Calvinism is Gospel !
- Thread starter brightfame52
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Seems like the two concepts are inseparable.
When we talk about salvation as the Spirit‑driven transformation of the inner person, we are immediately talking about the nature of God, because only a God with the right nature could accomplish such a work. If salvation requires the renewal of the heart, the awakening of the spirit, and the creation of a new inner life, then the Savior must possess both the willingness and the ability to transform human nature from the inside out. A God who is merely a judge could declare guilt or innocence, but He could not recreate the inner man. A God who is merely compassionate could desire our restoration but lack the power to accomplish it. The biblical God—holy, sovereign, life‑giving—is uniquely capable of performing the kind of salvation Paul describes in Romans 8 and Ephesians 2. In other words, our doctrine of salvation must match the nature of the God who saves, because only a God who can give life can make the dead live.
I hear what you are saying but Ephesians 2, doesn't read like total depravity. Paul’s emphasis is not on inability but on trajectory—a life shaped by the world, the flesh, and the devil. When he says his readers were “dead,” he immediately explains what that looked like: walking according to the course of this world, following the ruler of the power of the air, living in the passions of the flesh. These are active verbs. They describe people making real choices, pursuing real desires, and participating in a real pattern of life. Nothing in the passage suggests they were metaphysically unable to seek God; rather, they were morally and spiritually aligned with a corrupt system. Paul’s point is that their condition was hopeless without God’s intervention, not that they lacked the capacity to respond. In other words, Ephesians 2 portrays sinners as misaligned rather than incapable—people who needed rescue from a destructive path, not people who were prevented from choosing a different one.
In Ephesians 2, Paul’s phrase “prince of the power of the air” is not a throwaway metaphor—it carries a specific Greek nuance. The Greeks distinguished between the thick air (ἀήρ) near the earth and the thin air (αἰθήρ) above it. Paul uses the term for the *thick* air, the lower atmosphere—the realm of haze, fog, and obscurity. His point is not about altitude but about deception. This “prince” operates in the murky air where vision is clouded, where truth is obscured, where people cannot see clearly. And that fits Paul’s argument: sinners are not described as *unable* to see the truth but as unwilling, because the world system—under Satan’s influence—keeps them comfortable in a fog that hides the destructive nature of their path. They don’t see the danger because seeing it would disrupt their pleasures. In other words, Paul portrays humanity as misled rather than disabled—walking in a haze that suits their desires, not trapped in a darkness they cannot escape.
Saul,later aka Aposte Paul, held Stephens cloak while he was being stoned to death. Saul's encounter with Jesus on the Damascus road occurred because Saul and his companions were on their way to kill more Apostate Jews .
John Calvin is not on record as personally executing anyone when he was a prosecutor.
In fact in the case of Michael Servitus , Calvin insisted upon beheading, a more humane execution than burning at the stake. But he was overruled.
I've found chronic hatred of a person,idea,or thing,often precludes true facts amending such passion.
Chronic hatred of anything is a character flaw.
Sin is Rebellion against God, a violation of His commands. It is failure to do what is right according to God, acting apart from faith and trust in Him.
John Calvin never held political office, never worked as a state prosecutor, and never personally executed anyone. [1, 2, 3]
While critics frequently characterize him as the "tyrant of Geneva" who personally ordered executions, historical records demonstrate that Calvin lacked the legal authority to do so. He was a pastor and theologian, not a magistrate or a civic judge. [1, 2, 3, 4]
A precise breakdown of the historical realities exposes the inaccuracies within the common myths surrounding his authority.
1. Calvin Lacked Civil Power and Citizenship
- The Legal Fact: During the height of the most famous heresy trials in Geneva—including the execution of Michael Servetus in 1553—Calvin was not even a citizen of Geneva. He was a resident French refugee. [1, 2, 3, 5]
- He did not gain full citizenship status until 1559, six years after Servetus died. [1]
- Because he lacked citizenship, he could not vote, could not hold political office, could not sit on the ruling councils, and lacked any legal power to arrest, sentence, or execute anyone. [, 2, 3, 4]
2. His Real Role: Theological Expert and Accuser
When people claim Calvin acted as a "prosecutor," they confuse modern state prosecutors with 16th-century religious accusers. []
- Under Genevan civic law, if someone wanted to bring charges of heresy against an individual, they had to present the theological evidence to the Little Council of Twenty-Five (Geneva's actual civil court). [1, 2]
- In the Servetus trial, Calvin acted as the theological expert witness who drew up the specific list of heresies (such as Servetus's denial of the Trinity and infant baptism). [1, 2, 3]
- Calvin managed the theological debate in the courtroom, but the civil magistrates held the role of judge and jury. [, 2, 3, 4]
3. The Little Council Held Absolute Authority
The civil authorities in Geneva, not Calvin, made the final decision to execute Servetus. [1, 2]
- During this period, the Little Council was controlled by the Libertines—a political faction that actively opposed Calvin and sought to reduce his influence.
- The Council did not take orders from Calvin. In fact, they deliberately sought the outside consensus of neighboring Swiss Reformed cities (like Zurich, Bern, and Basel) to decide the verdict, entirely bypassing Calvin's personal authority.
- When the Council decreed that Servetus be burned alive at the stake, Calvin explicitly intervened and petitioned the court for a more humane execution (beheading). The civil council rejected Calvin's request to demonstrate their total political independence over him. [, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Summary for the Discussion
Calvin was never a secular prosecutor or a civic executioner. The civil government of Geneva handled all capital punishments. While Calvin agreed with the standard 16th-century European consensus that heresy was a punishable civil crime, attributing the actual legal condemnation or execution to his personal power is a complete historical error.
In the Bible, Sin is defined as any thought, word, action, or attitude that violates God's law and His perfect, holy character.
"For the law brings wrath, but where there is no law there is no transgression" Romans 4 and "sin is not imputed when there is no law" Romans 5
God is the author of Sin because God first is the author of His Holy Law.
Non-compliance, violation of His Holy Law is Sin.
Because God made it so.
Your bird analogy completely breaks with the actual text of Scripture and contradicts your own previous words.
First, using your example, a healthy bird that simply refuses to fly is not "dead." A bird that refuses to fly does so by choice. Paul did not use the Greek word for choice; he used the word nekros—a literal corpse. A dead bird does not have the option to fly because it has a 0% capacity to do so.
Second, your argument that the problem is merely "unwillingness" is completely at odds with your previous reply to me. You explicitly stated in it, that prior to rebirth, a person "simply could not perceive" spiritual reality and was in a state "where there is only spiritual deadness." You literally said, "where there is only spiritual deadness," with your use of the word "only" eliminating and emphasizing that no possibility exists for anything but deadness to exist within the spiritually dead - meaning they have no spiritual life nor true spiritual awareness within themselves whatsoever. If a person has only deadness, they therefore cannot even perceive the truth, they are spiritually unable to act on or respond to it. As spiritually dead, they are therefore oblivious to things spiritual unless and until they are first given spiritual life.
Third, you claim the issue is "hardness of heart" and a resistance that must be softened. But Ezekiel's "heart of stone" is not merely stubbornness or unwillingness to become a heart of flesh; instead, a heart of stone is dead and is completely incapable of transforming itself into a heart of flesh. A heart of stone is inanimate - the symbol of a heart lacking life - it possesses no ability to transform itself and requires a 100% unilateral miracle outside of itself for it to be changed. God said that He, and He alone, changes the heart, but only for those whom He places under the New Covenant and for no others. Man, of himself, is incapable of doing either.
By using images of corpses and rocks to argue for human ability, your logic defeats itself. The Greek lexicon defines being spiritual dead in part, as "destitute of power, inactive, and inoperative." In death, there is a zero percent possibility for anyone of their own power to save themselves. Through your own replies, you have made my point. Whether or not you realize it, you have linked total spiritual inability to spiritual death.
God the author of sin? what kind of warped mentality besets you? to me this is blasphemy. Man is the author of sin, the commandments were given to prevent sin so we know what not to do, so we know what sin is and NOT DO IT !
example:
New King James Version
but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat it, nor shall you touch it, lest you die.’ Gen 3:3
- Status