Search results

Meaning you see it as an uninteresting issue? Then why mention it?

Wow.

Are you saying that one must believe that Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday in order to get saved?

You do understand that ‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭30:19‬ ‭ is addressed to the covenant people of God and not the unbelievers and worldlings, do you?

Miss, we can bounce this back and forth for hours on end. What is unclear to you in my reply post #392? It would be totally unnatural for the regenerate person NOT to believe, NOT to surrender. So, it wouldn't happen. Negative. And I still ask what your doctrinal tradition and fellowship are?

Faith comes as a fruit of regeneration. An inevitable result or fruit of regeneration is faith and embracing the Lord. It can't be any other way around. Eh? What in my comprehension do you mean suffer? It was not me who asked you something that you had already stated, was it? (Hope...

Straw man. There be mentionings of such a word as consecration, basically with the same meaning. Anybody can read up on this and understand the principle.

No, no, no. Don't try that one. There is a difference here between the sexes in the role of services, which Paul by all certainty expounded perfectly clear on in 1Cor.14:34-40 and 1Tim.2:9-15. Again, you are arguing with Paul, not me. I didn't write this. Get that.

No, I have not said that. The new man may have his choices, as God gives him ability. But the old man cannot choose to become a new man, out of his own free will , more than a dead man can choose to become raised from the dead. The choice of that matter is solely at the hands of the one who has...

Is that all Paul is for you, a guy merely offering his personal opinions? You must have missed when we wrote (on this very issue) "the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord" (1Cor.14:37). Of course this was in compliance with the Law of God and what it says. So if you...

No. You do NOT go with the Bible, you press something into the Bible which is not there. And I wonder where you have gotten this view from and who have taught you so. Whosoever that person or these persons be, have erred. Phoebe is quiet well known to be said to have been a deaconess, and a lady...

You are making a straw man. There were numerous ordinations (although not always called ad verbatim "ordinations") throughout the Bible. None of these including women. See, if you're just going to use your own opinions or modernist philosophy to discuss this, then we ain't coming anywhere.

If you read my post carefully you would have seen that I do not agree with that. Not when it comes to unregenerate man. Read my post again. And I'll also share how George Whitefield viewed this matter:

Again: do NOT confuse, confound or MIX the old and new man with one another. The old man is at enmity with God, whilst the new man may at times struggle with his flesh but has that new nature within him that delights in the law. The dead cannot choose before they have been raised, can they...

Call it self-will if you like. The old, natural, unregenerate man has no self-will to respond to or follow God. He is at enmity with God, a child of wrath. For him the gospel is foolishness. All this is scripture, and you know that. It is only the new, regenerate, man who want to believe...

Mark.3:14 might be mentioned. Yes, record of scripture and church history up until the 1700s when the Shakers sect (or cult?) began ordaining women. And, again, you want to argue with Paul, go ahead.

You do not argue with me, but with Paul.

And, your point is? You seem to be a very confused man with problems to engage in rational conversations. *sighs* It's the second time you told me this same thing, but you have not yet replied to my questions to you on this matter. Nobody, not even you I guess, would like to continue such a...

The pattern of sacrifices was well kept and sustained by the Lord Himself. We are free to follow and obey God. Let us keep all rebellion, ignorance and usurping far from us.