"So you're saying I'm not GOOD ENOUGH for you the way I am?"
"A woman marries a man hoping he will change. A man marries a woman hoping she will never change. Both are disappointed."
Where is the line between "My spouse wants me to clean up a few things I really should have taken care of long ago" and "My spouse is trying to change me into something I'm not, just to fit what I'm allegedly supposed to be"? Where does "I'm doing this because I want to make my partner happy" end and "I gotta be myself, not put on an act just to please somebody else" begin?
Let's take an extreme example. "She's trying to change me into something I'm not! What's wrong with chewing with my mouth open? Food tastes better with proper aeration. Why can't she just accept me the way I am? Why does she keep nagging me to change a fundamental part of what makes me me?"
Hmm... actually that's not so extreme. I've heard the same arguments used about other seemingly inconsequential things.
On the other side of the scale there's "Yeah I became a Catholic because that's how she was raised." Or "It hurt a lot, but my nose is healing up fine. She just likes guys with that kind of nose, so that's what I got."
What? I know people who have changed a lot more than that, just to keep somebody. There are guys who have changed to girls because the girls they loved preferred girls (and sometimes the girls choose other guys, and the guys who changed are left with no girls and missing parts...)
Now I know everybody draws the line at different places. I'm just curious where the line is for y'all. What is the minimum you would not be willing to change for a partner? Or what is the maximum you would be willing to change?
"A woman marries a man hoping he will change. A man marries a woman hoping she will never change. Both are disappointed."
Where is the line between "My spouse wants me to clean up a few things I really should have taken care of long ago" and "My spouse is trying to change me into something I'm not, just to fit what I'm allegedly supposed to be"? Where does "I'm doing this because I want to make my partner happy" end and "I gotta be myself, not put on an act just to please somebody else" begin?
Let's take an extreme example. "She's trying to change me into something I'm not! What's wrong with chewing with my mouth open? Food tastes better with proper aeration. Why can't she just accept me the way I am? Why does she keep nagging me to change a fundamental part of what makes me me?"
Hmm... actually that's not so extreme. I've heard the same arguments used about other seemingly inconsequential things.
On the other side of the scale there's "Yeah I became a Catholic because that's how she was raised." Or "It hurt a lot, but my nose is healing up fine. She just likes guys with that kind of nose, so that's what I got."
What? I know people who have changed a lot more than that, just to keep somebody. There are guys who have changed to girls because the girls they loved preferred girls (and sometimes the girls choose other guys, and the guys who changed are left with no girls and missing parts...)
Now I know everybody draws the line at different places. I'm just curious where the line is for y'all. What is the minimum you would not be willing to change for a partner? Or what is the maximum you would be willing to change?
- 1
- Show all