I am not sure it is ignorance,
But maybe I should give him the benefit of the doubt?
Ignorance, as in he doesn't actually know what Scripture teaches.
I am not sure it is ignorance,
But maybe I should give him the benefit of the doubt?
Still waiting on Scripture from Paul's epistles...
No it says if we say we HAVE no sin, we are liars. That would be sin nature. If we say that we have no sin nature, we are liars. Sin is not something that we can possess; it is something we do by obeying the wrong nature.
Ignorance, as in he doesn't actually know what Scripture teaches.
It truly astounds me that people believe that if you're a christian, then christians don't sin, because they're saved. HELLO!!!! Even christians sin, every single day.. Christians are sinful humans, and humans sin on a daily basis. Christians are NOT exempt from sinning.
Huh? No the sin nature died with Christ. I think it's: If we say we have not sinned. Later he says I write you this so you don't sin and if you sin (not when, if, not expecting you do the same thing over and over) there's 1 John 1:9.
If you did a sin and repented it's gone.
Jesus was tempted in the same way as us it says. I don't think He had a sin nature. He was no slave to sin. His body had an own will. He just said no to His members. So can we if we find out who we are in Him according to Thorben Sondergaard who doesn't have to do the same sin over and over again anymore. Doesn't mean he never commits a sin.
People like HRFTD have to lower the guiltiness or water down the law. so they can appear sinless.
Otherwise, their own legalism bites them on the dark side. (they can't practice what they preach in other words)
Wasn't Jesus tempted in the wilderness BEFORE going to be baptized in the Jordan where he received the Holy Spirit???
makes me kinda sad that hrftd used to argue strongly with Jason, yet now kind of sounds like him. ( you long-time members will get this, sorry for the newer folks).
Wasn't Jesus tempted in the wilderness BEFORE going to be baptized in the Jordan where he received the Holy Spirit???
People like HRFTD have to lower the guiltiness or water down the law. so they can appear sinless.
Otherwise, their own legalism bites them on the dark side. (they can't practice what they preach in other words)
You can always shine the light on salvation by works by talking about the blood of Christ. No one can speak against that. And the constant reminder of what His blood accomplished spurs us to live for Him.
"How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?" Heb 9:14
Well sorry but I didn't see him say anything wrong in this thread. I see a lot of false accusations though. He's not a legalist.
ahem... sorry, y'all, to jump in at the end again
legalism is saying Christ plus something for salvation.
it's not legalism, imho, to say there will be the fruit of justification.
y'know... by their fruit you'll know them and so forth.