Not for nothing is it called a derangement syndrome. They blather on and on about Calvin and then
insist I believe what I do because of him when he has absolutely nothing to do with what I believe.
Your constant use of derogatory terms towards those who disagree with your presentation, determines a forgone conclusion of arguing in a personal matter.
It does not seem you can stick to the op, which is actually about Calvinism so no surprise people use the term, without your pictures adored with scripture that is taken out of context.
A person who disagrees with your beliefs, which sound just like Calvinism whether or not you care to identify with that monkier, is not deranged nor do they have a syndrome. No one is blathering or misidentifying what you believe since you have posted what you believe many times. You say you don't identify with Calvinsim, but don't you hold to the total inability to respnd to Christ that is one of the points of Calvinism? Total depravity? Feel free to say otherwise, but that point alone screams Calvinism and it is not reflected in biblical concepts.
No one is insisting on hanging a label on you, but the nasty comments that you sling at us sound very angry and are not helping you to 'explain' what it is you say you believe. But like I said, I seem to remember you do believe in total depravity, so that is a main point. I could be wrong and you can correct me, but no one has any kind of derangement syndrome and your words do not sound like you care to have any discussion but prefer to sling mud that is undeserved. You sound so prickly that I think some people prefer to not engage you at all and that would include me, but it's really over the top to say we have a syndrome or we are deranged.