At least you are
civil about it - and, that is always nice to see.
I would rather have a discussion - and, simply disagree where necessary and appropriate - than to have an argument - so, your approach is appreciated.
Keep in mind that I am talking about 'dispensational
ism' as a
method of
analysis that may lead
interpretation astray. (Because, it
does.)
The distinction/separation of these things is clear enough in the scriptures without a man-made 'mechanism' (which, in its base definition, is an 'instrument' or 'device' that utilizes 'structure' and 'organization' to create a 'framework' for learning) to be a 'container' for the same. The problem is, the 'shape' of that 'framework' is often 'preformed'
externally (without scripture as the guide). And, the next thing you know - you have
invented a 'Great Tribulation' [period] that has/is its own 'dispensation' - which does not exist in scripture.
Whether you realize it or not -
dispensationalism is a man-made lens...
If scripture does not "speak it directly" - it is man-made. Period.