K
Khorib2
Guest
10 years later, the real story behind Columbine - USATODAY.com
While I just came across this, it was released about a year ago all of the myths surrounding the Columbine Incident and I have to say it was an interesting read. Apparently they were not targeting any particular group, not gays, minorities or even Christians. They had one goal in mind, which was to achieve a higher body count than the Oklahoma City bombing and were killing at random... even their friends who ran up to them thinking they were pulling a prank with paintball guns.
The reason I highlighted "The girl who said 'yes'" is because it was apparently fabricated. There is zero evidence that it ever happened. It was used by the local churches and press to rally support for the students. The girl who supposedly said this was represented by religious groups as a martyr in the shooting.
I'm curious if you feel this kind of fabrication should be considered positive or negative. While it may have strengthened the faith and resolve of many Christians, a book was even written about it, can you really stand behind it knowing this is completely false? This reminds me of the propagated myth of Charles Darwin's deathbed confession which is also completely unfounded.
What is your thoughts and feelings?
While I just came across this, it was released about a year ago all of the myths surrounding the Columbine Incident and I have to say it was an interesting read. Apparently they were not targeting any particular group, not gays, minorities or even Christians. They had one goal in mind, which was to achieve a higher body count than the Oklahoma City bombing and were killing at random... even their friends who ran up to them thinking they were pulling a prank with paintball guns.
The reason I highlighted "The girl who said 'yes'" is because it was apparently fabricated. There is zero evidence that it ever happened. It was used by the local churches and press to rally support for the students. The girl who supposedly said this was represented by religious groups as a martyr in the shooting.
I'm curious if you feel this kind of fabrication should be considered positive or negative. While it may have strengthened the faith and resolve of many Christians, a book was even written about it, can you really stand behind it knowing this is completely false? This reminds me of the propagated myth of Charles Darwin's deathbed confession which is also completely unfounded.
What is your thoughts and feelings?