I've been out of this thread for a long time and am only stopping by but that's pretty amazing that Pope Francis says a person can be an atheist who rejects Jesus Christ and simply follows their own conscience and are guaranteed a place in heaven.
What if they are a Muslim who rejects Jesus Christ and is murdering Christians who refuse to convert to Islam because their conscience tells them to as is occurring in the Middle East right now. Or a pagan homosexual engaging in wild homosexual acts with many people while leading people into the bondage of the occult because their conscience tells them they were "born that way" and are deceived about the occult. Etc... etc... etc...
This is why we hold to sola scripture and not Catholic doctrine when it comes into opposition to scripture.
As for the Catholic doctrine of Papal infallibility, I will say that you need to study it further because you mistakenly believe that the Catholic doctrine of Papal infallibility applies to whatever the Pope says but it does not.
The infallible teachings of the Pope must be based on, or at least not contradict, Sacred Tradition or Sacred Scripture. There are conditions that must be met before a Pope's statement can be declared infallible. According to the teaching of the
First Vatican Council and Catholic tradition, the conditions required for
ex cathedra papal teaching are as follows:
- "the Roman Pontiff"
- "speaks ex cathedra" ("that is, when in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority"....)
- "he defines"
- "that a doctrine concerning faith or morals"
- "must be held by the whole Church" (Pastor Aeternus, chap. 4)
For a teaching by a pope or ecumenical council to be recognized as infallible, the teaching must be a decision of the supreme teaching authority of the Church (pope or
College of Bishops); it must concern a doctrine of faith or morals; it must bind the universal Church; and it must be proposed as something to be held firmly and immutably.
The terminology of a definitive decree will usually make clear that this last condition is fulfilled, as through a formula such as "By the authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by Our own authority, We declare, pronounce and define the doctrine . . . to be revealed by God and as such to be firmly and immutably held by all the faithful", or through an accompanying
anathema stating that anyone who deliberately
dissents is outside the Catholic Church.
In July 2005 Pope Benedict XVI stated during an impromptu address to priests in
Aosta that: "The Pope is not an oracle; he is infallible in very rare situations, as we know". His predecessor Pope John XXIII once remarked: "I am only infallible if I speak infallibly but I shall never do that, so I am not infallible".
A doctrine proposed by a pope as his own opinion, not solemnly proclaimed as a doctrine of the Church, may be rejected as false, even if it is on a matter of faith and morals, and even more any view he expresses on other matters.
A well-known example of a personal opinion on a matter of faith and morals that was taught by a pope but rejected by the Church is the view that Pope John XXII expressed on when the dead can reach the beatific vision.
This doctrine of Pope Francis obviously conflicts with the Bible and is not infallible even by the liberal Roman Catholic definition.
But just the fact that he said it is very disturbing. One would think a Pope would have studied the New Testament. WOW!
I don’t know why Roman Catholics are so concerned aboutwhether they might or might not be Christians: the latest news from their newpope is that even atheists will go to heaven!
Pope says atheistswill go to heaven:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/the-pope/10302850/Pope-Francis-reaches-out-to-atheists-and-agnostics.html
So why do Roman Catholics even worry about whether or not theyare Christians? Their pope says thateven atheists can go to heaven, and we can be sure that’s true, because, as theCatholics have always declared: when their pope speaks, “Ex cathedra,” he’s infallible, and speaks in the Name of Jesus,with Jesus’ perfection!
But I’m confused; Catholics have always said (‘ex cathedra’) that, “Extra ecclesiam nulla salus,” or, “There’s no salvation outside of RomanCatholicism!” They’ve always toldthe Protestants that Protestants must become Roman Catholics to go to heaven;does this mean, then, that you can go to heaven if you’re an atheist, but youcan’t go to heaven if you’re a Protestant? I guess that being a Protestant is even worse than being anatheist! Wow! Jesus-On-Earth is really coming up with somenew doctrines… or is it that he’s only revealing to us now, some secretdoctrines that Jesus-In-Heaven has always said?
Roman Catholics have always said that their pope is, “The Vicar (Replacement) of Christ,”Jesus’ infallible representative on earth! But Hebrews 13:8 says, “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and for ever.!” If so, why are,“Christ’s,” words changing with the times, and each new pope who comesalong? And why did Jesus die, if Hedidn’t have to … since even an atheist can get to heaven, if he’s just sincerein his unbelief? So Jesus died in vain??
(The REAL)Jesus said to us,
“16 For God so loved theworld, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him shouldnot perish, but have everlasting life. 17 ForGod sent not His Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the worldthrough Him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: buthe that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in thename of the only begotten Son of God.” – John 3:16-18