The Error of KJV-Onlyism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,502
13,806
113
Example of hebrew homonym is elohim
How so? Does the single word have multiple origins? I suspect not. Rather, it is simply a word used for several things within a single category.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
786
304
63
Where, In Scripture, does It say I have to be a "foreign language scholar," When
The Omnipotent God [ that I know ] Preserved His Pure, Perfect, and Holy Word,
for me [ His child ], in my own language? He not only Sent The Blessed Teacher,
The Holy Spirit, Specified Certain study rules, But, Also Much More about:

Handling His Precious Word Of Life!

Amen.
Why not study the original language? We have at least one KJVonly person participating on this thread that believes in the false doctrine of loss of salvation. The original language puts even more emphasis on the truth of eternal security of the believer.

JOH 5:24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My Word, and believes Him Who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.”

"Truly,truly" is a sentential participle. It puts emphasis on what is being said. A point of doctrine. Pay very close attention, because this will be attacked by the kingdom of darkness! It's a tremendously important point of doctrine.


"does not come into judgement" ~~ kai eis krisin ouk erchetai[and into judgment not comes] Notice 'ouk' in the phrase. When it is joined to a verb(judgement), it is used to strongly deny that this will NEVER NO,NEVER happen to the subject. The believer emphatically NEVER comes into judgement, not ever.

erchetai~~~~ comes. It is in the present tense.........This habitually continues to be true. And it is in the middle voice,indicating that someone else did the work and the subject(believer) benefits from it.

All this is at our finger tips. Why not utilize it? It helps us to defend the Faith and it helps us grow in His grace and knowledge. We can't get this 'bonus' material from reading English.

https://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Greek_Index.htm
https://www.preceptaustin.org/
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,502
13,806
113
Why not study the original language? We have at least one KJVonly person participating on this thread that believes in the false doctrine of loss of salvation. The original language puts even more emphasis on the truth of eternal security of the believer.

JOH 5:24 “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My Word, and believes Him Who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.”

"Truly,truly" is a sentential participle. It puts emphasis on what is being said. A point of doctrine. Pay very close attention, because this will be attacked by the kingdom of darkness! It's a tremendously important point of doctrine.


"does not come into judgement" ~~ kai eis krisin ouk erchetai[and into judgment not comes] Notice 'ouk' in the phrase. When it is joined to a verb(judgement), it is used to strongly deny that this will NEVER NO,NEVER happen to the subject. The believer emphatically NEVER comes into judgement, not ever.

erchetai~~~~ comes. It is in the present tense.........This habitually continues to be true. And it is in the middle voice,indicating that someone else did the work and the subject(believer) benefits from it.

All this is at our finger tips. Why not utilize it? It helps us to defend the Faith and it helps us grow in His grace and knowledge. We can't get this 'bonus' material from reading English.

https://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Greek_Index.htm
https://www.preceptaustin.org/
Y'know, if these KJV-only types start doing their homework, learning the original languages, and getting proper understanding of the text, they're going to stop arguing in favour of the KJV and get on with being decent Christian folks. Are you sure that's what you want?

;)
 

GRACE_ambassador

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2021
3,222
1,618
113
Midwest
All this is at our finger tips.
Thanks, I'm glad you able to utilize such tools For Emphasis.
But, some of us are simpletons, eh?

And, my spanish-speaking 'amigos' would give me strange looks, if I started to
tell them "Way More ( Hebrew and Greek ) information" than a simple English
to Spanish conversation, that being Enough language 'scholarship' for them,
being simpletons also, eh?

Does God Really Want His Simple Will to be turned in Complexity, since
even "trained theologians" can't even agree with each other? :cry:

Where is the "bonus material" of The Simplicity of Christ?

Amen.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
786
304
63
Thanks, I'm glad you able to utilize such tools For Emphasis.
But, some of us are simpletons, eh?

And, my spanish-speaking 'amigos' would give me strange looks, if I started to
tell them "Way More ( Hebrew and Greek ) information" than a simple English
to Spanish conversation, that being Enough language 'scholarship' for them,
being simpletons also, eh?

Does God Really Want His Simple Will to be turned in Complexity, since
even "trained theologians" can't even agree with each other? :cry:

Where is the "bonus material" of The Simplicity of Christ?

Amen.
I can barely spell my own name. I'm a contractor that builds houses. I think you can do it.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,870
4,332
113
mywebsite.us
..............
Amplified is very close, it's good to get a Bible that has at least 2 versions or even 4 is better...then you can read the verse in several translations....But let's face it...if you don't have God helping you to understand ANY version, you probably won't get what's being said or understand it. God's word and His Holy Spirit is so powerful and amazing it can communicate the message to your heart and spirit..no matter what the translations. I challenge you to read through the entire KJV Old and New testaments a couple times, praying for God to open up your understanding to the Word of God....Then I think you can make comments and move on. You have to put the footwork in.
I am really not sure where all of this came from... o_O :unsure:

The KJV has been my study Bible all of my life. I grew up with it.

The Holy Spirit has been helping me understand the KJV for decades.

Anyone who is a member of this site may make comments as they wish.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Y'know, if these KJV-only types start doing their homework, learning the original languages, and getting proper understanding of the text, they're going to stop arguing in favour of the KJV and get on with being decent Christian folks. Are you sure that's what you want?

;)

Just curious though,,,if they do in 1465BCE,(approx) when Moses wrote those books wouldn't he have written them in Proto Sinaitic or Paleo Hebrew script and not the modern Hebrew? Not that I'm a KJV only thinker, I'm not just that the oldest copies we have were translated into the Hebrew we have today...
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
dearest, you may know him best as Darth Vader from the first Star Wars film.

you are in my prayers always. ♥
I wanted to say this to you while I can, due to my health and circumstances I do not know how long I have left I have almost died seven times in the year 2023 and part of me can hear the church bells the other part speaks of life and the ability to give it in abundence the church bells ring of death it is a solem and almost emotionless sound but at the same time I feel a fire not a normal one when I first encountered the holy spirit I saw him as a flame made of raindow colors the colors themsevles were not just vivid but they themselves seemed to burn

If you as his child touched it would start from your hand flowing to your arm and consumming you entire it is full of this energy that makes your soul quicken awaken shoot up

But for the enemy for the darkness it burns them intensely it scorches them inside and out they cannot stand his holy pure cleansing flame

But even more than this I want to express to you how very much you have helped me.
I have never known a mothers love before you and as cheesy and embarrising that may sound not everyone had an actual mother anyone reading my testimony knows how my life began in fact it was one of the worst cases of abuse in texas I even recalled memories I buried later in my life reminding me of the sexual abuse the satanic rituals and many other things that are not appropriate to speak online

I am 33 but am no means that age mentally if age is just a number then I am living proof I am by no means an adult not ust because of the brain damage but because it has always just been who I am people tell me I have a sense of innocence about me I am a child in every sense of the word if you saw me in real life you might mistake me for a teenager

perhaps this was designed maybe I was meant to to experience the world of an adult but yet retain the heart of a child but even psycological studies have shown the damage of a child growing up without a mother it is the same idea of motherly instincts but in reverse

Even though I am not blood and with my age you took me on as your son at least online but if we were in person I would hug you so hard it may be pathetic in some eyes but some peoplemay see something more something past that blood age what does that matter in the same way a mother with motherly instincts does not decide who is their child a child doesn't consider blood or age as to is their mother and sadly I am not like most people
i am not afraid to speak my heart and it often times seems odd or strange but whether I pass away or he allows me to keep going I wanted to tell you how much it means to me the wounds that are being mended by you taking me in as your own whether by guestere an online only relationship or actually accepteing me as your own I got a taste of what
i never knewand I am sorry I was never blood had I had someone like you growing up I would not be so severely damaged as I am but your actual children are blessed
 

NightTwister

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2023
2,107
793
113
65
Colorado, USA
But I got motive. Your side accuses us falsely that we worship the KJB (all because we believe the Bible is perfect).
Modern Bibles conveniently downgrade the importance of how God views His Word so we cannot quote this verse back to them with them even regarding this verse. Their Bible has demoted the importance of God’s Word which conveniently fits their viewpoint of the word.
Your motive is to try to convince yourself that somehow your arguments aren't logical fallacies. It works for you, but no one else except those also deceived.
 

NightTwister

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2023
2,107
793
113
65
Colorado, USA
A true example of a homonym:

The bark of the dog echoed up the tree at the squirrel who was hanging on the bark of the tree at the top near the branches.

So the word “bark” in this sentence is a homonym.
The examples I gave are also true homonyms. You seem to have difficulty with many language rules.
 
Apr 27, 2023
538
39
28
How so? Does the single word have multiple origins? I suspect not. Rather, it is simply a word used for several things within a single category.
It comes from the "Aramaic" EL. Keep in mind the New Testament calls Hebrew-- the "Aramaic" quotes that it has.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
so true friend

Wise words from our father. Nice to see you back too.. and good to see you back to your best 😊
Oh believe me I am by no means at my best I am in a very dark place a place of uncertanty my life may become much worse or if God intervenes it could be for the better I have never needed a miracle more than now

But I am here I am willing even at my worst to be honest I am worn weary I struggle to even do anything anymore not only physically but any aspect you can think I knew the cost I still stand by everything I said from the start but I have also never known this level of spiritual warfare

even the strongest of warriors have their limits and if no one is there to catch you when you fall to help you stand again then will always show how we ourselves are not enough no one wins a war by a single strong warrior but the streght of others the companions the bonds forged

I have no such bonds no companions to catch me so I am broken and defeated like I am now all I have is him
So if I speak of anything good it is not because I am ok but as I always say to him I am here I am willing use me.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,502
13,806
113
Just curious though,,,if they do in 1465BCE,(approx) when Moses wrote those books wouldn't he have written them in Proto Sinaitic or Paleo Hebrew script and not the modern Hebrew? Not that I'm a KJV only thinker, I'm not just that the oldest copies we have were translated into the Hebrew we have today...
I guess it's possible; I don't know the relevant dates. :)
 

Bible_Highlighter

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2023
2,073
336
83
I don't know why I bother trying to explain Scripture to you when you struggle with basic grammar.

A homonym is a single thing, not a 'they' which is plural.
Yes, I should have changed "they have" to "has," to maintain grammatical agreement between the singular noun "homonym" and its singular verb "has."

So I should have said, "A homonym is a word that looks and sounds the same but has different meanings."

But let's be fair here. Please spell-check the spelling and grammar of all the non-KJB-only folks in this thread here, too. I am sure they would love it.

You said:
You might say "Homonyms are words that look and sound the same but have different meanings" which is basically the dictionary definition. An example is "seal" which is both a marine animal and guard against leaks. "Book" and "scroll" are not homonyms.
*Sigh* Uh, no. I was not saying "Book" and "Scroll" are related homonyms. I was saying that the word "Book" can have different meanings, and scroll can be one of those definitions. If you were paying attention, I gave some examples of some homonyms in this thread like the word "repent." I am saying that the word "book" is like this:

1. Book (Noun): A written work or composition that is considered a classic or exemplary in its field.
Example: "'To Kill a Mockingbird' is a classic book in American literature."

2. Book (Verb): To detain or arrest someone, especially a suspect.
Example: "The police decided to book the suspect after questioning."

3. Book (Verb): To reserve or schedule something in advance.
Example: "I would like to book a table for two at the restaurant."

4. Book (Verb): To move quickly; to run or rush.
Example: "He decided to book it to the bus stop before it started raining."

5. Book (Noun): Scroll.
Example: "In the dimly lit archive, the archivist carefully cataloged each book,
preserving the knowledge contained within the aged scrolls."

These are examples of the word "book" being a homonym.

You said:
And more than just those two.
It was just meant to be a quick example. I was not writing a book, no pun intended.

You said:
No, it isn't. You simply have the wrong word for the concept. A homonym is a single word, not a phrase.
Honestly. How many people even know that?

But great. It's a "triple homophone" or "trihomograph."

You said:
I assure you, it isn't. The context is about wild beasts that take over the land of Idumea after it is destroyed under the Lord's wrath.
In his video, Brandon Peterson actually points out the verses in Revelation.

Isaiah 34 is talking about nations, which would be Gentile nations.




Looking at Isaiah 34:4, we can see that it parallels Revelation 6:13-14.




Isaiah 34:10 matches up with Revelation 19:3.



Isaiah 34:13-15 lines up with Revelation 18:2, and the unclean birds (fowl) in Leviticus 11:13-17.



Really, the video is a thousand times more informative.

 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
I guess it's possible; I don't know the relevant dates. :)

In 14'th century BCE(Moses lifetime) in that area there was Egyptian Hieroglyphic, Proto Sinaitic,Paleo Phoenician ect. but Paleo Hebrew(we refer to as Biblical Hebrew) was not used for another 4 hundred years or so after Moses died in the 10th century BCE(times of David,Saul,Samuel ect)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Sinaitic_script
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Hebrew#Phonology
https://www.biblestudy.org/beginner/timelineot.html
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
Hi Blain,

It's lunch for me and found the audio Bible that I lost in bookmarks a while back.
I read the Bible out loud every day to practice for a recording like this. It's a big goal for me, because I want to be a blessing to many others. Here's an old recording of the most famous audio KJV recording. I've had others, including Darth Vader reading the Bible; Lol, James Earl Jones. It would have been better without the mask and scary breathing though.

Of all, Alexander Scourby is my favorite reader. You'll want to either download or bookmark this. If voices are able to be CR, I think his copyright would have expired by now since he died. The book isn't, unlike the other versions. Many hours of blessings my friend.
☕🙂📖

https://earnestlycontendingforthefaith.com/ListenToTheKingJamesBible.html
no way you even darth vadar reading the bible? oh boy if I wanted to listen to the word before the starwars geek in me is even more excitied that could actually bring a lot people to listen to his word and be saved did you know there is a section in nasa called c3po? the world is ruled by nerds and geeks it is awesome.
 

HealthAndHappiness

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2022
10,309
4,356
113
Almost Heaven West Virginia
no way you even darth vadar reading the bible? oh boy if I wanted to listen to the word before the starwars geek in me is even more excitied that could actually bring a lot people to listen to his word and be saved did you know there is a section in nasa called c3po? the world is ruled by nerds and geeks it is awesome.
I never heard of C3PO. That's hilarious!

I just made up the joke about Darth Vader/ JE Jones, but I think someone beat me to that . 😄

Here's the whole gospel of John I just found.

 

Bible_Highlighter

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2023
2,073
336
83
You are clearly unaware of the history behind the KJV. Please, go and do your homework. Start with Desiderius Erasmus and his five editions of the Greek text. Move on to the work of Robert Estienne (aka Stephanus), and Theodore Beza, and their work in revising the Greek text, Finally, look at the KJV translators in using all of these and many more in preparing the KJV. Then, when you have actualy done your homework, then come back and talk to us about "constantly questioning and criticizing the text". Until then, you're blathering in sheer ignorance.
Erasmus was committed to the idea of ad fontes, or going back to the original sources, to understand and study the Scriptures. His work involved comparing various manuscripts of the New Testament and using his linguistic skills to create a more reliable and authentic text. While he was critical of certain aspects of the existing Latin Vulgate translation, he did not oppose the preservation of the Scriptures but rather sought to improve the accuracy of the biblical text.

The difference between the Modern Textual Critic and those men who were trying to translate texts from previous manuscripts of the past is that the Modern Textual Critic does not believe in the Preservation of Scripture and they see the text as in a constant state of evolution. The sea of 900 Modern Bibles proves that the Modern Textual Critic's goal is money or having a job and or notoriety. You would think by now they would have a one-settled text that they can all agree upon. Many of them do use the Nestle and Aland, but even that changes every few years. No end in sight in what the text says and all Bibles have errors in them. This is the state of Modern Textual Criticism and it will never end. No Bible will ever truly exist that they can call the "Book of the Lord."
 

Bible_Highlighter

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2023
2,073
336
83
The examples I gave are also true homonyms. You seem to have difficulty with many language rules.
To be fair, I believe you need to correct English for those who are not KJB Only here.
I am sure they would appreciate it.
 

HealthAndHappiness

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2022
10,309
4,356
113
Almost Heaven West Virginia
Interesting fact:

I just found out that some people actually believe that Shakespeare wrote the KJ :oops:
A lot of people read Shakespeare too.
I have yet to find as many whine and complain about it being too hard to read.
There are still plays performed using the early scripts.
The issue isn't that the KJV needs to be dumbed down for those who are nearly illiterate. I think it reasonable if they simply try to learn how to read and expand their vocabulary.