Is God's Word restricted by only what is originally written down?
- Thread starter Intersection
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I am referring to the original Bible. We will find out if Blain is also referring to the original Bible.
See? YOU'RE the one who thinks the original bible is Anton LaVay's satanic bible. @Blain was referring to God's Holy Bible.
I said I am referring to the original Bible. You are the one who just claimed the original Bible is the Satanic Bible.See? YOU'RE the one who thinks the original bible is Anton LaVay's satanic bible. @Blain was referring to God's Holy Bible.
Absolutely, God's Word is infallible. Several parts of the Word of God were not recorded such as what the Seven Thunders uttered, and also what Jesus wrote on the ground while a woman was about to be stoned. On day, this will be revealed. Also, the day and the hour of the return of Jesus is not mentioned. Jesus himself does not know the day and hour of his return, only the Father.
It must be a Good Book.According to @Intersection you @Blain could also be talking about one of my favorite cake cookbooks:
The Cake Bible
Because it has the word "Bible" in the title, LOL!!!
This Intersection's mental logic!
Oh please. You're not going to turn this around to me. Anyone can see you introduced the satanic bible into this thread.
I mentioned the same in a later post written before I read this post of yours.
Do you believe the original Bible is Satanic?Oh please. You're not going to turn this around to me. Anyone can see you introduced the satanic bible into this thread.
I believe the original Bible is infallible.
It's a classic! The one I posted is of the 35th Anniversary Edition. It's at Amazon if you ever want to take a look at it and read a sample.
Why should I answer? You'll just falsely accuse me of something. And it doesn't matter what you say you believe. You don't obey God.
Romans 1:16
For I am not ashamed of the gospel. For it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth, to the Jew first, and to the Greek.
For I am not ashamed of the gospel. For it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth, to the Jew first, and to the Greek.
1 John 3:4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he appeared so that he might take away our sins. And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has either seen him or known him.
7 Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. The one who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. 8 The one who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work. 9 No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in them; they cannot go on sinning, because they have been born of God. 10 This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not God’s child, nor is anyone who does not love their brother and sister.
You're the one going around falsely accusing @Blain and @HealthAndHappiness of evil things they haven't claimed. And you've done that to other real Christians on your other threads. I don't see you ever stopping that sin against my true brothers and sisters in Christ.
The Linguist in this interview only researched the history and wrote a book on the topics of the Bible origins, King James and Freemasonry. He's not nearly as knowledgeable as someone who copies and pastes results from a search engine.
Dear @2ndTimeIsTheCharm, @Blain , @shittim
About the 7:45 Mark /\ on in that previous video he speaks to the issue at hand. He dispels the myth that King James was a Freemason. There's a historical timeline chart if you want to pause and more on it at the channel for those interested.
That evolved later in the century to it's dark fraternal affiliation with the Jesuits.
King James also did not translate the Bible. He believed that there was a need for God's Word for the common man that both the pastors and people could embrace. He provided the funds and organization for that major project.
Daniels wrote his book on Freemasonry and it's association with the Jesuits. I was being a bit sarcastic about the comparison to the copy/ paste with an AI question earlier. I just don't have a lot of patience anymore for preachers who attempt to undermine the faith of others. I've had other friends who were students of the Bible, but trusted our pastor's scholarship with way too much gravity when he got proud of his personal scholarship of languages he could not hold a conversation in. This was a man who fell for the liberal German seminary teachers of the 1800s. They were the "higher critics" who attacked the Traditional Text for new discoveries. I have disagreements with the other English versions, but give grace to those who use them. Our pastor did not afford that same grace. Part of it was that he believed that the only accurate Scriptures were in the original autographs. He rejected the doctrine of God's preservation as did the teaching coming out of the critical seminaries .
I left that ministry after allowing my soul to be vexed for way too long. I did this after addressing the many attacks on our Bible with plenty of true evidence .
The King James Bible was and is the most attacked book in history, but stands to the devil's onslaught. The strange thing is that it's not coming from Satanists, but from professed ministers of God.
I forgive Intersection.
He has a right to believe as he wishes.
I hope he considers the free gift of everlasting life.
His many accusations are not worthy of much time however.
All of the evidence in the world will not convince all gainsayers, nor is it my time best spent in debates. Instead I spent the time winding down for the evening being blessed by a good history lesson about the preface of the Bible I'm about to read.
Perhaps you will find it interesting and enjoyable too.
I've already shared other videos today, so perhaps it will be something to look forward to later. You'll learn some interesting history about King James, his beliefs, hatred from witches who organized a coven against him and new things I learned about his personal life.
I hope you have a blessed week.
King James Bible / Edited By Freemason Sir Francis Bacon.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2UnmsoOIhLyn
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2UnmsoOIhLyn
I believe that this happens when we read the Bible , very regularly . For example , I've been reading it for over 30 years every day and I only just realised something .
Compare : Matthew Ch 19 v 16-22 to Mark Ch 10 v 17-22 . It was only quite recently that I realised something , in Mark , Jesus beholding him lived him , why I wondered . Also in Mark , Jesus tells the man : take up THE cross ( as opposed to your ) . Who did that ? Who , literally took up the , or Jesus's cross and followed him . Simon the Cyrenian . Jesus beholding him loved him because in that moment Jesus knew him , knew that he would carry Jesus's cross for him . To me , that was a revelation , that realisation didn't come from me , it came into me but not from me , so , where did it come from ? There really is only one explanation I think . How can someone read the Bible every day for decades , and all of a sudden realise something about what they have been reading ,over and over again previously , without realising anything ? I'm convinced totally that Jesus was talking to Simon the Cyrenian in this instance . But I didn't convince myself of this .
Which Bibles r those ? And why do u label them as such ? Can u b specific please do I can properly understand what u r saying / referring to ? Thank you
.