Search results

What does any of that have to do with learning good and evil? Are you saying we are incapable of learning the difference?

No. His cancelled debt was the result of the grace of his master. The servant's failure to accept that grace and rest in it like Paul did (rejection of grace) meant he had no grace (power) to forgive others. Had he truly accepted the grace of the master for what it was, he would have been a...

Good and evil is something we must learn. Why do you think the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was in the garden in the first place? Such knowledge is not innate which is why the righteous are made so through faith in the word of God. Your questions are nonsensical. Have a nice day.

If he had accepted grace he would have had the power to forgive. He was like a criminal who's only sorry they get caught. 2 Corinthians 12:9 And He said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my...

Now you're sounding like someone else who was in the Garden. :rolleyes: You learn good by doing what God says. You learn evil by not doing what He says but He always ensures you know the truth of the matter before you need to decide.

Adam knew which tree and knew what it meant to eat. He had all he needed to obey.

Well who has said anyone but God saves?

Why do you constantly assume, because His humanity died on the Cross, you think we are saying He is not God? God cannot die, He is immortal.

Yes but she wasn't alive in space and time until the Lord built her body from Adam's rib. We have no idea how long Adam was in the Garden before that occurred.

How about we say Eve was naive and ignorant. She had not been around as long as Adam and didn't have as much reference material to draw on for good decision making. I don't believe she was dumb in the sense of intellectually sub par. We can all "appear" dumb if we don't have enough information. :)

It's fine but you should have explained yourself as to why you were posting what you did. Within the context of the discussion you appeared to be thinking that I considered Christ somehow "lost His Deity" during the Incarnation as the other poster did. It's all good. I assure you, I believe...

You don't say with what you disagree.

You shared scripture all pertaining to Christ's Deity without comment. What am I meant to think after someone else accused me of denying Christ's Deity? Don't make assumptions people will understand your meaning if you don't explain yourself. :)

Here is another who wants to make it look like I am saying something I'm not. Jesus is God, always has been God, always will be God. Your incapacity or unwillingness to understand one can continue to be something yet not function in that capacity is what hinders your comprehension of what I...

I have never said Jesus stopped being God. Your inability to comprehend how He can be God who is all knowing and yet lack knowledge is what you fail to explain. I'm not ignorant of the facts, I'm simply not buying your interpretation. I find it illogical. Have a nice day. :)

What makes you think you have all the understanding? As far as I am concerned you are showing little understanding of what is actually being said but rather making assumptions about what we mean. I'm not going to continue arguing with someone who can't even get what I'm saying in the first place.

Based on what you have said so far? I'm not surprised. :)

I know the process. You are not listening. On one hand you declare Peter saying He knows all, while on the other you declare that Jesus is allowed to lie because of a human process. Either, Jesus in His humanity knew the day but lied about it or He didn't know the day because His omniscient...

He never stopped being God. He stopped functioning in His own power as God.

So you think God died?