Has the second coming occurred already?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
Jesus placed removal BEFORE judgeman
Jesus placed removal BEFORE judgemant.

You need example of removal AFTER judgement.
No rapture after gt.
No verses even pointing to it.
Judgement and tribulation are 2 different word that has 2 different meaning.

Stephen was stoned to death. This is not judgement, this is persecution or tribulation for christian

A man of sin or antichrist Will persecute Christian severly for 7 years before rapture

2 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,977
972
113
44
Before I tell why I believe, what I believe I make sure what you believe

Please answere my question
Okay.... not sure why you'd reply to my challenge for you to explain my problem with what YOU assert, yet here I am still defending my beliefs first because NOBODY can answer my question, and EVERYBODY, including you right now, just deflects and goes back to trying to question what I believe. Stop, defend YOUR belief, ALL OF YOU. I come here alone knowing I have the MUCH less popular view, but I believe it to be truth,so I try to share, but you guys WILL NOT defend your beliefs and you have everyone on your side to back you up. How do my beliefs have any bearing on you defending what you believe? This is another tactic for avoiding the main subject here and I will not play into it. No you can't answer my problem with your view. I have no problem with my view, that's why I believe it. I believe it fits His word the best. You and by "you" I mean every single person in this thread that believes these things are "to come", not one of you will touch this question, it makes you all deflect and avoid, accuse and name call. My mind is truly blown.You know what? It's Titus I believe fits the "man of sin" title the best in my opinion, having destroyed Gods temple, sacrificed goats and pigs on the alter, then declaring himself god, but that said there are admittedly ways he doesn't fit as well. I'm not 100% on that honestly, if you even can be, but how on earth does that have anything at all to do with you answering the "3rd temple dilemma"? Without figuring this out, it's YOUR beliefs are impossible, period. How about we forget about ridiculing my beliefs for a sec and focus in (and this goes for every pre tribber out there, not just you) and stand on your foundation for a minute to tell me how this 3rd temple is even possible, because it's not adding up in my opinion, and NO ONE will touch it.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Your insistence upon treating all Scripture as figurative leads to some very strange interpretations.


It's not a parable. It's typological, not parabolic.
Some of the mysteries of God seem strange but true.Its how he hid truth from those who literalize the signified understanding.

Typological is the signified language used in parables. Without them Christ spoke not.

His outward temporal life was a parable revealing the unseen things of the father. Called faith.

Revelation 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,584
9,104
113
So answer me this, what "temple" of these two is being referenced concerning the Abomination of Desolation? Because it's very clear to me this is Gods temple, the temple He commanded built and that was used in the Jewish sacrifices. You said "I believe there will be a literal Temple". How? Did God command another one built?
First off, we don't have to guess what the abomination that causes desolation is. We know it happened in history already, when Antiochus Epiphanes sacrificed a pig on the altar, and erected a statue of Zeus. Jesus points to this event in the Olivet discourse. This HAS NOT happened since Antiochus Epiphanes. It ALMOST happened in A.D. 68 I think it was, but it didn't.

And. Who says this temple is going to be God ordained? Israel has been planning for a long time to rebuild the temple.
Of course, for almost 2000 yrs preterists of every stripe said "See! Told you this temple, and Israel, and antichrist, 1000 yr reign stuff was bunk! The nation doesn't exist, and the Jews aren't in the land"..

You would of thought all preterists would have evaporated and admitted they were wrong after May 14th 1948, when David ben Gurion, cited Ezekiel, in declaring the Nation of Israel! But nope. There are just as many now, if not more, than there were then.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Some of the mysteries of God seem strange but true.Its how he hid truth from those who literalize the signified understanding.

Typological is the signified language used in parables. Without them Christ spoke not.

His outward temporal life was a parable revealing the unseen things of the father. Called faith.

Revelation 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
And that language is called "unknown tongues" in other parts of the bible.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
First off, we don't have to guess what the abomination that causes desolation is. We know it happened in history already, when Antiochus Epiphanes sacrificed a pig on the altar, and erected a statue of Zeus. Jesus points to this event in the Olivet discourse. This HAS NOT happened since Antiochus Epiphanes. It ALMOST happened in A.D. 68 I think it was, but it didn't.

And. Who says this temple is going to be God ordained? Israel has been planning for a long time to rebuild the temple.
Of course, for almost 2000 yrs preterists of every stripe said "See! Told you this temple, and Israel, and antichrist, 1000 yr reign stuff was bunk! The nation doesn't exist, and the Jews aren't in the land"..

You would of thought all preterists would have evaporated and admitted they were wrong after May 14th 1948, when David ben Gurion, cited Ezekiel, in declaring the Nation of Israel! But nope. There are just as many now, if not more, than there were then.
I'm sorry but some one sacrificing a pig on a Christ hating Jewish alter IS NOT an abomination to God.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Has it ever ocurred to anyone that the Jews killing Christ WAS The Abomination that left the Jews completely Desolate even to this day.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
Okay.... not sure why you'd reply to my challenge for you to explain my problem with what YOU assert, yet here I am still defending my beliefs first because NOBODY can answer my question, and EVERYBODY, including you right now, just deflects and goes back to trying to question what I believe. Stop, defend YOUR belief, ALL OF YOU. I come here alone knowing I have the MUCH less popular view, but I believe it to be truth,so I try to share, but you guys WILL NOT defend your beliefs and you have everyone on your side to back you up. How do my beliefs have any bearing on you defending what you believe? This is another tactic for avoiding the main subject here and I will not play into it. No you can't answer my problem with your view. I have no problem with my view, that's why I believe it. I believe it fits His word the best. You and by "you" I mean every single person in this thread that believes these things are "to come", not one of you will touch this question, it makes you all deflect and avoid, accuse and name call. My mind is truly blown.You know what? It's Titus I believe fits the "man of sin" title the best in my opinion, having destroyed Gods temple, sacrificed goats and pigs on the alter, then declaring himself god, but that said there are admittedly ways he doesn't fit as well. I'm not 100% on that honestly, if you even can be, but how on earth does that have anything at all to do with you answering the "3rd temple dilemma"? Without figuring this out, it's YOUR beliefs are impossible, period. How about we forget about ridiculing my beliefs for a sec and focus in (and this goes for every pre tribber out there, not just you) and stand on your foundation for a minute to tell me how this 3rd temple is even possible, because it's not adding up in my opinion, and NO ONE will touch it.
So you believe Titus is a man of sin or the second beast or first beast in rev 13.

I don't share this believe.

1. After antichrist Will follow Jesus appear in the sky and every one see

2. Than Jesus reign for 1000 years from mount Olive and after Titus this is Bot happen

So your dilema about temple must be build for God, not for antichrist.

Did you believe that temple that destroy by Titus build for Titus? Or for God?
 
S

SpoonJuly

Guest
Has it ever ocurred to anyone that the Jews killing Christ WAS The Abomination that left the Jews completely Desolate even to this day.
It was not their "killing" Christ, but their rejection that was an abomination that lead to the destruction of the temple, Jerusalem, the nation of Israel, and the scattering of the Jews in 70AD.
 
Apr 3, 2019
1,495
768
113
Of course the "abomination of desolation" occurred in the 1st century. Jesus stated it would.

The "flee to the mountains" motif is used in all three gospels and are related to "this generation will not pass" as in the generation that heard Jesus speak.

(Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.)

(Luke 21:21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.)

The Greek word erhmwsiv - desolation occurs in each of the the three gospel narratives and only three times in the NT. Therefore they are speaking of the same events whether it is spoken of " the abomination of desolation" or "the desolation thereof is nigh."

(Mat 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand)

(Mat 24:16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains)

Luke and Matthew are describing the same desolation which occurred when the Romans wrecked the temple and Jerusalem in the 66-70 AD war against the Jews.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,584
9,104
113
Has it ever ocurred to anyone that the Jews killing Christ WAS The Abomination that left the Jews completely Desolate even to this day.
Yeah..... No.

Utter and complete imagination, without a shred of Biblical evidence. The Abomination stands in the holy place. Not in some imaginative private interpretation.

Oh, and BTW, did you know that the nation of Israel is there TODAY, right where it was 2000 yrs ago?
 
Apr 3, 2019
1,495
768
113
Has it ever ocurred to anyone that the Jews killing Christ WAS The Abomination that left the Jews completely Desolate even to this day.
I dunno about that K16, we need to be careful how we understand the "desolation" and or the "abomination of desolation" - Jesus did declare while he was alive that the Jews' house was left to them desolate:

(Mat 23:38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate)
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
Yeah..... No.

Utter and complete imagination, without a shred of Biblical evidence. The Abomination stands in the holy place. Not in some imaginative private interpretation.

Oh, and BTW, did you know that the nation of Israel is there TODAY, right where it was 2000 yrs ago?
The only holy place that I can think of is where the blood of the Lamb was shed. What do you think all of those Old Testament shadows of the blood of the Lamb were pointing to? What was the fulfillment of the alter in the most holy place? Or maybe you think that is not yet fulfilled.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I'm sorry but some one sacrificing a pig on a Christ hating Jewish alter IS NOT an abomination to God.
No one said it was an abomination to God

it says it is an abomination which makes desolate the wing of the temple.

whihc is exactly what Jesus said it would do.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
I dunno about that K16, we need to be careful how we understand the "desolation" and or the "abomination of desolation" - Jesus did declare while he was alive that the Jews' house was left to them desolate:

(Mat 23:38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate)
I know we disagree on this. :)
There was no abomination done in AD 70 that I'm aware of. Especially one as bad as killing your own God.