Where do you get your info from? Not the Bible. Angels cannot procreate.
John 1:12
(12) But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
Luke 3:38
(38) Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
If you read Genesis 4 & 5 you read 2 lines, the line of Cain, the line of Seth. the line of Cain were the daughters of men and Seth were the sons of God. Also man has decreased, look at the ages that they live before the flood they all lived over 900 years so they would have all been giants but, after the flood not only did the lifespan decrease but also the size of people as well. God created man perfect and able to eat from the tree of life before sin and since man was created a little lower then they would have been created a little lower in size as well to angels which means Adam and Eve would have been giants.
Before you criticize someone please be sure you know what you are saying. Fist of all you didn't really read carefully what I was saying, judging from your choice of scripture for rebuttal:
I said the term "sons of God" in the OT (Old Testament!) refers to angels or "heavenly beings" as some Bible translation, translate it - yes THE BIBLE!
Here are the other 3:
Job 1:6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
Job 2:1 Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.
Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
If you need more convincing read these in context...
Also where do you get the distinction from you make between sons of God being Seth's line and daughters of men being Cain's line? Where do you get the idea that all of these were giants? Even Adam and Eve? Just because they lived longer? Now where is that in the Bible please? It also talks about giants only after the specific mention of sons of God and daughters of men coming together, not before...
Actually we see later on long after the flood that not all were giants but there still were giants again in the land, prime example Goliath!
here is one in Numbers 13:33: (and this is the same word for giants in the original text)
And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
Peter tells us that these angels left their "Proper Domain" and sinned and were locked up for that.
In Genesis 6
- it says sons of God and women of men, it makes a distinction right there, when in the sentence and chapters before that it is already talking about the human race multiplying, so why using and highlighting this expression right there? Further right after the mentioning of these creatures procreating with women, it says that God limited their time on earth (well He must not have been pleased about it, if those were just normal humans what would be the point?) . Then it says that Noah found favor in God's eyes, first of all because he was PERFECT in his generations, meaning not polluted with procreation from these creatures in his family line...
But this is widely known already, I just summed it up to make a point to a prior post.
Since this is not really the point of this thread you should make one for it, if you want to discuss that further!