not for certain)it happened about 7 months ago while musing over a website of Akianne Kramarik and saw her paintings of the Prince of Peace and had a total breakdown of flooding emotions running through me like never before.
If I ever get to meet her I am giving her a great big hug and whatever money is in my pockets at the time I meet her. It was this little girls testimony at the age of 8 on (The hour of power) with Robert Schuller that gave me such an inflection of faith that I had to believe NO CHOICE HAD TO right is right no matter how you slice it! So ever since I have been finding my faith and learning scripture like a ravenous wolf on a carcass. I just can't get enough



 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#57
First Begotten Son.... I always wondered what God meant when He said that....begotten not made, what is the difference?
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#59
First Begotten Son.... I always wondered what God meant when He said that....begotten not made, what is the difference?
Begotten (monogenes G3439) is a rich and lengthy study. It very specifically does NOT mean "create".