Search results

I remember him as such. Maybe I just pressed the wrong buttons at the wrong time and got the Baby Ruth instead of the Nestle's Crunch that I was after, Lol. God bless, - V

With that, I believe I'll head off to work, Lol. Thanks for the chuckles. :)

Ok, then give me MY exegesis of 1 Peter 1:17-22, since you're apparently not going to be giving me yours anytime soon, Lol. (Note to self: Biblical discussions with CV5 may unfortunately be an utter and complete waste of time, Lol)

Too much of this around here. In two days I've seen no less than three people use this approach. "Case closed. End of argument. You can't respond anymore because I won. Now go wallow in your corner," LoL. Very difficult to argue with such a powerful, well-reasoned out rebuttal. :)

You don't even know what my "pretentions" are, LoL. Man, this place is about as Wild West as the nightmare I fled from. Is there any way to throw a white flag, and maybe start this thread over? Lol.

LoL. Nothing like a little chutzpah, I always say... Btw, I actually agree with him about soul sleep, but I would never argue so vehemently with such a pretty face. Especially one that was so... purple. I'm sorry. Magenta, Lol..

Oucheth. I would refer to that as a low blow, Lol. Hello, sister. Trying to make my way back around to this forum again. Nice to see some of the old faces. As I remember it, CV5 was someone I was generally in agreement with on Charismatic issues, only we seem to be getting nowhere on this one...

You didn't provide an exegesis, which means you can kinda skirt around flaws in your interpretation being proven out. But I never get one, so it is what it is. I will deal with your statements on individual verses instead. About the above, is it not a fallacy to think that only angels can sin...

Car wreck?

You must have been pretty young. What were you dying of, if I may ask?

https://christianforums.net I go by a different name there, as my usual tag name was already taken here by someone when I first joined. But if you become a member over there under Elijah, I'll be able to send you a conversation and share my own Baptism with you then. God bless, and hope to...

We're not only close on theology, we appear to be almost identical, which I don't believe I've ever seen before. So you know, I have another forum I'm active at where there is no charge for starting private conversations. I may become a fully paid member here as well, but in the meantime I...

CV5, what I'm asking for is an exegesis; a breakdown verse-by-verse of the entire passage, defining how you interpret every word in every phrase. It's rarely something I get, however, so maybe I shouldn't even be asking, but in order to evaluate whether an interpretation holds water or not, the...

I think he has absolutely no ears to hear what the Spirit is saying to the churches, but it wouldn't be the first I've ever encountered it before.

Greetings, Dirtman. If you could, give me a breakdown of the full passage. I've been trying to get CV5 to provide me one because proper interpretation of the passage is the crux of the question at hand in this thread. 17 It is better, if it is the will of God, to suffer for doing good than for...

Yes, so far I think we're in full agreement actually. I'd send you a conversation, only I'm just checking back with this forum for the first time in more than a year or so I think, and haven't yet decided if I want to become a paid member or not (you have to have a paid membership to start...

I was quoting Nehemiah 6, who was trying to tell me I need to make sure I don't think for myself, case closed, Lol. It wasn't directed at you. My apologies if I did anything to make you think it was.

It means your mind is closed, Lol. Ok, I can see where this is going. Talk to you later then. Peace, - H

Then you do not believe that tongues of Fire came to rest upon the disciple's heads on the Day of Pentecost? That is what the phrase "the Holy Ghost and Fire" is referring to. The way you are interpreting it is an extremely unnatural reading in the original. Nowhere in scripture will you find...

I'm aware of all that, Nehemiah, as I study the languages. But even your Strong's reference cites "In" as its primary definition, because that's what the word literally means in strict translation. If you assume, after openly admitting that the word can be translated in several different ways...