H
I was one of those that was "born submerged in a religious, faith-promoting culture yet consider themselves to be scientifically, sceptically minded people that care about the truth." And I'm a stronger Christian when it comes to faith than I've ever been. And that's after I took a large number of science courses in a secular university. Those courses only served to strengthen my faith. My faith has been justified through reason, though even without reason, it would have been justified by my personal relationship with God. Science constantly changes, if you haven't noticed, or the theories do, because new evidence is always being found that alters former beliefs. I'm old enough to have seen that happen repeatedly just in the course of my lifetime. Should I believe what science has determined today to be true, or should I wait 20 years and believe what they say then? Or should I wait even longer? God; however, never changes, and I will always have my relationship with God, which ultimately justifies my faith. You assume people with faith never study, never question, never learn about modern science, history, etc. And you could not be more wrong. If this is your only argument, you definitely need a new one.
As if commit the very mistake you are accusing me of in that very sentence
I'm not hear to present arguments against God, I'm hear to try and find arguments for God. Hence why I have to regularly confront the issue of people telling me to just believe on faith, that's not something that's smart if you care about finding out the truth.