I have no trouble with the Angels in the OT scripture being Angels.. There are Angels of God and there are Angels in league with satan.. The book of Revelations reveals that 1/3rd of the Angels will join satan in combat against the Angel Micheal and his Angels in heaven and will be defeated.. I also have no problem with the guidance in the NT about always being courteous to strangers because you never know when one of those strangers will be an Angel in disguise..
Well, the trouble with angels is as follows (which is now on our website in the Lesson on controversial issues):
It is rather difficult to jibe the role of angels with the role of the Holy Spirit (HS) in the Bible, so let us explore that question starting from
Hebrews 1:14, “Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?” Does this teaching not conflict with the ministry of the HS described in the Gospel of John as our advocate (14:16-17), the testifier about Jesus (15:26) and guide (16:12-15)? I am aware that the word ‘angel’ simply means messenger, and that the Bible calls angels men in several places in the Bible, and I find references to either angels or the HS in the NT, but
are there any places that describe them working together?
The main reason I wonder about angels is because
1TM 2:3-5 teaches that there is only one mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus, probably addressing the gnostic religions of that day, which viewed angels as mediators between man and God. Thus,
perhaps we should think of OT angels as akin to (or functioning in a way similar to) the Mosaic Sacrificial Law: The Law foreshadowed the Gospel, and the angels foreshadowed the Holy Spirit. The roles of angels and the HS are not very different, and the mediatory role of angels seems comparable with the problem of celebrating Christmas and Easter with Santa and the Bunny, because their personalities and roles compete with glorifying the person and work of Jesus.
Why not credit the HS with helping souls in every way? I understand that the HS is the Comforter, so why are ministering angels needed? (It seems like too many cooks in the kitchen :^)
Part of the reason for considering this interpretation of Scripture is because there are some who say that angels work to impart God’s graces to us. Also, there are those who think that praying to the angels and devotion toward them is a good practice.
Although there is Scripture supporting belief in angels, this opens up a can of worms about which God’s Word is vague. Do angels have moral free will and thus need God’s salvation, or are they robotic and thus viewable as mere extensions of God’s HS, so we should only glorify them with that understanding? I perceive that
the hypothesis “angels should grow less as the HS is glorified in the church era” (between Acts and REV) is comparable to the person and role of John with regard to Jesus in JN 3:30, and so folks might consider whether the OT angels were actually manifestations of the HS described by souls before revelation per the NT that God is Triune.
Interpreting angelology in the OT in light of the NT following the examples of Jesus and Paul, angels can be viewed as preparing the way for the Gospel of Christ. The Law of Moses revealed our sinfulness, the Sacrificial System pointed to Christ’s atonement, some of the prophets revealed that God’s Plan of Salvation (POS) included the Gentiles, and angels may have manifested the HS. Thus, as John said with regard to Jesus in JN 3:30, and just as the NT superseded the OT per Hebrews 7-9, perhaps we should allow the angels to become less important as the Holy Spirit becomes greater, and wait until heaven to understand how angels fit into God’s POS, (along with other problematic passages in the Bible, such as baptism for the dead).
It is not a matter of replacing the angels but of keeping them in their proper place. Like problematic gifts per 1CR 12:30-14:1, perhaps the role of messenger has ceased for angels and been replaced by the Holy Spirit.
This understanding is not taught explicitly in the NT, but there are the hints and implications that have been cited. Most scriptural statements about angels seem unclear, so it is better to celebrate the Holy Spirit, about whom much is clearly taught in the NT, while understand that Satan is the evil angel/spirit of evil, whom should be despised. Occam’s Razor is not a verse in the Bible, but
affirming that the Holy Spirit may be the holy angels/spirits of the OT, who do God’s will because they ARE the one God perceived as diversified (whereas in truth He is Triune), is theologically simpler or applies the hermeneutical principle of interpreting the unclear passages by applying the more clear biblical teachings. In this way the role of the HS crowds out angels or makes them/their role superfluous
during the church era, so churches should not elevate/glorify angels.