ChatGPT is an Open Source AI
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
ChatGPT
You said:
Write a speech in the style of Donald Trump about how stale potato chips are America's most pressing concern
ChatGPT said:
"The Great Potato Chip Crisis"
Ladies and gentlemen, great Americans, thank you for being here today. You’re incredible people. Truly incredible. Now, I’m going to talk about something very important. Some might say it’s the most important issue we face as a nation today. Are you ready? It’s a problem that’s been ignored for far too long. A tragedy. And it’s affecting millions of hardworking Americans. I’m talking about stale potato chips. Yes, stale chips, folks. A total disaster.
You buy a bag. You’re excited—who isn’t? It’s chips! You open it up, expecting that amazing crunch, that perfect salty goodness, and what do you get? Limp. Soft. Sadness in a bag. It’s unacceptable, folks. And the American people deserve better.
We’re the greatest country in the world. We invented potato chips—well, someone did. Probably a genius. And now we’re letting our chips go stale? I don’t think so. Not under my watch.
We’re going to hold the chip companies accountable. They think they can get away with this because nobody’s talking about it. Well, I’m talking about it now. We’re going to get better packaging, folks. Sealed tighter than a submarine. No more half-filled bags, either. You open a bag, it’s going to be full. Believe me, it’s going to be tremendous.
And let me tell you, stale chips don’t just affect taste. Oh no, it’s deeper than that. It affects morale, productivity—it’s why the country feels off sometimes. You can’t build a winning team on soggy chips, folks. We need strength, crunch, freshness.
So here’s what we’re going to do: we’re launching Operation Crunch Time. It’s going to be the biggest, boldest initiative in snack history. We’ll make chips great again. We’ll work with the best people—the best. Scientists, packaging experts, snack lovers. Together, we’re going to bring back the golden age of chips.
And when we’re done, you’ll be able to open a bag of chips in Alaska or Florida, California or Texas, and every single one will be crispy perfection. People will say, "How did this happen? Who made chips so amazing?" And the answer will be simple: the American people, led by me, of course.
So let’s do it. Let’s crunch together. God bless you, and God bless the United States of America, the snack capital of the world.
Thank you!
You said:
Write a speech in the style of Donald Trump about how stale potato chips are America's most pressing concern
ChatGPT said:
"The Great Potato Chip Crisis"
Ladies and gentlemen, great Americans, thank you for being here today. You’re incredible people. Truly incredible. Now, I’m going to talk about something very important. Some might say it’s the most important issue we face as a nation today. Are you ready? It’s a problem that’s been ignored for far too long. A tragedy. And it’s affecting millions of hardworking Americans. I’m talking about stale potato chips. Yes, stale chips, folks. A total disaster.
You buy a bag. You’re excited—who isn’t? It’s chips! You open it up, expecting that amazing crunch, that perfect salty goodness, and what do you get? Limp. Soft. Sadness in a bag. It’s unacceptable, folks. And the American people deserve better.
We’re the greatest country in the world. We invented potato chips—well, someone did. Probably a genius. And now we’re letting our chips go stale? I don’t think so. Not under my watch.
We’re going to hold the chip companies accountable. They think they can get away with this because nobody’s talking about it. Well, I’m talking about it now. We’re going to get better packaging, folks. Sealed tighter than a submarine. No more half-filled bags, either. You open a bag, it’s going to be full. Believe me, it’s going to be tremendous.
And let me tell you, stale chips don’t just affect taste. Oh no, it’s deeper than that. It affects morale, productivity—it’s why the country feels off sometimes. You can’t build a winning team on soggy chips, folks. We need strength, crunch, freshness.
So here’s what we’re going to do: we’re launching Operation Crunch Time. It’s going to be the biggest, boldest initiative in snack history. We’ll make chips great again. We’ll work with the best people—the best. Scientists, packaging experts, snack lovers. Together, we’re going to bring back the golden age of chips.
And when we’re done, you’ll be able to open a bag of chips in Alaska or Florida, California or Texas, and every single one will be crispy perfection. People will say, "How did this happen? Who made chips so amazing?" And the answer will be simple: the American people, led by me, of course.
So let’s do it. Let’s crunch together. God bless you, and God bless the United States of America, the snack capital of the world.
Thank you!
I assume you are trying to demonstrate that even AI is funnier than SNL and the leftist comedians. Good job.
I suppose another conclusion could be that Trump will make comedy funny again. Fair enough.
Nice to see in these quiet moments prior to complete nuclear annihilation that you have a sense of humor, kudos to you.
I suppose another conclusion could be that Trump will make comedy funny again. Fair enough.
Nice to see in these quiet moments prior to complete nuclear annihilation that you have a sense of humor, kudos to you.
Jordan Peterson and Eric Cartman are debating about Pop-Tarts
Peterson argues that unprosted Pop-Tarts lack the additional sweetness the frosting has to offer, but they make up for it with their charming simplicity and we should appreciate the cultural value
Cartman argues that anything other than unprosted Pop-Tarts is absolutely unacceptable
[Scene: A cozy, nondescript kitchen with a table where Jordan Peterson and Eric Cartman are sitting across from each other, a package of Pop-Tarts in the center. A heated debate has just begun.]
Jordan Peterson: [Leaning forward, speaking with calm conviction] You see, Cartman, the thing about Pop-Tarts is that there's a level of nuance to them. The frosted ones, sure, they have that extra sweetness, that immediate burst of sugary pleasure. But I’d argue that the unfrosted Pop-Tart, though seemingly plain, embodies a certain simplicity. It offers a kind of clarity. It’s not overwhelmed by excessive sweetness—it has the flavor of the filling, and there’s something culturally valuable in that. We should appreciate that simplicity, that restraint. It’s a product of minimalism, a representation of the utilitarian side of breakfast foods.
Eric Cartman: [Grabbing an unfrosted Pop-Tart from the package, holding it up like it's some kind of sacred object, scowling at Peterson] You’re insane, man. Frosted Pop-Tarts are the only real Pop-Tarts! Anything else is just a sad, pathetic excuse for breakfast. Unfrosted? What’s the point of that? You’re just eating dry cardboard with a little bit of weird fruit filling inside. It’s nothing without the frosting! That’s what makes them good! The frosting is what gives you the energy, the power, the pure joy! Without the frosting, it’s like... it's like they’re incomplete, broken! You can’t even call them Pop-Tarts if they’re unfrosted!
Jordan Peterson: [Chuckling softly, adjusting his glasses] I understand where you're coming from, Cartman, but I think you’re missing the broader picture here. The frosting, yes, it provides an additional layer of sweetness and decadence. But the unfrosted version... it teaches us something important about balance. It’s not about excess. It’s a reminder that not everything needs to be sweetened to the point of excess. You see, the unfrosted Pop-Tart doesn’t demand your attention with sugar. It’s a more restrained, almost humble offering. It lets the filling speak for itself. It’s simplicity in the face of consumer excess. In a way, it challenges us to appreciate the intrinsic qualities of the food itself, not just the packaging or the sugar coating.
Eric Cartman: [Interrupting, voice rising in disbelief] No, no, no, NO! The frosting is what makes it special! You can’t just sit there and tell me that eating an unfrosted Pop-Tart is somehow a noble, cultured experience. That’s ridiculous! Frosted Pop-Tarts are everything! They’re like, the pinnacle of breakfast innovation! They’re a perfect balance of sweet and crunchy. They’re like, a little piece of heaven in your mouth. The frosting is the whole point of Pop-Tarts! You take that away, and what are you left with? Nothing. It’s like you’re eating a soggy piece of... I don’t even know, like, wallpaper! Frosted Pop-Tarts are essential to the experience!
Jordan Peterson: [Nodding thoughtfully, raising his hand as if to make a careful point] I think you’re overlooking something here, Cartman. The frosting, yes, it does provide that instant gratification we all crave. It’s a shortcut to pleasure. But in the long run, our tendency to seek out the immediate reward—the sugar rush, the frosting—is, in some ways, the epitome of modern consumerism. It's the tendency to choose instant pleasure over the appreciation of something that might take a little more effort to enjoy. The unfrosted Pop-Tart... it doesn’t promise you an easy escape. It requires a more thoughtful approach. It’s simpler, yes, but that’s the beauty of it. It makes you think. You don't need the frosting to feel whole. It’s about developing an appreciation for what’s there, not just what’s added.
Eric Cartman: [Shaking his head, now seriously frustrated, holding up an unfrosted Pop-Tart like it's a criminal evidence] Are you seriously lecturing me about appreciating what’s inside? Who cares about what’s inside if it tastes like garbage? Look, I get it, okay? You’re trying to make a point, but frosting is like... like the whole reason Pop-Tarts exist! It’s the perfect combination of sweet, crunchy, and gooey! You can’t just strip that away and pretend like it’s still the same thing. What you’re talking about—this “appreciating the simplicity” thing—sounds like some sort of lame, self-righteous philosophy that’s totally wrong! I’ll say it again—anything other than frosted Pop-Tarts is absolutely unacceptable.
Jordan Peterson: [Pausing, then smiling slightly, amused at Cartman’s passionate reaction] You’re a man of strong convictions, I’ll give you that, Cartman. But, there’s a deeper truth here. The unfrosted Pop-Tart forces us to confront the idea of moderation—to recognize that not everything needs to be extravagant to have value. Yes, the frosting gives immediate satisfaction, but it’s the unfrosted Pop-Tart that can teach us something about delayed gratification and restraint. It’s not about depriving yourself of pleasure; it’s about understanding that sometimes, the simpler things are just as valuable.
Eric Cartman: [Crossing his arms, huffing, still holding the unfrosted Pop-Tart as if it's a weapon] Whatever, man. You can keep your plain, boring Pop-Tarts. I’m sticking with the good ones. Frosted forever! [He takes a dramatic bite of his unfrosted Pop-Tart, grimaces, and then immediately pulls out a frosted one from his bag, taking a much more satisfied bite.]
Jordan Peterson: [Chuckling softly, shaking his head, still calm] There it is. You’ve made your choice, Cartman. But one day, you might come to appreciate the simple things. Perhaps... just perhaps, you’ll see the value in the unfrosted ones.
Eric Cartman: [Through a mouthful of frosting, smugly] Nope. Frosted all the way, buddy. [Waves him off dismissively]
[Scene fades as Peterson and Cartman continue their food battle, each firmly entrenched in their Pop-Tart philosophy.]
End scene.
Peterson argues that unprosted Pop-Tarts lack the additional sweetness the frosting has to offer, but they make up for it with their charming simplicity and we should appreciate the cultural value
Cartman argues that anything other than unprosted Pop-Tarts is absolutely unacceptable
[Scene: A cozy, nondescript kitchen with a table where Jordan Peterson and Eric Cartman are sitting across from each other, a package of Pop-Tarts in the center. A heated debate has just begun.]
Jordan Peterson: [Leaning forward, speaking with calm conviction] You see, Cartman, the thing about Pop-Tarts is that there's a level of nuance to them. The frosted ones, sure, they have that extra sweetness, that immediate burst of sugary pleasure. But I’d argue that the unfrosted Pop-Tart, though seemingly plain, embodies a certain simplicity. It offers a kind of clarity. It’s not overwhelmed by excessive sweetness—it has the flavor of the filling, and there’s something culturally valuable in that. We should appreciate that simplicity, that restraint. It’s a product of minimalism, a representation of the utilitarian side of breakfast foods.
Eric Cartman: [Grabbing an unfrosted Pop-Tart from the package, holding it up like it's some kind of sacred object, scowling at Peterson] You’re insane, man. Frosted Pop-Tarts are the only real Pop-Tarts! Anything else is just a sad, pathetic excuse for breakfast. Unfrosted? What’s the point of that? You’re just eating dry cardboard with a little bit of weird fruit filling inside. It’s nothing without the frosting! That’s what makes them good! The frosting is what gives you the energy, the power, the pure joy! Without the frosting, it’s like... it's like they’re incomplete, broken! You can’t even call them Pop-Tarts if they’re unfrosted!
Jordan Peterson: [Chuckling softly, adjusting his glasses] I understand where you're coming from, Cartman, but I think you’re missing the broader picture here. The frosting, yes, it provides an additional layer of sweetness and decadence. But the unfrosted version... it teaches us something important about balance. It’s not about excess. It’s a reminder that not everything needs to be sweetened to the point of excess. You see, the unfrosted Pop-Tart doesn’t demand your attention with sugar. It’s a more restrained, almost humble offering. It lets the filling speak for itself. It’s simplicity in the face of consumer excess. In a way, it challenges us to appreciate the intrinsic qualities of the food itself, not just the packaging or the sugar coating.
Eric Cartman: [Interrupting, voice rising in disbelief] No, no, no, NO! The frosting is what makes it special! You can’t just sit there and tell me that eating an unfrosted Pop-Tart is somehow a noble, cultured experience. That’s ridiculous! Frosted Pop-Tarts are everything! They’re like, the pinnacle of breakfast innovation! They’re a perfect balance of sweet and crunchy. They’re like, a little piece of heaven in your mouth. The frosting is the whole point of Pop-Tarts! You take that away, and what are you left with? Nothing. It’s like you’re eating a soggy piece of... I don’t even know, like, wallpaper! Frosted Pop-Tarts are essential to the experience!
Jordan Peterson: [Nodding thoughtfully, raising his hand as if to make a careful point] I think you’re overlooking something here, Cartman. The frosting, yes, it does provide that instant gratification we all crave. It’s a shortcut to pleasure. But in the long run, our tendency to seek out the immediate reward—the sugar rush, the frosting—is, in some ways, the epitome of modern consumerism. It's the tendency to choose instant pleasure over the appreciation of something that might take a little more effort to enjoy. The unfrosted Pop-Tart... it doesn’t promise you an easy escape. It requires a more thoughtful approach. It’s simpler, yes, but that’s the beauty of it. It makes you think. You don't need the frosting to feel whole. It’s about developing an appreciation for what’s there, not just what’s added.
Eric Cartman: [Shaking his head, now seriously frustrated, holding up an unfrosted Pop-Tart like it's a criminal evidence] Are you seriously lecturing me about appreciating what’s inside? Who cares about what’s inside if it tastes like garbage? Look, I get it, okay? You’re trying to make a point, but frosting is like... like the whole reason Pop-Tarts exist! It’s the perfect combination of sweet, crunchy, and gooey! You can’t just strip that away and pretend like it’s still the same thing. What you’re talking about—this “appreciating the simplicity” thing—sounds like some sort of lame, self-righteous philosophy that’s totally wrong! I’ll say it again—anything other than frosted Pop-Tarts is absolutely unacceptable.
Jordan Peterson: [Pausing, then smiling slightly, amused at Cartman’s passionate reaction] You’re a man of strong convictions, I’ll give you that, Cartman. But, there’s a deeper truth here. The unfrosted Pop-Tart forces us to confront the idea of moderation—to recognize that not everything needs to be extravagant to have value. Yes, the frosting gives immediate satisfaction, but it’s the unfrosted Pop-Tart that can teach us something about delayed gratification and restraint. It’s not about depriving yourself of pleasure; it’s about understanding that sometimes, the simpler things are just as valuable.
Eric Cartman: [Crossing his arms, huffing, still holding the unfrosted Pop-Tart as if it's a weapon] Whatever, man. You can keep your plain, boring Pop-Tarts. I’m sticking with the good ones. Frosted forever! [He takes a dramatic bite of his unfrosted Pop-Tart, grimaces, and then immediately pulls out a frosted one from his bag, taking a much more satisfied bite.]
Jordan Peterson: [Chuckling softly, shaking his head, still calm] There it is. You’ve made your choice, Cartman. But one day, you might come to appreciate the simple things. Perhaps... just perhaps, you’ll see the value in the unfrosted ones.
Eric Cartman: [Through a mouthful of frosting, smugly] Nope. Frosted all the way, buddy. [Waves him off dismissively]
[Scene fades as Peterson and Cartman continue their food battle, each firmly entrenched in their Pop-Tart philosophy.]
End scene.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/over-10-south-koreas-workforce-now-robotic-survey-finds
More than 10% of South Korea's workforce is now robotic, survey finds
Robot adoption in factories around the world continues at a rapid pace
More than 10% of South Korea's workforce is now robotic, survey finds
Robot adoption in factories around the world continues at a rapid pace
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/23/dat...-use-more-electricity-than-entire-cities.html
Data centers powering artificial intelligence could use more electricity than entire cities
Data centers powering artificial intelligence could use more electricity than entire cities
Prompt . Right, a rap battle between Sam Harris and Donald Trump
Here’s a creative and engaging rap
battle between Sam Harris (philosopher and neuroscientist) and Donald Trump (businessman and former U.S. president). It’s crafted in good humor, respecting their personalities and public personas.
---
Sam Harris
Yo, it’s Sam Harris, let me drop some clarity,
Your rhetoric’s a mess; let’s talk about disparity.
You claim to be a genius, a master of the game,
But your logic's as bankrupt as your casino’s name.
I deal in facts, science, and reason,
Your tweets flip-flop like the changing seasons.
While I’m seeking truth in this philosophical grind,
You’re busy redefining “alternative” mind.
---
Donald Trump
Listen up, Sam, you’re not in my league,
I built an empire; you just critique.
I’ve got towers, planes, and a world-class brand,
While you sit in podcasts, talking bland.
They love me, Sam, my rallies are fire,
Crowds so big, they call me the sire.
You want facts? I’ve got stats galore,
Check the economy—record highs, explore!
---
Sam Harris
Crowds and cheers don’t make you right,
Your claims are as shaky as your Twitter at night.
I’m cutting through the noise, the bias, the spin,
You’re selling gold-plated ego within.
I talk free will, consciousness, AI debates,
While you’re busy hyping walls and gates.
Your legacy’s a spectacle, loud and crude,
But history remembers depth, not attitude.
---
Donald Trump
Depth? Please, your books barely sell,
I’m a bestseller, Sam, can’t you tell?
Philosophy's boring; I make it exciting,
Your crowd’s asleep while I’m igniting.
I’ve got the art of the deal, the art of the win,
Sam, face it, you’ll never get in.
They chant my name, while you stay obscure,
You’re a podcast host—I’m a legend, for sure!
---
Sam Harris
Legend in your mind, inflated and grand,
Here’s a creative and engaging rap
battle between Sam Harris (philosopher and neuroscientist) and Donald Trump (businessman and former U.S. president). It’s crafted in good humor, respecting their personalities and public personas.
---
Sam Harris
Yo, it’s Sam Harris, let me drop some clarity,
Your rhetoric’s a mess; let’s talk about disparity.
You claim to be a genius, a master of the game,
But your logic's as bankrupt as your casino’s name.
I deal in facts, science, and reason,
Your tweets flip-flop like the changing seasons.
While I’m seeking truth in this philosophical grind,
You’re busy redefining “alternative” mind.
---
Donald Trump
Listen up, Sam, you’re not in my league,
I built an empire; you just critique.
I’ve got towers, planes, and a world-class brand,
While you sit in podcasts, talking bland.
They love me, Sam, my rallies are fire,
Crowds so big, they call me the sire.
You want facts? I’ve got stats galore,
Check the economy—record highs, explore!
---
Sam Harris
Crowds and cheers don’t make you right,
Your claims are as shaky as your Twitter at night.
I’m cutting through the noise, the bias, the spin,
You’re selling gold-plated ego within.
I talk free will, consciousness, AI debates,
While you’re busy hyping walls and gates.
Your legacy’s a spectacle, loud and crude,
But history remembers depth, not attitude.
---
Donald Trump
Depth? Please, your books barely sell,
I’m a bestseller, Sam, can’t you tell?
Philosophy's boring; I make it exciting,
Your crowd’s asleep while I’m igniting.
I’ve got the art of the deal, the art of the win,
Sam, face it, you’ll never get in.
They chant my name, while you stay obscure,
You’re a podcast host—I’m a legend, for sure!
---
Sam Harris
Legend in your mind, inflated and grand,
Microsoft is now releasing agents designed to replace "repetitive tasks". What government job does not include repetitive tasks?
For example, think of all the tax returns done each year. Granted there is some creativity required, but for 90% of those it is repetitive task. Likewise with auditing them. Imagine if 90% of tax preparers were replaced with AI.
According to Microsoft their agents can reduce labor in administrative tasks by 30%. That sounds like they are ready to replace 30% of white collar workers.
Already robots have replaced 10% of blue collar workers in Korea and presumably could do the same in any other country.
Imagine a world where 10% of the blue collar workers and 30% of the white collar workers are laid off in the next six months.
For example, think of all the tax returns done each year. Granted there is some creativity required, but for 90% of those it is repetitive task. Likewise with auditing them. Imagine if 90% of tax preparers were replaced with AI.
According to Microsoft their agents can reduce labor in administrative tasks by 30%. That sounds like they are ready to replace 30% of white collar workers.
Already robots have replaced 10% of blue collar workers in Korea and presumably could do the same in any other country.
Imagine a world where 10% of the blue collar workers and 30% of the white collar workers are laid off in the next six months.
I asked ChatGPT to "imagine a world where 10% of blue collar workers and 30% of white collar workers are laid off in the next six months"
If 10% of blue-collar workers and 30% of white-collar workers were laid off in the next six months, the consequences could be widespread and highly disruptive. The specific impacts would depend on various factors, but here's an outline of how it might play out in different aspects of society and the economy:
Economic Impact
If 10% of blue-collar workers and 30% of white-collar workers were laid off in the next six months, the consequences could be widespread and highly disruptive. The specific impacts would depend on various factors, but here's an outline of how it might play out in different aspects of society and the economy:
Economic Impact
- Unemployment Surge:
- For blue-collar workers, this could mean millions of people losing jobs in sectors like manufacturing, construction, transportation, and utilities. While blue-collar jobs often face cyclical fluctuations, a mass layoff could lead to a spike in unemployment, especially in industries reliant on physical labor.
- The 30% reduction in white-collar jobs (such as those in finance, tech, healthcare, education, etc.) could also result in a significant increase in unemployment in these sectors, which are often seen as more stable.
- Consumer Spending Decline:
- Blue-collar workers often represent a significant portion of consumer spending in sectors like retail, housing, and leisure. With fewer people employed, disposable income would drop, leading to decreased demand for goods and services.
- White-collar workers typically have more discretionary income, so their job losses could cause a slowdown in industries that cater to higher-income consumers, like luxury goods, travel, and real estate.
- Skill Gaps and Job Market Shifts:
- The economy could face a mismatch between available workers and available jobs. Those who lose their white-collar positions may struggle to find suitable replacements if they don't have the technical or vocational skills required for emerging industries.
- The blue-collar job market could see some shift as automation and AI continue to replace certain manual labor tasks, although certain jobs will remain essential.
- Increased Inequality:
- A disproportionate number of layoffs in white-collar sectors could exacerbate wealth inequality, especially if the job losses primarily affect higher-paying industries, leaving many struggling to adjust to lower-wage or less stable employment.
- Conversely, blue-collar workers typically face a greater level of job insecurity and often don't have the same social safety nets or severance packages that white-collar workers might receive. This could increase poverty and financial insecurity for these groups.
- Social Unrest and Mental Health Strain:
- Prolonged unemployment or underemployment can lead to rising stress, anxiety, and mental health issues. Those who lose their jobs may experience a loss of identity and community, particularly if their role in the workforce was central to their sense of purpose or livelihood.
- On a larger scale, if unemployment rises sharply, it could lead to protests, strikes, or a general feeling of social unrest, particularly if government responses (such as unemployment benefits or retraining programs) are seen as inadequate.
- Increased Demand for Government Support:
- Governments would likely need to expand unemployment benefits and job retraining programs. However, if the scale of layoffs is vast, these measures may strain public resources and lead to debates over the sustainability of social programs.
- There could be more pressure to increase universal basic income (UBI) or other welfare reforms as a way to cushion the blow for displaced workers.
- Corporate Restructuring:
- Many companies could see it as an opportunity to restructure, cutting costs through automation or outsourcing. Blue-collar industries like manufacturing may invest more heavily in automation, while white-collar sectors like finance and tech could increase reliance on AI or offshoring.
- However, businesses that lay off a significant percentage of their workforce might see a dip in productivity and morale, which could negatively impact long-term profits and growth.
- Talent Shortages and Labor Market Imbalance:
- A massive displacement of workers, especially in specialized white-collar roles, could lead to talent shortages in specific industries. While some sectors would see an oversupply of workers (e.g., administrative assistants, customer service), others (e.g., tech, healthcare) could see shortages, even if unemployment is high overall.
- This mismatch could push wages up in certain industries and exacerbate inflationary pressures in the economy.
- Small Business Struggles:
- Small businesses, which often rely on a mix of both blue and white-collar workers, could face a double blow. They might see reduced consumer demand as unemployed workers spend less, while also losing valuable employees to larger corporations able to weather the storm better.
- Increased Automation:
- With both blue-collar and white-collar workers losing jobs, many companies might look to automation and AI as a means of cutting costs. This could lead to faster adoption of technologies like robotic process automation (RPA) for white-collar tasks (e.g., data entry, customer service, financial analysis) and advanced robotics or AI in blue-collar industries like manufacturing and logistics.
- Growth in Gig and Remote Work:
- The rise of the gig economy and remote work could increase as displaced workers from both sectors look for flexible, short-term work opportunities. However, gig work often lacks the stability, benefits, and wages of full-time employment, potentially leading to a growing underclass of precarious workers.
- Shift in Education and Training Needs:
- As traditional job roles vanish, there may be a greater demand for skills in fields like AI, cybersecurity, renewable energy, and other high-growth sectors. This would put pressure on educational institutions to adapt and provide more accessible training programs that can quickly upskill workers in a changing job market.
- Recovery and Adaptation: The long-term outlook would depend heavily on how quickly displaced workers can retrain and transition into new roles. Governments and companies that prioritize reskilling and workforce development would help mitigate the effects, while those that don't could see a protracted economic downturn.
- Potential for a "New Normal": If automation and AI adoption accelerate, this could lead to a redefined labor market where fewer people are needed for certain tasks. The concept of a "job for life" may become obsolete, and workers may need to continuously adapt to changing roles, skills, and industries.
-
1
- Show all
Why we will be seeing mass layoffs over the next seven months and few if any college graduates getting jobs with fortune 500 companies next June.
Imagine you have two candidates
One has an IQ of 110 putting them in the top 25% of Americans (AI) and the other has an IQ of 120 putting them in the top 9% of Americans -- typical college grad from elite university (TCG).
AI does have a few advantages though. Although it is scoring in the top 25% on virtually all tests our TCG is in the top 9% but only on a couple of those tests, two or three. Also TCG will work 40 hours a week, while AI will work 168 hours a week. Also AI can do most tasks asked of it in a small fraction of the time that TCG will take. Also less than 2 years ago AI was operating at the high school level and now it is operating at the grad school level. Within six months it is expected that AI will have an IQ of 120 and score in the top 10% of all the graduate exams given it. One other thing, AI will work at a fraction of the salary as TCG, does not require any benefits package, and will not sue the company.
Now I can see hiring the top 1% of graduates, but why would anyone hire the other 99% of them next June for a white collar job?
Already they are saying that AI can do the repetitive tasks. Realistically speaking at a Fortune 500 company or at a government job what percent of the tasks are "repetitive"? Surely this means you can replace 50% of your employees.
Imagine you have two candidates
One has an IQ of 110 putting them in the top 25% of Americans (AI) and the other has an IQ of 120 putting them in the top 9% of Americans -- typical college grad from elite university (TCG).
AI does have a few advantages though. Although it is scoring in the top 25% on virtually all tests our TCG is in the top 9% but only on a couple of those tests, two or three. Also TCG will work 40 hours a week, while AI will work 168 hours a week. Also AI can do most tasks asked of it in a small fraction of the time that TCG will take. Also less than 2 years ago AI was operating at the high school level and now it is operating at the grad school level. Within six months it is expected that AI will have an IQ of 120 and score in the top 10% of all the graduate exams given it. One other thing, AI will work at a fraction of the salary as TCG, does not require any benefits package, and will not sue the company.
Now I can see hiring the top 1% of graduates, but why would anyone hire the other 99% of them next June for a white collar job?
Already they are saying that AI can do the repetitive tasks. Realistically speaking at a Fortune 500 company or at a government job what percent of the tasks are "repetitive"? Surely this means you can replace 50% of your employees.