Angels can procreate

We will eat and drink in heaven, so why not sex?

the whole issue is that we don’t first read the things we’re explaining

“which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.”
‭‭Luke‬ ‭3:38‬ ‭KJV‬‬

When God created all creation he made one final creation to rule over what he had made he made this particular creature in a distinct way different from any other creature the lord had made

“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭1:26-28‬ ‭KJV‬‬

this is the origin and meaning of the terminology “ the sons of God “ they are the single and only creature created in his image and likeness.

God having to sons isnt the same as when a man has a son through pro creation , Gods children are those he created in his image and likeness and gave freedom and dominion on earth and rule over all the other creatures of earth just as God the father rules all of heaven , man his son is meant to rule all the earth in his nature of goodness and truth and peace for life and not death as man has done

angels were never made in Gods image , God never created an earthly physical Body for them because of this

“being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance ( children inherit ) obtained a more excellent name than they.

For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, This day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, And he shall be to me a Son?

And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.

And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, And his ministers a flame of fire.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭1:4-7‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Hebrews one alone seperates men from angels in that very thing angels aren’t the children of God but his spiritual heavenly servants who worship Jesus the son of God

christians are born into the body of Christ as the sons of God through true worship of the true God found in the gospel

Hebrews two then Further cements the seperation of the two creatures distinction again being who the children are

“Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; ( why he became flesh )that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;


For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; ( Jesus the son didn’t become like an angel but the seed of a particular man ) but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭2:14, 16-17‬ ‭KJV‬‬

It’s also why angels aren’t the ones being redeemed and offered salvation from sin .

The sons of God were the line of Seth

rhe daughters of men they married were the children of cain who had already been cast out of Gods people and began his own city.

God wants his people to marry and find his people it’s why he forbade intermarriage between israel and other nations who worshipped other gods It’s still not a good idea for instance for a Christian man to seek out and find a witch to marry it’s always going to lead the good astray and corrupt

https://www.gotquestions.org/strange-flesh.html

You have criticised the Greek Septuagint as being corrupt and inaccurate, then preceded to supply a totally farcical translation of the Hebrew as being more correct, For example: I bolded the Hebrew for you.

בְּנֵ֤י
bə-nê the sons

הָֽאֱלֹהִים֙
hā-’ĕ-lō-hîm of God

To divine beings cohabitating with human woman. Who translated this to English for you? I mean if one believes sons of God are divine beings they cant take license to change Gods Word to what they think it means, they should stick to the original which is what God intended even if its ambiguous.

Anyway in Hebrew or Greek or English it still says the same thing, Giants or Nephilim if you prefer were on the earth in those days and also afterwards.

it's bunkum

Clayman said:
You have criticised the Greek Septuagint as being corrupt and inaccurate, then preceded to supply a totally farcical translation of the Hebrew as being more correct, For example: I bolded the Hebrew for you.

בְּנֵ֤י
bə-nê the sons

הָֽאֱלֹהִים֙
hā-’ĕ-lō-hîm of God

To divine beings cohabitating with human woman. Who translated this to English for you? I mean if one believes sons of God are divine beings they cant take license to change Gods Word to what they think it means, they should stick to the original which is what God intended even if its ambiguous.

Anyway in Hebrew or Greek or English it still says the same thing, Giants or Nephilim if you prefer were on the earth in those days and also afterwards.

When the angels were in Sodom and Gomorrah collecting Lot


Interesting, thank you. I love closer looks at scripture and realize this view is the generally accepted one, or at least the historically adopted one. After being equipped with the knowledge that the original word translated as "strange" is hetero, I searched "flesh" in scripture to determine if any distinctions and came to 1 Cor 15:39 contain mention of it, "Not all flesh (sarx) is the same: Men have one kind of flesh, animals have another, birds another, and fish another," and notice only natural examples are provided there. Then in the next verse, as it appears to me, a transition is made into the subject and comparison of bodies (soma), and these include the sun and the stars as possessing their own "kind" of body, and wonder why no other body has ever taken on the form of the moon, not even just for kix....
Anyway, I wonder if "strange flesh" might insinuate things such as people joke about happening in the foothills or the back alleys of Tiauna, as that would be the natural progression once man(kind) become 'bored' with what would otherwise become ordinary flesh to them.

I have heard repeatedly in church that angels cannot procreate. That is not true, according to the bible.

"when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown." Genesis 6:4. It had nothing to do with them being fallen angels. They were able to have children.

You have criticised the Greek Septuagint as being corrupt and inaccurate

This isn't intriguing, new and exciting, it doesn't sell books and movies, but it is the truth, plain and simple.

Thank you and Amen!

This is the only passage in which your interpretation might be entertained. However, if you trace the geneologies in the previous chapters, the "sons of God" are the believers in the line of Seth from Adam, and the "daughters of humans" are the unbelievers in the line from Cain, all of whom intermarried except for Noah's family and were corrupted.

Actually we don't know if we will eat & drink in heaven. We can reasonably deduce that we will eat & drink after our resurrection.
Jesus was quite clear we won't be marrying. There is no reason to assume we will be having orgies for 1000 years while Jesus reigns.

I'm asking you to imagine a state of being where you don't need nor even think about sex. You are a new creature (physically)
You don't have hormones driving you crazy. I'm not going to say I know for sure, we are given very little information about
our future immortal state. We do know it will be good though. If you won't even consider an existence without those carnal
desires you can't look forward. You can only look to being locked into the same dilemma you have now for eternity.

Think outside the box (so to speak)

Jesus said there is no marriage in heaven. You don't need to be married to have sex.

Jesus said there is no marriage in heaven. You don't need to be married to have sex.

I've always been curious about the Seth-Cain bloodline hypotheses of the sons of God because even after it being explained we're always left hanging out there with identifying exactly who is this evil race of people we are not suppose to marry and bare children with. Is there a identification process that you can see as to who is the race of people on the planet who are of Seth and who is of Cain?

So were the daughters of Cain really ugly?

non believing wicked and rebellious people driven by lusts of the flesh

^ There is your answer, John...

Jesus said there is no marriage in heaven. You don't need to be married to have sex.

Isn't sex outside marriage sin? Is there sin in heaven?

Are you surprised?

I've already tried asking him this about 3 different times.

He just goes back to his default answers and never addresses these questions.

He seems to think that as long as you have the parts, it will be ok to use them, and apparently even with angels.