Thought policing and "trigger words" in Christian community

Personally I try to see if there is error in ones understanding. But if they try to express a false doctine then it's war. I do try to look out for babes in this forum. Or true seekers who do not have a grasp on some of the theologies, or foundational truths. I think I've expressed this in another thread.
It's simply not ok to entertain some of the idealisms that some seem to adhere to.

It's super discouraging to see what we believe to be the church fleecing the congregation; robing people who believe of God, of what he gave us, our communion with him.
We have made it about singing songs which is to say singing spiritual songs is important, but not as important his sacraments. We preach sermons which contain very little scripture, I don't understand why.

The bible decides what is true, not any person and certainly not me.

Which is why I am here. To have a catalyst that causes me to study, and to share what I have learned. Also yes to refute bad doctrine, which sadly this form is full of.
Sacramentarianism is bloody rampant, and when you refute it be prepared for the attack. It's a whole western evangelical theology issue.
Then the whole works based salvation, and the idea that one could lose salvation, and that salvation is some kind of decision. I still can't figure out how believing something is a decision. To believe something is to be compelled by evidence.

Homosexuality is a trigger word for many, will you now police my thought and speech?

The emoji of sticking the tongue out is fitting of you, pictures speak a thousand words.

Christian community has its own political correctness Manifesto. Just try saying:

- "science states"
- "microevolution" (speciation, or adaptation of a Noah's ark "kinds" into diverse species. I used this term before on CC and brothers and sisters came insisting that I should absolutely not use the term and that it's wrong to use it. I was genuinely surprised, even after I explained my views the term was still opposed, it was like I used "the wrong pronoun")
- "evolution" - brothers and sisters who interpret the Bible different than the majority are vehemently renounced
- "amillennialism" - they are not "true" believers, they are "not saved"
- "the church is Israel" (comprised of both Jews and non Jews) - people immediately come screaming "replacement theology"
- "saved by grace alone" - there will always be people quick to accuse you of "preaching license". So you can't attribute all the glory to God without getting opposed or being forced to put up a politically correct disclaimer of obedience, which should be a no brainer.
Sometimes, it's enough to say "science"...

This is tiresome.
For a lot of people, the more something is banned and suppressed, the more they are considering it. That's certainly something to think about. You're actually pushing fellow Christians to consider whatever view you're so emphatically against, the more you do this, the more people will consider it.

What‘s your obsession with homosexuality, my man?
So focused on one sin?

You know...there is a belief that,...nevermind. You’ll just turn this back into a homosexual related debate.


BTW, I noticed you like to debate the gentile souls around here?
...yet you ignore my questions?

Nice. 👍🏽

I have not read past the OP.

I don't see what is wrong with using the words "science states" - the word 'science' refers to the collective whole of modern science 'thought' and the word 'states' (in this context) refers to something "issued" or "put forth" from 'science'.

Perhaps there is a misunderstanding of what 'microevolution' actually means?

Do people not understand that: 'microevolution' occurs; 'macroevolution' does not.

Of course, the term 'evolution' itself is such a wide-open problem-of-a-word for the Christian realm. However, if we understand the accepted definitions of words, we can at least have constructive conversations about the subject matter. We just need to keep in mind - what God has defined and what man has defined - and keep them separate where "accepted truth" is concerned.

Every time you say 'science', refer to 1 Timothy 6:20 also.

(HAHAHA - just kidding around)

Some 'science' is perfectly good. Some 'science' is not.

Christians should be the most 'mature' people on earth - when it comes to "being able to talk about anything"...

Christians should have the most complete and thorough understanding of the true nature of the reality we live in.

Christians should be able to 'handle' discussions about anything-under-the-sun with discernment and self-discipline.

???

Always when a thread that calls for a deeper conversation is started, someone negative comes to derail it like that.

Has anyone ever seen such a thread stay on topic past the end of the first page?

I have not read past the OP.

I don't see what is wrong with using the words "science states" - the word 'science' refers to the collective whole of modern science 'thought' and the word 'states' (in this context) refers to something "issued" or "put forth" from 'science'.

Perhaps there is a misunderstanding of what 'microevolution' actually means?

Do people not understand that: 'microevolution' occurs; 'macroevolution' does not.

Of course, the term 'evolution' itself is such a wide-open problem-of-a-word for the Christian realm. However, if we understand the accepted definitions of words, we can at least have constructive conversations about the subject matter. We just need to keep in mind - what God has defined and what man has defined - and keep them separate where "accepted truth" is concerned.

Every time you say 'science', refer to 1 Timothy 6:20 also.

(HAHAHA - just kidding around)

Some 'science' is perfectly good. Some 'science' is not.

Christians should be the most 'mature' people on earth - when it comes to "being able to talk about anything"...

Christians should have the most complete and thorough understanding of the true nature of the reality we live in.

Christians should be able to 'handle' discussions about anything-under-the-sun with discernment and self-discipline.

???

Gary as a christian in the 21st century, when the words (Science States) do you believe the (Scientist) mentioned are unbiased, in support of Gods words relating to the origins of man, his creation of the earth with its life, and the universe?

The secular world is trying to change words used, away from the historical biblical perspective, Christian's need to be aware of this?

Jesus Christ Is Lord!

Homosexuality is a trigger word, it has captured your attention for response.

No scientist is 100% unbiased - because - all are taught according to a system that teaches a mixture of methods that are part good and part faulty.