Why do so many Churches teach a salvation doctrine opposed the the one Jesus taught?

Have you ever heard of a group called the Hebrew Israelites?They love the old testament and deny CLEAR scripture spoken of In the New Testament scriptures and cling to the Old Testament which they Don't and Can't keep.

The Roman Catholic Church holds the erroneous and heretical position that their tradition and dictates of the pope are equal with the authority of Scripture. A blasphemous position.

"82 As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, "does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honored with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence." Source

Sola Scriptura holds the position that the Scriptures alone are the final authority of all matters of faith and practice.

2 Timothy 3:16-17
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

God's word alone is pure and uncontaminated. It is infallible. It is God's Word.

John 17:17
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

Grace you accurately quote, " 2 Timothy 3:16-17, All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

Unfortunately, for your interpretation/point of view on that Scripture passage is wrong, In fact, you distort it's meaning. You don't want to hear this but, it says 'All Scripture' and definitely not 'Only Scripture. HUGE DIFFERENCE. I agree that all Scripture is God's truth, Bible/Old Testament/New Testament. No question about that.

As an analogy, if a person is studying to be a doctor, the Professor may teach him/her that the study of ALL ANATOMY will help you to be a good doctor. But that's surely not the same as saying ONLY the study of Anatomy will help you be a good doctor. NOT THE SAME AT ALL.

But you are trying to get the Scripture to say ONLY SCRIPTURE and it clearly does not. Paul clearly tells us that Sola Scriptura is not true in 2 Thessalonians :15, So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter. For sure Paul is telling us that the unwritten traditions are truth also.

Furthermore, according to the apostle Paul, in 1 Timothy 3:15, the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth. The Church is the very foundation upon which the Truth rests.

Grace, you are trying to distort God's word that 'All Scripture' and make us believe that it should read 'Only Scripture' and it doesn't, It clearly doesn't.

Scripture, Paul, and the Bible clearly indicate that Sola Scriptura is not true.

The law is OT not NT. No one can obey the entire law, that's why Jesus came.

Paul himself answered this question rhetorically when he said "Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?"

Careful reading of Paul's epistles will show that he based his teachings on what Christ taught him.

And Jesus wouldn't necessarily contradict Himself. One must consider the different types of audiences that Jesus (and Paul) spoke or wrote to.

Are you not attempting to distort the meaning of 2 Thessalonians 2:15 to suggest Paul is saying the tradition of Roman Catholicism and the dictates of the pope are equal in authority with the Scriptures, as it pertains to faith?

1 Corinthians 4:6
I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favor of one against another.

Grace, Sola Scriptura means Scripture alone. Firstly, there was no Bible, Old and New Testament, for over300 years after Jesus ascended. So the Bible couldn't have been the authority during that time span. The Bible was compiled around the year 314AD. Secondly, there were no printing presses until the 1500s, so bibles had to be painstakingly copied by hand and they were so rare the public generally didn't have access to them. Thirdly, the printing press began mass producing Bibles, but unfortunately there were no public schools for those not of the aristocracy, so over 90% of the public couldn't read or write until the 1800s.. So, the Bible couldn't have been the primary source of Gods word, people didn't have access to it.

Sola Scriptura is completely non Biblical. In itself it is completely a man made tradition and nothing more:

The phrase Sola Scriptura originated out of the 16th century Protestant Reformation. Sola Scriptura is one of the Five Solas. The Five Solas are statements that became the slogans of the Reformation and are now seen as core tenets of the faith.

Going back to Sola Scriptura for example, Jesus never said sola scriptura in any gospel. Paul, Peter, James and John never wrote sola scriptura. The Apostolic Church, since the first century never said sola scriptura. Sola scriptura was a man made tradition from the Protestant Reformation.

The funny thing about the doctrine of Sola Scripture is that it is an oxymoron. It claims 'Scripture Only' but the very idea of Sola Scriptura is a man made tradition and not Scriptural at all.

The Roman Catholic Church holds the erroneous and heretical position that their tradition and dictates of the pope are equal with the authority of Scripture. A blasphemous position.

"82 As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, "does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honored with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence." Source

Sola Scriptura holds the position that the Scriptures alone are the final authority of all matters of faith and practice.

2 Timothy 3:16-17
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

God's word alone is pure and uncontaminated. It is infallible. It is God's Word.

John 17:17
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

Grace you accurately quote, " 2 Timothy 3:16-17, All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

Unfortunately, for your interpretation/point of view on that Scripture passage is wrong, In fact, you distort it's meaning. You don't want to hear this but, it says 'All Scripture' and definitely not 'Only Scripture. HUGE DIFFERENCE. I agree that all Scripture is God's truth, Bible/Old Testament/New Testament. No question about that.

As an analogy, if a person is studying to be a doctor, the Professor may teach him/her that the study of ALL ANATOMY will help you to be a good doctor. But that's surely not the same as saying ONLY the study of Anatomy will help you be a good doctor. NOT THE SAME AT ALL.

But you are trying to get the Scripture to say ONLY SCRIPTURE and it clearly does not. Paul clearly tells us that Sola Scriptura is not true in 2 Thessalonians :15, So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter. For sure Paul is telling us that the unwritten traditions are truth also.

Furthermore, according to the apostle Paul, in 1 Timothy 3:15, the Church is the pillar and ground of the truth. The Church is the very foundation upon which the Truth rests.

Grace, you are trying to distort God's word that 'All Scripture' and make us believe that it should read 'Only Scripture' and it doesn't, It clearly doesn't.

Scripture, Paul, and the Bible clearly indicate that Sola Scriptura is not true.

Are you not attempting to distort the meaning of 2 Thessalonians 2:15 to suggest Paul is saying the tradition of Roman Catholicism and the dictates of the pope are equal in authority with the Scriptures, as it pertains to faith?

1 Corinthians 4:6
I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favor of one against another.

Grace, Sola Scriptura means Scripture alone. Firstly, there was no Bible, Old and New Testament, for over300 years after Jesus ascended. So the Bible couldn't have been the authority during that time span. The Bible was compiled around the year 314AD. Secondly, there were no printing presses until the 1500s, so bibles had to be painstakingly copied by hand and they were so rare the public generally didn't have access to them. Thirdly, the printing press began mass producing Bibles, but unfortunately there were no public schools for those not of the aristocracy, so over 90% of the public couldn't read or write until the 1800s.. So, the Bible couldn't have been the primary source of Gods word, people didn't have access to it.

Sola Scriptura is completely non Biblical. In itself it is completely a man made tradition and nothing more:

The phrase Sola Scriptura originated out of the 16th century Protestant Reformation. Sola Scriptura is one of the Five Solas. The Five Solas are statements that became the slogans of the Reformation and are now seen as core tenets of the faith.

Going back to Sola Scriptura for example, Jesus never said sola scriptura in any gospel. Paul, Peter, James and John never wrote sola scriptura. The Apostolic Church, since the first century never said sola scriptura. Sola scriptura was a man made tradition from the Protestant Reformation.

The funny thing about the doctrine of Sola Scripture is that it is an oxymoron. It claims 'Scripture Only' but the very idea of Sola Scriptura is a man made tradition and not Scriptural at all.

Obviously you can only respond with the same spiel about the solas and don't wish to engage in any kind of discussion here.
Got it!

Your redundant posts here remind me of the General insurance commercial with Shaq and Michael buffer.
Ok, Michael I get it. LOL

Just to make a point, paul never met Jesus... just saying. I also add that paul did not add anything to what Jesus son of GOD thought us. paul was more busy spreading his own gospel. Jesus preached to all, Jews and gentiles. He thought about the Law in the temple and he also came to preach the kingdom of GOD and redeemed us for our sins.

Blessings,

JF

Just to make a point, paul never met Jesus

Only new age religion folks believe that......The law is the law...under the NC/NT ....also.

Grace, Sola Scriptura means Scripture alone. Firstly, there was no Bible, Old and New Testament, for over300 years after Jesus ascended. So the Bible couldn't have been the authority during that time span. The Bible was compiled around the year 314AD. Secondly, there were no printing presses until the 1500s, so bibles had to be painstakingly copied by hand and they were so rare the public generally didn't have access to them. Thirdly, the printing press began mass producing Bibles, but unfortunately there were no public schools for those not of the aristocracy, so over 90% of the public couldn't read or write until the 1800s.. So, the Bible couldn't have been the primary source of Gods word, people didn't have access to it.

Some Christians believe that the four primary Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were meant for the Jews. Of course, these Gospels are the Gospels in which Jesus teaches and performs His ministry. Some gentile Christians believe that only the New Testament teachings of Paul are meant for them, as Paul was appointed to be the Apostle to the Gentiles.

In a nutshell, some Christians believe that only portions of the New Testament pertain to them. So, when you have differences in what Jesus and Paul teach, then they side with Paul.

If that is true, then pray tell, WHO was he conversing with on the road
to Damascus?:

Act 9:4 And he fell to the earth, and heard A Voice Saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me?
Act 9:5 And he said, Who art thou, LORD? And The LORD Said, I AM JESUS Whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Act 9:6 And he trembling and astonished said, LORD, what wilt Thou have me to do? And The LORD Said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.

Are you Sure he was talking with Someone he never met?

GRACE And Peace...

GOD IS a SPIRIT and HE met Paul on the road to Damascus.

Only new age religion folks believe that......The law is the law...under the NC/NT ....also.

You don't understand the doctrine the Lord Jesus taught in the gospels.
We are no longer under that Law when we come to the Lord Jesus. We are under His Grace.

But not for the Christian... we don't live by the law anymore.

Kosher diet? No pork and shellfish?

I didn't say it was different. I said no one can keep the law perfectly. That is why there was animal sacrifice. It covered sin, but it did not take it away. But Jesus came and fulfilled the law. He is the sacrifice, we no longer kill animals for their blood. His blood washes away sin, it doesn't simply "cover" it.