Why Are So Many Christians Still Single?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Hi Carrie! I'm not trying to be argumentative here, I'm just a little confused 😆.

You said when you've gotten in a relationship it has happened organically, yall met randomly, spent time together, and then realized yall wanted a relationship. My (very few) relationships started the same way. I would refer to that as "friends first".

However, you mentioned that you would never refer to a man you were interested in as being a friend. OK. That does make sense given the absolute disdain some men have for the term. Plus all the apparent hidden meanings the guys have decided on that I didn't know about. 😬

So...... what DO you call the time period of getting to know someone organically before deciding to date? If the person is in your life anyway through work or a Bible study then I guess you don't need a term for it, but what if they aren't and you both have to make a conscious effort to spend time getting to know each other? I would call that friendship but apparently that's a terrible idea lol 😆

No problem. I don't consider it argumentative. I mainly responded to the thread to give another woman's perspective. We all have different ways of feeling about things and going about things.

I don't know whether I just have a brain kinda like a man in this respect, but I also do not care for being referred to as a friend by a man unless that's strictly all we are. As soon as that word comes out of their mouth, I pull away. Mind you, I only pull away if I have feelings for them. If I don't have feelings for them, I don't have to pull away because there are no emotions there to detach.

If I don't have feelings for them, it's not a problem at all. I've noticed that men usually only say friend when they absolute only would ever think of you as a friend. I've actually very, very rarely heard a man refer to me as a friend. That's just my experience. So, if they say friend, then most likely they are indicating that they do not wish to be anything more ever. Of course, there will be exceptions, but that is usually how it is at least from my experience. I also operate this way and I didn't even think of it as just being how only men think.

It's not that I mind being friends with a man, but a guy friend never gets the time, attention, affection, etc. that is administered in a relationship - or to a man that has grabbed my interest.
In my experience, usually with relationships I've been in, we had a level of interest in each other during the time before the relationship started. It's like we knew that's what we wanted, but we were feeling things out, if that makes sense.

There's been times that for whatever reason neither of us revealed these feelings and we ended up going separate ways. For example, a long time ago there was a gentleman at work that I really liked. I never did tell him my feelings for him because he was older than me, and I worried that he'd think it was a bad idea. Our lives went separate ways. Neither of us ever said the word friend to each other. The last time I saw him, I gave him an embrace and he embraced me back warmly. It was like we knew, that life was sending us in different directions. I could tell that he had feelings for me. Often, you can tell. But, sometimes it just isn't meant to be. And that's okay. I didn't feel back then that my emotions were wasted. Sometimes, that's a part of the growth we experience in love and loss.

I've learned, and I'm still learning, how important it is to invest my emotions wisely. Sometimes, we have to take some risks though when it comes to someone we might be interested in. It can be tricky to put ourselves out there (if we desire to do so), but if we don't things might just end as an embrace and then a memory.

Well, this is all just my perspective and how I operate and view things!

So, I think I probably over-explained things lol. Sorry about that! In a nutshell, I guess I'd call that phase before the relationship the "getting to know each other" phase (for lack of a better way to put it). It never seems to need a name in my experience. Again, this is just my perspective based on my experiences! Things are rarely ever black and white, and perspectives and experiences vary. People should do things that fits them best, what fits their standards, boundaries, and convictions best. What looks fitting for me, won't be fitting for the next person and so on and so forth.
 
now that I'm thinking about it, I do have a few couples in my friends circle that started out that way, usually from meeting each other in group settings, like a young-adult Bible study.

Yeah quite a few of my friends have met their spouses as friends first in group Bible studies. One outlier is the guy who got a job at his future wife's workplace because he was hoping to date her. She completely friendzoned him. He still texted her every day with "Good morning, beautiful". I probly woulda blocked him for that lol but at some point something changed....they are expecting their third child now. 🤷‍♀️


it's not really all that complicated, is it? If one partner is a man, and the other partner is a woman...then, uh, yes, you're sexually compatible. :ROFL:

OH MY GOODNESS HES THINKING LIKE A MAN AGAIN MAKE HIM STOP PLEASE SOMEBODY MAKE HIM STOP 😩😜
 
Oh i get it now. You want it to be like the old days where the woman has no say. Its just your my wife now.
No, marriage should be arranged by a matchmaker or no marriage at all, that's how it worked as God designed. He created Eve out of Adam and joined them in marriage. This is like a transaction through a third party, they pay the seller first, when you receive and inspect their commodity, you pay the third party. Dealing directly with a seller you know nothing about is highly risky and foolish, and modern dating in the "new days" is exactly like that. It is not biblical at all.
 
OH MY GOODNESS HES THINKING LIKE A MAN AGAIN MAKE HIM STOP PLEASE SOMEBODY MAKE HIM STOP 😩😜
If you were able to think like a man, the first thing you should consider is why you'd share your property, your savings, your resources with a stranger you know nothing about, especially in this economy, that's what complicated. If the woman is poorer than you and lives on your income, she'd suck you dry; if she's richer than you and you live on her income, she won't tolerate you for long. Your feelings and emotions are nothing but a delusion if you can't figure the financial issues out.
 
There's only 2 real possibilities for that extreem line of thinking. One is a couple of traumatizing rejections or he thinks women need to sit down and shut up cause men run the world.

Id say more than likely reason two has led to lots of reason ones. And its oh so infuriating.
It's stated multiple times in the bible that wifes should 'submit" to the husband, isn't it. And nonetheless, "your desire shall be contrary to your husband's, and he shall rule over you," Gen. 3:16.
 
It's stated multiple times in the bible that wifes should 'submit" to the husband, isn't it. And nonetheless, "your desire shall be contrary to your husband's, and he shall rule over you," Gen. 3:16.
Which Bible version did you find that "contrary to" in? I just scanned many versions and didn't find it in any of them.
 
Which Bible version did you find that "contrary to" in? I just scanned many versions and didn't find it in any of them.
ESV. Any version that reads "for your husband" is mistranslation. See Gen. 4:7, "your desire shall be for you, but you should rule over it." It's the same formulation. It's a rebellious desire against the will.
 
ESV. Any version that reads "for your husband" is mistranslation. See Gen. 4:7, "your desire shall be for you, but you should rule over it." It's the same formulation. It's a rebellious desire against the will.
Nope. Just looked it up. ESV doesn't use "contrary to" either.

So which version are you really reading. The Lovette Abridged Version?
 
If you were able to think like a man, the first thing you should consider is why you'd share your property, your savings, your resources with a stranger you know nothing about, especially in this economy, that's what complicated. If the woman is poorer than you and lives on your income, she'd suck you dry; if she's richer than you and you live on her income, she won't tolerate you for long. Your feelings and emotions are nothing but a delusion if you can't figure the financial issues out.

Your use of the word "if" here is very interesting. I appreciate you including it. It's important.
 
Nope. Just looked it up. ESV doesn't use "contrary to" either.

So which version are you really reading. The Lovette Abridged Version?
You looked up wrong. Go check again, biblehub.com/genesis/3-16.htm.

English Standard Version
To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you.”



 
I agree that there was definitely something off-putting about her. Since you're new here then maybe you don't realize what a pastime it has become to post a clip of some random crazy woman doing random crazy stuff, and use it as an indictment against women in general. As if we were all thinking and acting as one common being.

I could find random clips of men behaving badly and post them here but that would be rude and unkind towards my brothers on this forum, mist of whom conduct themselves with class and respect.

Anyways... ya done set off JohndB. 🤦‍♀️ Now he's going to spend all his spare time finding clips of naughty women to post. And he's a boomer so no comprehension of rage-bait.... someone needs to give him a crash course in internets 101 I tell ya. 🤦‍♀️

I apologize it I was too rough. You're new here so I'll try to keep that in mind. But us gals are getting pretty tired of the endless parade of "look how terrible women are!". Most of the ladies here are quite classy and do not trash men in general but we would love to have the same courtesy 🙏
Why take it personally if you all are so classy? Sounds like JohnB is getting free rent in your head and what is your problem with boomers? Like it is some sort of indictment to be older? These cases are on the net and in the news, and people use them for discussion. I posted a thread on the Cornell 7 alleged rape case for discussion involving a college setting, booze and drugs, college fraternities, and a bunch of alleged white people behaving non-Christian and attempting to resolve it all under non-Christian models. Nobody here would suggest the female (Jane Doe) is a paradigm for most or all females, and i don't think that is the case with John.

The name of the thread is why are so many Christians single and the posts attempt to answer that question with the posted YouTube and X posts. It resonates with men (who probably do not have female contributors here in mind at all) and perhaps you do not want to hear what they are attempting to communicate because you seem to take it personally. Plenty of men are single because they find marriage too risky, with women too experienced, whereas chastity used to be a gold standard in the marriage market. It is rejected with scorn these days and that is also within the Christian community to a lesser extent. :rolleyes:
 
Young people don't have much saving, property, good to get married and build that together.

Older people can set wealth into trust fund, just enter into marriage with equal status if worries financial loss.

No matter the age, getting married is a step of faith. If no faith in other person, don't get married.
 
  • Pray
Reactions: seoulsearch
  • Like
Reactions: Lovette
You looked up wrong. Go check again, biblehub.com/genesis/3-16.htm.

English Standard Version
To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you.”



So according to that site, that will be the new version of the esv whenever they publish an update. But the whole blog is contesting that translation so maybe that's not the rendering you should use when no other translators have ever used that word and there is remarkable consistency between the translations saying your desire will be for you husband
 
So according to that site, that will be the new version of the esv whenever they publish an update. But the whole blog is contesting that translation so maybe that's not the rendering you should use when no other translators have ever used that word and there is remarkable consistency between the translations saying your desire will be for you husband
You can make your judgement based on Gen. 4:7. It's the same kind of desire and overrule.
 
You can make your judgement based on Gen. 4:7. It's the same kind of desire and overrule.
This is the magic of the internet. You can find one voice in 7 million that agrees with you, which makes it much easier to build your confirmation bias.

Fine. Justify your bad attitude anyway you want. You will anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cinder