Loss of salvation???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Refuting the Arminian Delusion: Why Salvation Cannot Be Lost

The popular Arminian theory argues that salvation is a conditional tightrope—a fragile state that a believer can forfeit through subsequent sin, backsliding, or a lapse into unbelief. But when laid alongside the finished cross-work of Christ, this view completely crumbles.

To claim that a child of God can be eternally lost requires you to assert three blasphemous premises:
  • You make Christ’s satisfaction incomplete. If an elect person for whom Christ died can still go to hell, then Christ suffered the wrath of God for sins that will be punished a second time in eternity. This reduces the katharismos (purging) of Hebrews 1:3 to a failure.
  • You make the "forever" of Scripture temporary. Hebrews 10:14 explicitly states that Christ "perfected for ever" those for whom the offering was made. If you can lose your salvation, then "forever" does not mean forever, and the word of God has failed.
  • You demand more from the friend than the enemy. This is the ultimate death blow to Arminianism based on Romans 5:10. If God successfully reconciled you to Himself through the death of His Son while you were a blind, hostile enemy in total unbelief, it is logically impossible for Him to cast you off now that you are His justified friend, preserved by the endless life of Christ.

⚓ The Verdict

Arminianism fails because it transforms faith into a human work that maintains salvation, shifting the anchor from the cross to the creature.

But the scriptures stand firm: Your eternal security does not depend on your fickle ability to hold onto God. It depends entirely on the immutable fact that before you ever drew a breath, the blood of Jesus Christ already bought, sealed, perfected, and secured your soul for eternity.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
But the scriptures stand firm: Your eternal security does not depend on your fickle ability to hold onto God. It depends entirely on the immutable fact that before you ever drew a breath, the blood of Jesus Christ already bought, sealed, perfected, and secured your soul for eternity.
But the scriptures stand firm: Your eternal damnation does not depend on your ability to trust in Jesus. It depends entirely on the immutable fact that God before you ever drew a breath, had already refused, denied, withheld and was unwilling to offer the blood of Jesus Christ for your soul for eternity.

This is the lie of Calvinism.

Your theology and mindset is sick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLordIsMyRedeemer
amen no one in the OT was

the gospel did not change, it has always been by grace through faith not of works.

God did not make it hearder by adding a work.. no work has ever saved
Keep in mind.

John the Baptist was water baptizing in what was still a Jewish age.
That is why some called Jesus "rabbi".
 
The thief on the cross who believed in Jesus was not water baptized after he believed.
Don't you think it is important to see that what the thief endured is nearly indentical to what happened to us at our water baptism into Christ, His death, and His resurrection ?
We died together.
We were both buried.
And we both left our tombs as new creatures !
 
You think baptism is the only way to receive God/Jesus/Holy Spirit and have your sins remitted?

Acts 10:43-44

43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.

44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
Weren't Cornelius and his friends water baptized for the remission of their past sins in the next few verses ?
 
Yall are mistaking the word “baptism”. How could Jesus baptize someone with “fire” (and the Holy Spirit)?
The baptism of the Holy Spirit is the same as the gift of the Holy Ghost promised by Peter to the repentant and water baptized in Acts 2:38.
The baptism of fire is the end of the world.
Matt 3:11-12..."I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
12 Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lamar
Don't you think it is important to see that what the thief endured is nearly indentical to what happened to us at our water baptism into Christ, His death, and His resurrection ?
We died together.
We were both buried.
And we both left our tombs as new creatures !
It actually happened to him.
But it does not happen to us in water baptism
Water baptism is only symbolic and represents being crucified and buried.....

That is... unless? Someone fails to pull you back up and out.
Then the symbolism ends rather quickly. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Revelation1v8
It actually happened to him.
But it does not happen to us in water baptism
I disagree.
By faith, the exact sequence of events occur to both the thief and to the truly repentant.
Water baptism is only symbolic and represents being crucified and buried.....
Again I disagree.
It is the actual means of our "immersion" into Christ, into His death, burial, and resurrection.
Romans 6 describes it well.
That is... unless? Someone fails to pull you back up and out.
Then the symbolism ends rather quickly.
I'll leave the hypotheticals to others.
 
But the scriptures stand firm: Your eternal damnation does not depend on your ability to trust in Jesus. It depends entirely on the immutable fact that God before you ever drew a breath, had already refused, denied, withheld and was unwilling to offer the blood of Jesus Christ for your soul for eternity.

This is the lie of Calvinism.

Your theology and mindset is sick.


Lamar, you are completely changing the subject. My post was explicitly about the nature of Christ's death and how it guarantees eternal security for the believer. Instead of addressing my argument, you deflected to an emotional debate about the non-elect.

Let’s pull the conversation back to the actual issue I raised, which you completely avoided.

In Hebrews 10:14, the text says: “For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”

My argument is simple: If Christ offered Himself for a person, He perfected them forever. If they are perfected forever, they are eternally secure and cannot possibly lose their salvation or end up in hell.

Furthermore, you completely dodged my argument on Romans 5:10: “For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.”

If Christ legally reconciled His people to God while they were active enemies in total unbelief, their security does not depend on their fickle ability to hold onto God. It depends on the finished cross-work that never lets them go. You completely ignored how an already-accomplished reconciliation of an enemy guarantees their final preservation.
Deal with the text and the argument I actually made:
  1. Did the blood of Christ successfully perfect forever those He died for? Yes or no?
  2. How can someone whom Christ legally reconciled to God while they were still an active enemy ever be eternally lost?


  3. If a believer can lose their salvation and go to hell, aren't you forcing Scripture to mean that Christ's offering failed to perfect them forever?
Stop avoiding the cross-work of Christ and address Romans 5:10. How can someone whom Christ legally perfected forever ever be eternally lost?
 
Weren't Cornelius and his friends water baptized for the remission of their past sins in the next few verses ?

Personally, I believe that Jesus set rituals/sacraments before people as a means of weeding out the tares from the wheat, much like the Lord's Supper. We all know that there's a certain religious denomination who truly believes that Jesus physically sits in the Eucharist and that the way to keep Jesus living inside of them is to ingest it. That's why the Bible says that there are people who think they are Christians, but are not. We will be judged by our faith first and our works second.
 
You think baptism is the only way to receive God/Jesus/Holy Spirit and have your sins remitted?
This is the error in your thinking. You are confusing cause with moment.

Baptism is not the "way", it is the moment that we receive the remission of sins and the Gift of the Holy Spirit.

Acts 2:38
And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
You are confusing speaking in tongues as the "moment" of salvation, it is not.
The people in Acts 10 were still saved at the moment of baptism, read the next verses.

44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. 45The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on Gentiles. 46 For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God.

Then Peter said, 47 “Surely no one can stand in the way of their being baptized with water. They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have.” 48 So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The promise of the remission of sins is not found in the House of Cornelius but in the words of Peter:

Acts 2:39
The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”
 
The promise of the remission of sins is not found in the House of Cornelius but in the words of Peter:

Acts 2:39
The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”

The promise is forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit, which only Jesus can give, and he's proven that water is not needed to do it. The water rite is a public declaration of what has already happened by grace through faith.

1 Corinthians 12:13 -

For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

1 Corinthians 10:1-4

1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;

2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;

3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;

4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

​

​

 
  • Like
Reactions: BillG
The baptism of the Holy Spirit is the same as the gift of the Holy Ghost promised by Peter to the repentant and water baptized in Acts 2:38.
The baptism of fire is the end of the world.
Matt 3:11-12..."I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
12 Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.
And John 1:33, Luke 11:13

There is a different baptism after salvation and the baptism of water.

This is usually done by the laying on of hands (which seems to be absent from today’s church)
“Then they laid their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit." Acts 8:17

When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied." — Acts 19:6
 
Lamar, you are completely changing the subject.
I did not change the subject, I simply exposed the side of your theology that you and most Calvinist will try to hide.
My post was explicitly about the nature of Christ's death and how it guarantees eternal security for the believer.
Your post was about the guarantee that the unchosen are damned for eternity regardless of the death of Christ. You are just trying to divert people from seeing this.

Instead of addressing my argument, you deflected to an emotional debate about the non-elect.
There is no emotion in my exposing the flip side of your argument.

You cannot present your theology about the inability of the chosen accepting their fate without also accepting the inability of the unchosen accepting their fate.

In Hebrews 10:14, the text says: “For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”

My argument is simple: If Christ offered Himself for a person, He perfected them forever. If they are perfected forever, they are eternally secure and cannot possibly lose their salvation or end up in hell.
Your argument is absurd. To suggest that these 13 words proves that once faithful always saved is not theology but philosophy.
The author of Hebrews is by no means advancing a theology of salvation on election or an unchangeable fate. Talk about reading into a verse.

Furthermore, you completely dodged my argument on Romans 5:10: “For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.”
There is no argument to dodge. You are simply seeing your theology in this verse. If Paul was attempting to convince the reader that their fate is not in their hands, this is a bizarre way to do it.

If Christ legally reconciled His people to God while they were active enemies in total unbelief, their security does not depend on their fickle ability to hold onto God. It depends on the finished cross-work that never lets them go. You completely ignored how an already-accomplished reconciliation of an enemy guarantees their final preservation.
You are again simply rehashing the notion that mankind is not responsible for their own fate. You can spin this anyway you wish but it goes against the desire that God has for all men to know Him.

  1. Did the blood of Christ successfully perfect forever those He died for? Yes or no?
  2. How can someone whom Christ legally reconciled to God while they were still an active enemy ever be eternally lost?


  3. If a believer can lose their salvation and go to hell, aren't you forcing Scripture to mean that Christ's offering failed to perfect them forever?
Whatever your understanding of "perfect" is in these questions, it is not binding Christians to a fate beyond their control.

Stop avoiding the cross-work of Christ and address Romans 5:10. How can someone whom Christ legally perfected forever ever be eternally lost?
The work that was done on the cross was never meant to proclaim the fate of the chosen or the unchosen. It was done to proclaim the Good News that all men can have the hope of salvation.

Calvinism teaches the opposite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Standard
I did not change the subject, I simply exposed the side of your theology that you and most Calvinist will try to hide.

Your post was about the guarantee that the unchosen are damned for eternity regardless of the death of Christ. You are just trying to divert people from seeing this.


There is no emotion in my exposing the flip side of your argument.

You cannot present your theology about the inability of the chosen accepting their fate without also accepting the inability of the unchosen accepting their fate.


Your argument is absurd. To suggest that these 13 words proves that once faithful always saved is not theology but philosophy.
The author of Hebrews is by no means advancing a theology of salvation on election or an unchangeable fate. Talk about reading into a verse.


There is no argument to dodge. You are simply seeing your theology in this verse. If Paul was attempting to convince the reader that their fate is not in their hands, this is a bizarre way to do it.


You are again simply rehashing the notion that mankind is not responsible for their own fate. You can spin this anyway you wish but it goes against the desire that God has for all men to know Him.


Whatever your understanding of "perfect" is in these questions, it is not binding Christians to a fate beyond their control.


The work that was done on the cross was never meant to proclaim the fate of the chosen or the unchosen. It was done to proclaim the Good News that all men can have the hope of salvation.

Calvinism teaches the opposite.

Without realizing it...

Calvinism might have been an attempt to supply fallen angels with an excuse that they did not choose to follow Satan nor to reject God. That God rejected them first.

There would be no justice if the condemned had no choice in what they decided for.
 
Refuting the Arminian Delusion: Why Salvation Cannot Be Lost

The popular Arminian theory argues that salvation is a conditional tightrope—a fragile state that a believer can forfeit through subsequent sin, backsliding, or a lapse into unbelief. But when laid alongside the finished cross-work of Christ, this view completely crumbles.

To claim that a child of God can be eternally lost requires you to assert three blasphemous premises:
  • You make Christ’s satisfaction incomplete. If an elect person for whom Christ died can still go to hell, then Christ suffered the wrath of God for sins that will be punished a second time in eternity. This reduces the katharismos (purging) of Hebrews 1:3 to a failure.
  • You make the "forever" of Scripture temporary. Hebrews 10:14 explicitly states that Christ "perfected for ever" those for whom the offering was made. If you can lose your salvation, then "forever" does not mean forever, and the word of God has failed.
  • You demand more from the friend than the enemy. This is the ultimate death blow to Arminianism based on Romans 5:10. If God successfully reconciled you to Himself through the death of His Son while you were a blind, hostile enemy in total unbelief, it is logically impossible for Him to cast you off now that you are His justified friend, preserved by the endless life of Christ.

⚓ The Verdict

Arminianism fails because it transforms faith into a human work that maintains salvation, shifting the anchor from the cross to the creature.

But the scriptures stand firm: Your eternal security does not depend on your fickle ability to hold onto God. It depends entirely on the immutable fact that before you ever drew a breath, the blood of Jesus Christ already bought, sealed, perfected, and secured your soul for eternity.


Yeah, your next tangent will be "not really saved" because you didn't walk the tightrope.


Calvies and armies are the same.......All RELIGION is the same. Play them out, and they all say the same thing.
 
I did not change the subject, I simply exposed the side of your theology that you and most Calvinist will try to hide.

Your post was about the guarantee that the unchosen are damned for eternity regardless of the death of Christ. You are just trying to divert people from seeing this.


There is no emotion in my exposing the flip side of your argument.

You cannot present your theology about the inability of the chosen accepting their fate without also accepting the inability of the unchosen accepting their fate.


Your argument is absurd. To suggest that these 13 words proves that once faithful always saved is not theology but philosophy.
The author of Hebrews is by no means advancing a theology of salvation on election or an unchangeable fate. Talk about reading into a verse.


There is no argument to dodge. You are simply seeing your theology in this verse. If Paul was attempting to convince the reader that their fate is not in their hands, this is a bizarre way to do it.


You are again simply rehashing the notion that mankind is not responsible for their own fate. You can spin this anyway you wish but it goes against the desire that God has for all men to know Him.


Whatever your understanding of "perfect" is in these questions, it is not binding Christians to a fate beyond their control.


The work that was done on the cross was never meant to proclaim the fate of the chosen or the unchosen. It was done to proclaim the Good News that all men can have the hope of salvation.

Calvinism teaches the opposite.


Lamar, calling the plain declarations of the Holy Spirit “absurd philosophy” is not a refutation. You are dismissing the very texts that define what Christ's death accomplished.

I am not arguing that man has no responsibility. I am arguing that man's response does not make Christ's redemption effective. Rather, Christ's redemption secures the very saving responses God requires.

Let's let the texts speak.

1. Hebrews 10:14 says Christ perfected His people forever​

You say it is absurd to use this passage in arguing for eternal security.

But the Holy Spirit says:

“For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”
Notice the basis:

“by one offering.”

And notice the duration:

“for ever.”

The surrounding context makes the point even stronger:

“By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” —Heb. 10:10
“After he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.” —Heb. 10:12
“For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.” —Heb. 10:14
“Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.” —Heb. 10:18
This is not a tentative sacrifice waiting to discover whether man will make it successful.

One offering.
Once for all.
Perfected forever.
No more offering for sin.


If Christ's one offering actually perfected a person forever, that person cannot finally perish.

2. Romans 5:10 gives the same Legal → Final sequence​

Paul says:

“For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.”
Look at what Paul actually says.

We were enemies.

We were reconciled.

The reconciliation was by the death of His Son.

Being reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.


Paul distinguishes Christ's accomplished work in His death from the subsequent saving work accomplished through His life.

That fits the Five Phases:

Legal: Christ reconciles through His death.

Vital: the Spirit gives spiritual life.

Practical: the regenerated sinner believes, repents, and obeys.

Final: Christ brings His people to complete salvation.

The sinner's later faith does not travel backward and make the Cross effective.

3. And this is why “man must respond” does not answer the argument​

I have never denied that man must believe.

He must.

He must repent.

He must obey.

He must persevere.

But the question is:

Where do those responses ultimately come from?

Scripture does not leave them as independent contributions supplied by autonomous man.

Paul says:

“For unto you it is given... to believe on him.”
—Philippians 1:29
Acts says:

“Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.”
—Acts 11:18
And Paul says:

“For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.”
—Philippians 2:13
So yes:

The sinner believes.
The sinner repents.
The sinner obeys.
The sinner perseveres.


But God gives the faith.

God grants repentance.

God works in the sinner both “to will and to do.”

That means Christ's redemption does not merely purchase a possibility that man may or may not complete.

Christ's redemption secures the very obedience God requires.

Titus 2:14 says Christ:

“gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.”
Look at the purpose:

gave Himself → redeem → purify → zealous of good works.

The practical obedience of His people is among the saving blessings His self-giving was appointed to accomplish.

4. You are reducing the Cross to “opened access”​

You said the Cross successfully “opened up access for forgiveness.”

But Hebrews 9:12 says something much stronger:

“Having obtained eternal redemption for us.”
Christ did not merely open access to redemption.

He obtained eternal redemption.

And Ephesians 1:7 explains that redemption:

“In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.”
So the biblical picture is not:

Christ died → forgiveness became possible → man supplies faith → redemption becomes effective.

It is:

Christ died → Christ obtained eternal redemption → forgiveness is secured → the Spirit gives life → God gives faith and repentance → the sinner believes and obeys.

Faith does not complete Christ.

Christ's redemption produces the response.

5. Your statement that the Cross merely gives “hope of salvation” changes the nature of redemption​

You said:

“The work that was done on the cross... was done to proclaim the Good News that all men can have the hope of salvation.”
But the question is not whether the Gospel offers hope.

Of course it does.

The question is what Christ actually accomplished by His death.

The Bible says:

“Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.”
—Galatians 3:13
“Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree.”
—1 Peter 2:24
“Having obtained eternal redemption for us.”
—Hebrews 9:12
“For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.”
—Hebrews 10:14
“When we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son.”
—Romans 5:10
Those are accomplished realities—not merely possibilities.

6. So this is not about removing man's responsibility​

You keep portraying my position as though I believe man is a robot with no responsibility.

That's not my position.

The regenerated sinner willingly believes.

He willingly repents.

He willingly obeys.

He willingly perseveres.

But his willingness does not originate independently of God's grace.

God gives the life.
God gives the faith.
God gives repentance.
God works the will and the doing.
The sinner willingly responds.


That does not diminish human responsibility.

It magnifies divine grace.

The real question​

So let's stop changing the subject to “fate,” “libertarian free will,” or the non-elect.

The question is about Christ's Cross.

If Christ actually:

bore the sins of His people,
obtained eternal redemption for them,
reconciled them to God by His death,
and perfected them forever by His one offering,


then how can those same people finally perish?

And if your answer is that Christ merely made salvation possible and the decisive outcome depends upon man's independently supplied faith and perseverance, then you have changed accomplished redemption into potential redemption.

I am not taking responsibility away from man.

I am giving the efficacy of salvation entirely to Christ.

Christ's death accomplishes the Legal work.
The Spirit accomplishes the Vital work.
God gives faith and repentance.
The regenerated sinner believes, repents, and obeys.
Christ brings His people to final glory.

The sinner's obedience does not make Christ's redemption succeed. Christ's redemption secures the obedience of His people.
God gives the life. God gives the faith. God gives repentance. God works the will and the doing. God gives perseverance. The sinner willingly responds. Therefore, man's obedience is real, but it is the fruit of God's saving work—not the condition that makes Christ's redemption effective.


That is not “fate beyond control.”

That is sovereign grace and an accomplished redemption.