Search results

Ideally yes. But you are talking about the world's standards and ideas. Generally it is more appropriate for both husband and wife to be approximately the same age, since Adam and Eve were the same age. So when there is a discrepancy of 10-20 years one has to wonder.

That's rich, since all your posts tell us that you are wiser than God.

But it was only on the 14th of Nisan in 30 AD that God brought the New Covenant into existence. Which means that while God is always the same, His covenants are not always the same. It is God who found fault with the Old Covenant, and therefore provided A BETTER COVENANT. You still do not...

In the KJV it says "the saints", and that refers to the OT saints. At the same time when God gives us a limited revelation, then we should not speculate. This was a limited resurrection, but prophecy speaks about the resurrection of the saints also, and the NT speaks about the resurrection of...

It was not Peter who was confused, but you certainly appear to be confused. Very confused. What makes you think Peter was excluded from the Body of Christ and that he was confused, when Peter was given the Keys of the Kingdom by Christ Himself, and also called a rock (Cephas or Kepha)? Peter...

Well if you don't care about the Greek you have already shot yourself in the foot. And we do know for sure, since the traditional Hebrew and Greek texts are supported by 99% of the existing manuscripts.

Don't call me a liar by showing us footnotes. Footnotes in modern bibles tell the reader that those words DO NOT BELONG IN THE BIBLE, by casting doubt on the text. And who will be bothered with footnotes when the NIV claims to be based on *the best" manuscripts (another lie)? But you have...

Take some time to carefully compare (1) the Received Text, (2) the KJV, and (3) the NIV. It is AN INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT that the NIV has presented us with a corrupt Bible. https://www.kingjamesvideoministries.com/NIVOmissions.pdf The Lord's Prayer is a good example of the SERIOUS mutilation of...

The "unknown" does not belong in the text and that is why I quoted the actual Greek text. And the word glossa can literally mean a human tongue, but in this context it means a language. Strong's Concordance (1100) glóssa: the tongue, a language Original Word: γλῶσσα, ης, ἡ Part of Speech: Noun...

EXACTLY. That is the point that seems to be irrelevant to those who promote modern Bible versions. The goal of the King James translators was to translate word for word what they found in the Hebrew and Greek (as much as it was possible). When that would not have provided an idiomatic...

This title shows a lack of understanding. When eternity replaces time, then God's eternal Sabbath becomes the eternal rest of the saints in Christ. HEBREWS 4: THE ETERNAL REST OF GOD 1 Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into His [GOD'S] rest, any of you should...

The Mormon *Melchizedek Priesthood* is a Mormon invention based upon *revelations* to Joseph Smith. However it has no basis in the Bible. Only the Lord Jesus Christ is the High Priest in Heaven after the order of Melchizedek. See Hebrews 7 and 8.

You would have to ask Joshua. Chances are that there was some genetic defect in a group of people living in a specific region, possibly caused by some chemical imbalance.

Changing (updating) the typeface or the spellings does not constitute "revision". Revision means omissions, additions, deletions, substitutions, and transpositions. Based upon a different critical text.

That's correct. The Greek equivalents are slightly modified. Elias for Elijah is another good example.

Someone has a serious beef with Peter. Probably does not want to meet him at the Pearly Gates (as commonly believed, but completely incorrect).

Where do you come up with these strange ideas? Christ's ministry to Israel was for approximately 3 1/2 years, which accommodates this parable. But this has nothing to do with CHRISTIAN BAPTISM. And John's baptism was at the beginning of Christ's ministry. Shortly thereafter John was beheaded...

That was John's baptism (not identical with Christian baptism). Christian baptism is for the whole world AFTER they believe on Christ.

Scofield did not invent the Gap Theory but his Reference Bible did promote. To be perfectly fair to him, his Reference Bible is GENERALLY sound, and Dispensationalism is also sound (as opposed to Hyper-Dispensationalism). A 17th century Dutch theologian -- Simon Episcopius -- is credited with...

I would suggest that God admonishes us to NOT BE ignorant. Therefore Paul says over and over again "I would NOT have you to be ignorant, brethren..." Today there is no excuse for anyone to be ignorant about what is revealed in Scripture. The Bible is freely available to all on the Internet...