1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You are entitled to speak freely for your opinion.
I know that .
However,when lies continually fostered here by adversaries have been proven as such,that's not an opinion.

Those are facts in evidence.

If you don't know the difference between an opinion and a true fact,you're out of your depth.
 
True.

No,he never did.
Please don't allow yourself to follow the adversaries of the truth here,and start throwing out suppositions bout Charlie.

Charlies record is public.
Who he was is a matter of record. And that fact shuts down those who are intent on slandering his identity and legacy.

That's you. That has no relevance to Charlie Kirk.

Off topic,Red Herring.
Charlie Kirk never proposed such a thing.
Your input has been heard.
 
Basically they want to shut you up, so they throw a name at you.
How unbiblical is that?
Basically,that one whom you defend repeatedly ignores facts that refute lies they perpetuate against Charlie Kirk,Erika,Charlies assassination,and Robinson.

You betcha there's a name for that.
One time a woman called me a racist against her, and she and I from same origin. Because I told her to stop stealing :) 😃
Irrelevant to this topic.
 
How unbiblical is that?
Basically,that one whom you defend repeatedly ignores facts that refute lies they perpetuate against Charlie Kirk,Erika,Charlies assassination,and Robinson.

You betcha there's a name for that.

Irrelevant to this topic.
We have different opinions.
If you don't allow other opinions 🤷

Ciao...
 
Can people just have civil debate without calling names?
The names to avoid:

Anti this
Anti that
....
Yes,avoid identifying the bigotry ,the Sin, so it is enabled because we are suppose to feel ashamed for calling it out.

Candace Owens gave herself the title of Antisemitic.

One would have to watch her behaviors on the podcast she now has online. Because she was fired from other media organizations due to her conduct.
 
What i meant is you, Bible- locket,you are entitled to speak for yourself.
We all speak for ourselves here. That's a given.

When someone defends reprobate behavior,those who continually promote debunked lies as truth,that's immoral and contrary to the very spirit of our faith. And of course, it is repeated willful Sin.

Righteous judgement against that fallen behavior is warranted.

Defending that reprobate personality dedicated to repeated willful Sin , using the claim it is an opinion as we are all entitled to, is deplorable.And yet another falsehood.

Theres a difference between opinion and true fact.
When someone is of the opinion perpetrators of falsehood are entitled to continue,despite the factual truth that refutes their falsehood,that someone is as lost as that deciever.
 
It need be noted here I think.
Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Leaving his widows and babies to grieve unimaginable loss.

That is compounded by Internet Trolls on YouTube and elsewhere.

They invent a miasma of falseity in order to give Tyler Robinson a way out of the evil he chose to perpetrate in broad daylight. Cold blooded premeditated first degree murder.

To which he confessed multiple times to his gay Trans lover and his own father.

When facts are denied,when they're also on the court record in evidence,and falsehoods and outlandish fictions are heralded as worthy of being considered as truth,it is actually a blessing.

Because it is rare to witness multiple examples of what is warned of and against in 1 John 2.

Antichrist's are in the world today. We know this.
 
It need be noted here I think.
Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Leaving his widows and babies to grieve unimaginable loss.

That is compounded by Internet Trolls on YouTube and elsewhere.

They invent a miasma of falseity in order to give Tyler Robinson a way out of the evil he chose to perpetrate in broad daylight. Cold blooded premeditated first degree murder.

To which he confessed multiple times to his gay Trans lover and his own father.

When facts are denied,when they're also on the court record in evidence,and falsehoods and outlandish fictions are heralded as worthy of being considered as truth,it is actually a blessing.

Because it is rare to witness multiple examples of what is warned of and against in 1 John 2.

Antichrist's are in the world today. We know this.
Why would anyone be trying to get some guy off? The people who care about Charlie Kirk's assassination want to find out who was responsible and if that includes Tyler Robinson they want him convicted. But they want all the questions answered. There is no reason why anyone who wants to get the killer/or killers convicted would not want every question answered.
 
I taught Forensics and the one thing you learn is that every contact leaves a trace. It is not possible for someone to assassinate Charlie Kirk without leaving a trace. And you also learn the only way to keep a secret is if you are the only one that knows it. So if there were more people involved than just one person the evidence will lead you to people who will confess.
 
Did you hear the preliminary hearing in which Tyler Robinson's partner was questioned?

1. Did you talk about politics? No, not really.

2. Did you talk about LGBTQ rights? No, not really.

3. Did he ever talk to you about Charlie Kirk? I never heard him mention Charlie Kirk.
 
Did you hear the preliminary hearing in which Tyler Robinson's partner was questioned?

1. Did you talk about politics? No, not really.

2. Did you talk about LGBTQ rights? No, not really.

3. Did he ever talk to you about Charlie Kirk? I never heard him mention Charlie Kirk.
Surprisingly they didn't give him a script.
 
Why would anyone be trying to get some guy off? The people who care about Charlie Kirk's assassination want to find out who was responsible and if that includes Tyler Robinson they want him convicted. But they want all the questions answered. There is no reason why anyone who wants to get the killer/or killers convicted would not want every question answered.
We are not allowed to think, to analyze, to investigate.
Whatever they tell you to believe, just believe it. Do not question, otherwise they will yell all kinds of name at you.

Throughout scripture, we have seen many history repeating.

Nothing new under the sun.
 
We are not allowed to think, to analyze, to investigate.
Whatever they tell you to believe, just believe it. Do not question, otherwise they will yell all kinds of name at you.

Throughout scripture, we have seen many history repeating.

Nothing new under the sun.
But why would people who want to get the killer, who want justice, not allow others to think, to analyze, to investigate?

They had figured out who did this in a week, way before any of us had even seen any evidence. So they should understand we are a little slower, just answer our questions. Everyone who is studying this will learn from this. The cat is in the cradle, they'll learn and one day they are going to be "just like You". And then they too will know who to pin future assassinations on before anyone has had a chance to look at the evidence.
 
To say that you cannot remove evidence from a crime scene is not a theory, it is the law. The person involved has been videotaped removing evidence from a crime scene and has admitted as much. That is not a theory.

To say that the prosecutor and defense attorney have the right to unaltered and unedited evidence is not a theory, that is the law. The three minute video they were given was edited and altered from the 26 minute video. They have the right to see the 26 minute video. Not a theory, that is the law.

To say that the person who took this evidence from the crime scene might be guilty of obstructing justice is not a theory, it is the law. I use the word "might" in the same way as we say you are innocent until proven guilty. He should have his day in court. But the evidence that is a predicate for a prosecution is already available. That is not a theory, everyone agrees with the evidence being there, some may argue that it isn't a felony, fine, they should be witnesses for the defense.
Funny how there were no complaints that it was in the news channel until the government and TPUSA lies were exposed. Now it is on public record that Teryl Farnsworth lied and disturbed the crime scene, suddenly the thread belongs in the conspiracy can? Liars don't like when lies are exposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
When calling that out, please together with hard fact, side by side, just to avoid confusion.

Thank you very much.

Jesus called out the jew leaders as children of devil. Should we say Jesus is ......?
Paul already answered for us. "Let God be true and every man a liar." Such people are liars, and we know who the Father of Lies is.
 
Another one on ignore. I don't have time to waste on those who can't differentiate between antisemitism and calling out liars. Lying has nothing to do with race or religion, and those who would use race or religion to enable liars are liars themselves.
 
We are not allowed to think, to analyze, to investigate.
Whatever they tell you to believe, just believe it. Do not question, otherwise they will yell all kinds of name at you.

Throughout scripture, we have seen many history repeating.

Nothing new under the sun.
It's sickening that the assassination of a husband and father means nothing to you.

You align with someone who publishes lies Owens invents,while denigrating proof on the record.

If people believe those lies,the slander and defamation Owens and that one here constantly credit,while disparaging truth, they're going to think Ro inson is a patsy.

Those here who slander and defame Charlie,his widow Erika,and TPUSA,and have zero respect or consideration for grieving babies,are a shame before the eyes of God.

They lie about the SD cards in the cameras around the dias where Charlie was assassinated. It doesn't matter those SD cards were given to the FBI. After they were taken from the cameras so no one else would think to grab them for nefarious reasons.

It doesn't matter to them that Robinson confessed repeatedly. In person and in text.

Or,that he's on video stiff leg walking as if hiding a long gun in his pant leg.

If someone here has a rifle try that. You'd have to have lose pants,but you can put a rifle down your pantleg and walk. You can hold it with your hand in the pants pocket on that same side. Just cut the pocket apart, it's in your pants,no one sees that,and your hand can hold that rifle firmly as you walk.

An assassin committed murder.
He assassinated a Christian,an activist,a father,husband.

And disparage the facts in evidence and defend proven lies.

In this thread, Charlie had enemies still. Because the facts of his murder are suppose to be overcome by the lies of Candace Owens.

And just for the record. Not for a minute does a purveyor of Owens slander and defamation stand a chance of being believed when they claim they taught Forensics.

They defend Sins. Denegrate truth.

Please!