Search results

  1. L

    The Difference between Daniel 2 and Daniel 7.

    Obedience to God and Christ can never be conflated/misidentified as obedience to the state, certainly not. However, when monarchial episcopates become standard, the flock will be lead astray. The visions disturbed Daniel so much that he had to ponder it. (Daniel 7:15) The only significant...
  2. L

    How to defend the doctrine of the Holy Trinity

    I use the KJV by habit, but I listen to the truth as spoken by people with the Holy Spirit. How does one discern the spirit? By testing against the Scripture, whether in english, french, greek or hebrew. With the Right Spirit, there is very little dissonance between what Scripture, Logic and...
  3. L

    How to defend the doctrine of the Holy Trinity

    I will assume you are talking to my post. If the spirit that guides you, says to reinterpret the Scriptures, then I recommend to you not to imbibe. If the Bible is inspired by the Holy Spirit, why do you have so much trouble accepting the plainly spoken verses.
  4. L

    How to defend the doctrine of the Holy Trinity

    Whether one is sooty or not is not the point. I stated an "fact", a truth statement if you will. If it is the truth and you are teaching to do the opposite, is it not written in the Bible that it is not good? If it is false, you should refute it. I have presented the nail to my head...
  5. L

    The Difference between Daniel 2 and Daniel 7.

    Hello Marilyn, I will let it stand for now as the logic is quite involved and requires extensive use of The Book of Revelation. The Book of Daniel is basically a done deal, and a rosetta stone to interpret Revelation.
  6. L

    How to defend the doctrine of the Holy Trinity

    Did you just called the truth a lie? Did you just teach all to ignore the Scriptures? Matt 12:32. You are quite fearless.
  7. L

    How to defend the doctrine of the Holy Trinity

    Hello justbyfaith, like I said last on that thread, we have different standards of truth. Conjectures not consistent with the Scriptures are rejected.
  8. L

    The Difference between Daniel 2 and Daniel 7.

    The roman "civilization" endured till ~1500 CE (wiki keyword search "roman empire" "Fall of Trebizond"). It spawned christendom (european monarchies) up to and past the first ideas of republicanism (magna carta, french revolution). The british remained monarchial. The french went full retard...
  9. L

    The Difference between Daniel 2 and Daniel 7.

    The statues meaning is revealed in Daniel 2:39. The golden head is babylon, silver arms is medo persia (inferred), the bronze torso is macedonia (inferred), the iron legs are rome (east and west - inferred) and the iron clay feet is america (democracy - inferred). The animals are lion -...
  10. L

    How to defend the doctrine of the Holy Trinity

    Any trinity scholar beholden to truth will state that the concept of trinity is not in the bible. So the axiom that permits trinity to be interpreted is extra biblical. That should be argument enough against trinity. Do not add to the Scriptures. Do not take away from the Scriptures...
  11. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    What you say should match what you mean. I do not see that in your doctrine. I will leave the last word for you.
  12. L

    What are you thoughts on Annihilation?

    A little thought experiment. It is written that if you think of adultery, God will consider you an adulterer. When you think of torture, how will your appear before God?
  13. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    I guess we have different metrics for truth. Have a good day!;-)
  14. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    Sorry. Typo in last response. "Father of Eternity" not "Everlasting Father" :-)
  15. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    Yeah, I know what you mean. I occasionally fall asleep at the monitor, not very restful.
  16. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    No need. My understanding of the bible is reinforced with "Everlasting Father" and is consistent with the other verses. I have tested it against Scriptures, found it to resonate, therefore I am closer to the Truth. This citation of a Trinitarian is not consistent with your interpretation of...
  17. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    Not sure what is being said here, link seems fine. Here is the salients >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isaiah 9:6—Why is Jesus called “the everlasting Father” if He is the Son of God? Problem: The orthodox Christian doctrine of the Trinity holds that God is one Essence in three...
  18. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    I will take your word that it is not modalism as I will take https://defendinginerrancy.com/bible-solutions/Isaiah_9.6.php word that it is modalism. Have no stock in this doctrine. Your math is impeccable though! Have a nice day.
  19. L

    Understanding the Trinity as a doctrine.

    Didn't you say, Isaiah 9:6 Jesus is the Everlasting Father. Sounds like modalism.