Christian tithing was started by the Roman Catholic Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L

Live4Him2

Guest
#21
#21
Dino246 said:
Which has nothing to do with "tithing".
Click to expand...
Sigh...

I Corinthians chapter 9

[13] Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the alter are partakers with the alter?
[14] Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.

Those who ministered about holy things while living of the things of the temple, and those who waited at the altar while being partakers of the altar WERE THE LEVITICAL PRIESTS WHO WERE BEING SUSTAINED BY THE TITHES OF THE PEOPLE.

EVEN SO hath THE LORD ORDAINED that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.
 
A

arthurfleminger

Well-known member
#25
Aug 18, 2021
1,405
771
113
#25
Personall, I believe that an individual should give what they can afford, from the heart. Like the widow who gave her mite. I absolutely don't believe in tthe 10% tithe.

And surprisingly, the Catholic Church does not tithe, it is only some of our brother Protestant denominations that do advocate tithing today.

Many of our Protestant sects, especially Evangelicals, interpret tithing as giving 10% of their income to their home church. Contributions to other charities must be above and beyond what they give their church.

Tithing remains an important doctrine in many Christian denominations, such as the Congregationalist Churches, Methodist Churches and Seventh-day Adventist Church.

What religions pay tithing? - Protestant community (raymundtamayo.com)
 
ResidentAlien

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
#26
Apr 21, 2021
7,585
3,167
113
#26
arthurfleminger said:
Tithing remains an important doctrine in many Christian denominations, such as the Congregationalist Churches, Methodist Churches and Seventh-day Adventist Church.
Click to expand...
I mostly agree. I would only add: "Tithing remains an important [false] doctrine in many Christian denominations, such as the Congregationalist Churches, Methodist Churches and Seventh-day Adventist Church."
 
A

arthurfleminger

Well-known member
#27
Aug 18, 2021
1,405
771
113
#27
arthurfleminger said:
Personall, I believe that an individual should give what they can afford, from the heart. Like the widow who gave her mite. I absolutely don't believe in tthe 10% tithe.

And surprisingly, the Catholic Church does not tithe, it is only some of our brother Protestant denominations that do advocate tithing today.

Many of our Protestant sects, especially Evangelicals, interpret tithing as giving 10% of their income to their home church. Contributions to other charities must be above and beyond what they give their church.

Tithing remains an important doctrine in many Christian denominations, such as the Congregationalist Churches, Methodist Churches and Seventh-day Adventist Church.

What religions pay tithing? - Protestant community (raymundtamayo.com)
Click to expand...

In fact, it is only some of our Protestant denominations who continue to teach the doctrine of the 10% tithe.
 
JohnDB

JohnDB

Well-known member
#28
Jan 16, 2021
5,621
2,208
113
#28
ResidentAlien said:
Whether tithing was practiced before Judaism or Christianity is irrelevant. The best place to find what early Christians believed and practiced is the New Testament. There's no record at all there that tithing was practiced. It first shows up in the records of the RCC in the 6th century.
Click to expand...
Annanias and Sapphira...
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#29
Jun 30, 2015
24,703
13,384
113
#29
Live4Him2 said:
And there's no record that he didn't. The inference is that he did.
Click to expand...
The text contains no such "inference"; that's called eisegesis.

Live4Him2 said:
Abram/Abraham, Melchizedek, Levi, and Jesus Christ are all inter-related in relation to tithing.
Click to expand...
Wrong. The priesthood of Melchizedek is compared (and elevated above) the priesthood of Levi. Christ is of the priesthood of Melchizedek. That's it, that's all. The text simply does not support--at all--the idea that Christians are to pay tithes.

Live4Him2 said:
Scripture (not something that I allegedly "made up") declares that Levi paid tithes to Melchizedek as well in that he was yet in Abram's/Abraham's loins at that time.
Click to expand...
Wrong again. Scripture says, "One might even say that Levi ... paid tithes". It's a rhetorical device employed to demonstrate the superiority of Melchizedek's priesthood over that of Levi.

Live4Him2 said:
The Levitical priesthood was ultimately replaced by Christ's priesthood, and Christ is a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.
Click to expand...
No disagreement there.

Live4Him2 said:
Are you seriously suggesting that Jesus isn't the high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek about whom God swore?
Click to expand...
Your reading comprehension is in question here.

Live4Him2 said:
(you're in a bunch of error already either way).
Click to expand...
Yawn.

Live4Him2 said:
For someone who is repeatedly wrong himself, you sure do (mis-) use the word "wrong" a lot.
Click to expand...
More yawn. You haven't demonstrated that I am wrong on anything. You have just disagreed.

Discussing this topic (or any, for that matter) will be a lot more productive if you leave out the demeaning comments and personal attacks. Of course, if you can't manage that, then I am happy to treat you as your attitude warrants.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#31
Jun 30, 2015
24,703
13,384
113
#31
Inquisitor said:
Will you muzzle the ox while it is threshing?
Click to expand...
Will you erroneously conflate tithing and giving?

Do you see any opponent of tithing oppose financial support of Christian ministers? Not likely.
 
O

Oblio

Guest
#33
#33
I believe that giving is laid out in 2 Corinthians 8 & 9.
I once heard a young guy, he was 18 or 19, who had been seriously injured and partially crippled in a car accident, explain to a ministry leader, "I can barely pay my bills and eat!" The response was, "It doesn't matter, you must tithe!" The ministry leader was well-off! SMH!
 
JohnDB

JohnDB

Well-known member
#34
Jan 16, 2021
5,621
2,208
113
#34
ResidentAlien said:
I don't know what you're trying to say but the account of Ananias and Sapphira has nothing whatsoever to do with tithing.
Click to expand...
Since the Old Covenant Law has been replaced with the New Covenant...it's all "giving" now.

And since that is what Annanias and Sapphira were doing...I think that it's highly relevant to the situation that we as Christians face. I mean vows of giving must be honored or face horrible consequnces.
 
ResidentAlien

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
#35
Apr 21, 2021
7,585
3,167
113
#35
JohnDB said:
Since the Old Covenant Law has been replaced with the New Covenant...it's all "giving" now.

And since that is what Annanias and Sapphira were doing...I think that it's highly relevant to the situation that we as Christians face. I mean vows of giving must be honored or face horrible consequnces.
Click to expand...
Ananias and Sapphira weren't struck down because they failed to follow through on a vow; they were struck down for lying to God.
 
JeffA

JeffA

Minstrel
#36
Mar 31, 2022
360
72
28
#36
Live4Him2 said:
“And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: and blessed be the most high God, which has delivered your enemies into your hand. AND HE GAVE HIM TITHES OF ALL.” (Gen. 14:18-20)

“And Jacob vowed a vow, saying, If God will be with me, and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat, and raiment to put on, so that I come again to my father's house in peace; then shall the LORD be my God: and this stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be God's house: AND OF ALL THAT YOU SHALL GIVE ME I WILL SURELY GIVE THE TENTH UNTO YOU.” (Gen. 28:20-22)

Both Abram/Abraham and Jacob paid tithes BEFORE there was ever a Levite, a Jew, or an Israelite upon the face of this earth and LONG BEFORE the Mosaic law was ever given at Mt. Sinai.

Jacob vowed to “give the tenth” (Gen. 28:22) or to give the tithe BEFORE Levi was born (Gen. 29:34), and the Levitical priesthood sprang forth from the tribe of Levi HUNDREDS OF YEARS LATER.

Furthermore, Jacob vowed to “give the tenth” (Gen. 28:22) or to give the tithe BEFORE Judah was born (Gen. 29:35), and it is from the name Judah that we derive the word “Jew":

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=Jew

Further still, Jacob vowed to “give the tenth” (Gen. 28:22) or to give the tithe BEFORE God changed his name to Israel (Gen. 32:28) and BEFORE his twelve sons became known as “the twelve tribes of Israel” (Gen. 49:28), so there was no such thing as an Israelite in existence at that time.

Additionally, a simple reading of scripture will clearly show that Abram/Abraham (Gen. 25:7) and Jacob (Gen. 49:33) both died HUNDREDS OF YEARS BEFORE the Mosaic law was ever given (Exod. chapter 19 and beyond), so the tithe PRECEDED the Mosaic law as well.

This is reality, friends, and we’d be wise to embrace the same because the only other embraceable option is DELUSION.

2. Although the Levitical priesthood truly has been replaced by the priesthood of Jesus Christ, the Bible teaches that Christ still receives tithes as our high priest.

We’ve already seen that Abram/Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek who was “the priest of the most high God” (Genesis 14:18) LONG BEFORE there was ever a Levite, a Jew, an Israelite, or the Mosaic law upon the face of this earth. Now, we need to consider that the Melchizedekian priesthood not only PRECEDED the Levitical priesthood, but that God also swore that he would raise up another priest forever after the order of Melchizedek AFTER the Levitical priesthood had come into effect.



(Continued in my next post)
Click to expand...
Hallelujah and Amen
All praise be to Melchizedek, King of Salem Peace!
 
JeffA

JeffA

Minstrel
#37
Mar 31, 2022
360
72
28
#37
JohnDB said:
Since the Old Covenant Law has been replaced with the New Covenant...it's all "giving" now.

And since that is what Annanias and Sapphira were doing...I think that it's highly relevant to the situation that we as Christians face. I mean vows of giving must be honored or face horrible consequnces.
Click to expand...
It seems that story is more about lying than anything else.
 
JeffA

JeffA

Minstrel
#38
Mar 31, 2022
360
72
28
#38
I give what I can. Sometimes directly to my Pastor.
It only blesses me when I do it from my heart.
As a man, I'm sovereign. I have a problem with those who think they have authority over me.
 
JeffA

JeffA

Minstrel
#39
Mar 31, 2022
360
72
28
#39
Don't we all get that warm, fuzzy feeling from God when we do something generous?
Not just for the Church.
I don't get that feeling when I am compelled under duress.
 
L

Live4Him2

Guest
#40
#40
Sigh (again)...

Here is what you initially said:

Dino246 said:
If you actually take the time to read your Bible, you will see that there is no record in Scripture that Jacob ever fulfilled his vow in even the smallest thing.
Click to expand...
Initially, you mentioned "the Bible" (not a singular "text", which you've since conveniently changed your initial comment to) and "no record in scripture" (not no record in that singular "text", which you've since conveniently changed your initial comment to).

To which I replied:
Live4Him2 said:
And there's no record that he didn't. The inference is that he did.
Click to expand...
My "there's no record that he didn't" was in direct respond to what you said in relation to "the Bible" (not a singular "text", which you've since conveniently changed your initial comment to) and "no record in scripture" (not a singular "text", which is what you've since conveniently changed your initial comment to).

With this reality before us, when I said "the inference is that he did", I was talking about "the inference" in relation to the whole of "the Bible" (not a singular "text", which you've since conveniently changed your initial comment to) and/or "the inference" in relation to the whole of "scripture" (not a singular "text", which is what you've since conveniently changed your initial comment to).

Got it?

Again, this is what you've now conveniently changed your initial comment in relation to "the Bible" and "in scripture" to:
Dino246 said:
The text contains no such "inference"; that's called eisegesis.
Click to expand...
So, in relation to what I actually said IN CONTEXT in relation to "the Bible" and "in scripture", is there truly an "inference" that Jacob fulfilled his vow?

Well, if you knew what an "inference" actually is, then you wouldn't have wrongly suggested that I was guilty of "eisegesis".

Here's what "infer" means:

https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/infer

infer

TRANSITIVE VERB

Deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.

My deduction from evidence and reasoning RATHER THAN FROM EXPLICIT STATEMENTS is based upon such passages in "the Bible" or "in scripture" as this:

"If a man vow a vow unto the LORD, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth." (Numbers 30:2)

"When thou shalt vow a vow unto the LORD thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for the LORD thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee." (Deuteronomy 23:21)

Etc., etc., etc.

Seeing how there's no record in "the Bible" or "in scripture" that Jacob sinned against God by not performing that which he had vowed to do, "the inference" (not "eisegesis") is that he did indeed fulfil that which he had vowed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.