Being addressed in the other thread. Let's deal with it there.
What other thread?
Being addressed in the other thread. Let's deal with it there.
Linked here:What other thread?
Let us benefit from the hard work of VCO'S study, and heed the wisdom that come from the experience of others that can sound like horror storiesWhen she began to speak in her “tongues” so-called gift, the man started yelling, “Lady stop! You do not know what you are saying! Lady stop!”
Let us benefit from the hard work of VCO'S study, and heed the wisdom that come from the experience of others that can sound like horror stories
Let's not cause anyone to puke or vomit
The lesson is this: If you don't know what you are doing, don't do it. God rather wisdom over ignorance
So what human devised software would be needed to translate God given spiritual languages?That could potentially prove the if it was a language or not. And if the Translator could be test whether or not the Transtator can translate the foreign language, or NOT.
What's wrong with the bible lying in your lap? All the mysteries of God are made plain in His word.So what human devised software would be needed to translate God given spiritual languages?
Might be a bit beyond your Webster's.
That electronic devise I meaning earlier has potential:
That device newesr Langogo device has currently 92 different languages.
That could potentially prove the if it was a language or not. And if the Translator could be test whether or not the Transtator can translate the foreign language, or NOT.
The majority of languages that ‘tongues’ purportedly come out as are fairly obscure; it’s rarely a mainstream language like German, French, etc.
Trying to use a machine translator would not really work as likely it would not detect any particular language.
I have transcribed several examples of tongues-speech and tried using a few machine translators (i.e. Google Translate). Many times, it will pick up on a word or two that just happens to mean something in some language and it assumes the entire paragraph is in that language – needless to say, the ‘translation’ doesn’t quite work and makes little sense.
Modern tongues-speech is non-cognitive non-language utterance; however, even if you start uttering strings of syllables, one or two of those strings (what are perceived by tongues-speakers as ‘words’) is bound to mean something in some language somewhere. There are just too many languages and variables for that not to happen. In fact, you don’t even have to speak in tongues for that to happen. If you just utter a bunch of nonsensical ‘words’; a few of those may actually mean something in some language.
I would question the non-cognitive, unless one means there is "automaticity" as reported in one study.
Similar to babbling; however, babbling does not attempt to produce something that resembles language. Tongues does.
Interesting, now I see babbling as in a baby the process whereby they practice speech sounds and is communicative on a basic level, yet they have not yet developed a full understanding of language and communication but if all things are typically developing they will get there.
This is where I see "tongues" fails since adults do know what communication is yet they side step that knowledge and insist that babbling is communicative??
So what human devised software would be needed to translate God given spiritual languages?
Might be a bit beyond your Webster's.
Non-cognitive in the sense that one is not consciously making an effort to produce it. Also, that there are no cognitive processes involved in the sense that there are cognitive processes involved in producing real language.
So, yes, in a broad sense, it's automatically produced with no apparent cognitive effort. Similar to babbling; however, babbling does not attempt to produce something that resembles language. Tongues does.
Interesting, now I see babbling as in a baby the process whereby they practice speech sounds and is communicative on a basic level, yet they have not yet developed a full understanding of language and communication but if all things are typically developing they will get there.
This is where I see "tongues" fails since adults do know what communication is yet they side step that knowledge and insist that babbling is communicative??
I had no intention to debate this subject. Now the LORD has put it on my heart, to ONCE AGAIN, debate those who have been deceived. He will tell me when the time comes to STOP. See my above two posts.
CORRECT, you got it right. And a little more than that, because I believe the LORD knew what was coming, and HE specifically mention BATTALOGEO in the Greek, because of the CONFUSION in Corinth and today.
Matthew 6:5-10 (NIV)
5 "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full.
6 But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
7 And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words.
8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
9 "This, then, is how you should pray: "'Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name,
10 your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
THAT IS A MODEL FOR ALL PRAYER, and How we are to form it, in our own native LANGUAGE.
The majority of languages that ‘tongues’ purportedly come out as are fairly obscure; it’s rarely a mainstream language like German, French, etc.
Trying to use a machine translator would not really work as likely it would not detect any particular language.
I have transcribed several examples of tongues-speech and tried using a few machine translators (i.e. Google Translate). Many times, it will pick up on a word or two that just happens to mean something in some language and it assumes the entire paragraph is in that language – needless to say, the ‘translation’ doesn’t quite work and makes little sense.
Modern tongues-speech is non-cognitive non-language utterance; however, even if you start uttering strings of syllables, one or two of those strings (what are perceived by tongues-speakers as ‘words’) is bound to mean something in some language somewhere. There are just too many languages and variables for that not to happen. In fact, you don’t even have to speak in tongues for that to happen. If you just utter a bunch of nonsensical ‘words’; a few of those may actually mean something in some language.
I explained several times on this thread that we requested you post the information to share what your research.![]()