Genesis one

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
Numbers 27

God tells Moses to lay his hands on Joshua who is to become the new leader of Israel to lead the people into the promised land!

- Then he must commission him before Eleazar the priest and before all the assembly!
 

UnoiAmarah

Junior Member
Jul 28, 2017
740
128
43
Genesis 1

Day one :

- Light
- A division between light and darkness


Day two :

- A division between the waters (beneath the expanse) and the waters (above the expanse)

Day three :

- A division between the seas and the dry land earth
- Grass and seed-bearing plants and trees yielding fruit along with seed on the earth


Day four :

- The greater luminary to dominate the day
- The lesser luminary to dominate the night
- The stars


Day five :

- The sea creatures
- The flying creatures


Day six :

- Domestic animals
- creeping animals
- Wild animals
- Man (male and female)
- Man must have in subjection all the animals
- Green vegetation for food
While a Hexaemeron is an excellent starting point, if I could make a suggestion, it would be that it be more in-depth. While you did follow up with addition information, yet you might have described the meaning of the term “create” which has a unique and distinct meaning from the one it has in common usage.

While the common usage of the term defines it as simply making or developing something new yet in Genesis 1 it has a unique and distinct meaning. which defines it as “bringing something into existence which has never existed before in nature or form prior to its being created.” In such, the term ‘create’ in Genesis does not infer a process in which some preexisting substance is transformed into a different form.

Moreover, the term ‘create’ also infers by implication that it is a divine act. Thus, except but for the divine act that brought it into existence, if could not have come into existence by any process of nature.

But nice work.
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
Numbers 31


- God tells Moses to defeat Midian to execute God’s vengeance on Midian!

- They kill the men and the kings and Balaam and make captive the women and children of Midian and plunderall their domestic animals and livestock and all their possessions and they burn their cities!

- Moses grows indignant at the leaders because they have preserved all the females who had the Israelites sinnede against God!

- Now he tells them to kill everyone except the virgins!
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
While a Hexaemeron is an excellent starting point, if I could make a suggestion, it would be that it be more in-depth. While you did follow up with addition information, yet you might have described the meaning of the term “create” which has a unique and distinct meaning from the one it has in common usage.

While the common usage of the term defines it as simply making or developing something new yet in Genesis 1 it has a unique and distinct meaning. which defines it as “bringing something into existence which has never existed before in nature or form prior to its being created.” In such, the term ‘create’ in Genesis does not infer a process in which some preexisting substance is transformed into a different form.

Moreover, the term ‘create’ also infers by implication that it is a divine act. Thus, except but for the divine act that brought it into existence, if could not have come into existence by any process of nature.

But nice work.
Let's have a look at

https://biblehub.com/genesis/1-1.htm

and especially at the Hebrew meaning of created:

Hebrew
In the beginning
בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית (bə·rê·šîṯ)
Preposition-b | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 7225: The first, in place, time, order, rank

God
אֱלֹהִ֑ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative

created
בָּרָ֣א (bā·rā)
Verb - Qal - Perfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 1254: To create, to cut down, select, feed

the heavens
הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם (haš·šā·ma·yim)
Article | Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 8064: Heaven, sky

and
וְאֵ֥ת (wə·’êṯ)
Conjunctive waw | Direct object marker
Strong's 853: Untranslatable mark of the accusative case

the earth.
הָאָֽרֶץ׃ (hā·’ā·reṣ)
Article | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 776: Earth, land


And the different commentaries:

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
THE CREATIVE WEEK (Genesis 1:1 to Genesis 2:3).
(1) In the beginning.--Not, as in John 1:1, "from eternity," but in the beginning of this sidereal system, of which our sun, with its attendant planets, forms a part. As there never was a time when God did not exist, and as activity is an essential part of His being (John 5:17), so, probably, there was never a time when worlds did not exist; and in the process of calling them into existence when and how He willed, we may well believe that God acted in accordance with the working of some universal law, of which He is Himself the author. It was natural with St. John, when placing the same words at the commencement of his Gospel, to carry back our minds to a more absolute conceivable "beginning," when the work of creation had not commenced, and when in the whole universe there was only God.
God.--Heb., Elohim. A word plural in form, but joined with a verb singular, except when it refers to the false gods of the heathen, in which case it takes a verb plural. Its root-meaning is strength, power; and the form Elohim is not to be regarded as a pluralis majestatis, but as embodying the effort of early human thought in feeling after the Deity, and in arriving at the conclusion that the Deity was One. Thus, in the name Elohim it included in one Person all the powers, mights, and influences by which the world was first created and is now governed and maintained. In the Vedas, in the hymns recovered for us by the decipherment of the cuneiform inscriptions, whether Accadian or Semitic, and in all other ancient religious poetry, we find these powers ascribed to different beings; in the Bible alone Elohim is one. Christians may also well see in this a foreshadowing of the plurality of persons in the Divine Trinity; but its primary lesson is that, however diverse may seem the working of the powers of nature, the Worker is one and His work one.
Created.--Creation, in its strict sense of producing something out of nothing, contains an idea so noble and elevated that naturally human language could only gradually rise up to it. It is quite possible, therefore, that the word bara, "he created," may originally have signified to hew stone or fell timber; but as a matter of fact it is a rare word, and employed chiefly or entirely in connection with the activity of God. As, moreover, "the heaven and the earth" can only mean the totality of all existent things, the idea of creating them out of nothing is contained in the very form of the sentence. Even in Genesis 1:21; Genesis 1:27, where the word may signify something less than creation ex nihilo, there is nevertheless a passage from inert matter to animate life, for which science knows no force, or process, or energy capable of its accomplishment. . . .
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
While a Hexaemeron is an excellent starting point, if I could make a suggestion, it would be that it be more in-depth. While you did follow up with addition information, yet you might have described the meaning of the term “create” which has a unique and distinct meaning from the one it has in common usage.

While the common usage of the term defines it as simply making or developing something new yet in Genesis 1 it has a unique and distinct meaning. which defines it as “bringing something into existence which has never existed before in nature or form prior to its being created.” In such, the term ‘create’ in Genesis does not infer a process in which some preexisting substance is transformed into a different form.

Moreover, the term ‘create’ also infers by implication that it is a divine act. Thus, except but for the divine act that brought it into existence, if could not have come into existence by any process of nature.

But nice work.
Pulpit Commentary
Verse 1. - In the beginning, Bereshith, is neither "from eternity," as in John 1:1; nor "in wisdom" (Chaldee paraphrase), as if parallel with Proverbs 3:19 and Psalm 104:24; nor "by Christ," who, in Colossians 1:18, is denominated ἀρχὴ; but "at the commencement of time." Without indicating when the beginning was, the expression intimates that the beginning was. Exodus 20:11 seems to imply that this was the initiation of the first day's work. The formula, "And God said," with which each day opens, rather points to ver. 3 as its proper terminus a quo, which the beginning absolute may have antedated by an indefinite period. God Elohim (either the highest Being to be feared, from alah, to fear, - Hengstenberg, Delitzsch, Keil, Oehler, etc., or, more probably, the strong and mighty One, from aul, to be strong - Gesenius, Lange, Tayler Lewis, Macdonald, Murphy, etc.) is the most frequent designation of the Supreme Being in the Old Testament, occurring upwards of 2000 times, and is exclusively employed in the present section. Its plural form is to be explained neither as a remnant of polytheism (Gesenius), nor as indicating a plurality of beings through whom the Deity reveals himself (Baumgarten, Lange), nor as a plural of majesty (Aben Ezra, Kalisch, Alford), like the royal "we" of earthly potentates, a usage which the best Hebraists affirm to have no existence in the Scriptures (Macdonald), nor as a cumulative plural, answering the same purpose as a repetition of the Divine name (Hengstenberg, Dreschler, and others); but either
(1) as a pluralis intensitatis, expressive of the fullness of the Divine nature, and the multiplicity of the Divine powers (Delitzsch, Murphy, Macdonald); or,
(2) notwithstanding Calvin s dread of Sabellianism, as a pluralis trinitatis, intended to foreshadow the threefold personality of the Godhead (Luther, Cocceius, Peter Lombard, Murphy, Candlish, etc.); or
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
While a Hexaemeron is an excellent starting point, if I could make a suggestion, it would be that it be more in-depth. While you did follow up with addition information, yet you might have described the meaning of the term “create” which has a unique and distinct meaning from the one it has in common usage.

While the common usage of the term defines it as simply making or developing something new yet in Genesis 1 it has a unique and distinct meaning. which defines it as “bringing something into existence which has never existed before in nature or form prior to its being created.” In such, the term ‘create’ in Genesis does not infer a process in which some preexisting substance is transformed into a different form.

Moreover, the term ‘create’ also infers by implication that it is a divine act. Thus, except but for the divine act that brought it into existence, if could not have come into existence by any process of nature.

But nice work.
(3) both. The suggestion of Tayler Lewis, that the term may be a contraction for El-Elohim, the God of all superhuman powers, is inconsistent with neither of the above interpretations That the Divine name should adjust itself without difficulty to all subsequent discoveries of the fullness of the Divine personality and nature is only what we should expect in a God-given revelation. Unless where it refers to the angels (Psalm 8:5), or to heathen deities (Genesis 31:32; Exodus 20:3; Jeremiah 16:20), or to earthly rulers (Exodus 22:8, 9), Elohim is conjoined with verbs and adjectives in the singular, an anomaly in language which has been explained as suggesting the unity of the Godhead. Created. Bara, one of three terms employed in this section, and in Scripture generally, to describe the Divine activity; the other two being yatzar, "formed," and asah, "made" - both signifying to construct out of pre-existing materials (cf. for yatzar, Genesis 2:7; Genesis 8:19; Psalm 33:15; Isaiah 44:9; for asah, Genesis 8:6; Exodus 5:16; Deuteronomy 4:16), and predicable equally of God and man. Barn is used exclusively of God. Though not necessarily involved in its significance, the idea of creation ex nihilo is acknowledged by the best expositors to be here intended. Its employment in vers. 21, 26, though seem ugly against, is really in favor of a distinctively creative act; in both of these instances something that did not previously exist, i.e. animal life and the human spirit, having been called into being. In the sense of producing what is new it frequently occurs in Scripture (cf. Psalm 51:12; Jeremiah 31:12; Isaiah 65:18). Thus, according to the teaching of this venerable document, the visible universe neither existed from eternity, nor was fashioned out of pre-existing materials, nor proceeded forth as an emanation from the Absolute, but was summoned into being by an express creative fiat. The New Testament boldly claims this as a doctrine peculiar to revelation (Hebrews 11:3). Modern science explicitly disavows it as a discovery of reason. The continuity of force admits of neither creation nor annihilation, but demands an unseen universe, out of which the visible has been produced "by an intelligent agency residing in the unseen," and into which it must eventually return ('The Unseen Universe,' pp. 167, 170). Whether the language of the writer to the Hebrews homologates the dogma of an "unseen universe" (μὴ φαινομένον), out of which τὸ βλεπόμενον γεγονέναι, the last result of science, as expressed by the authors of the above-named work, is practically an admission of the Biblical doctrine of creation. The heavens and the earth (i.e. mundus universus - Gesenius, Kalisch, etc. Cf. Genesis 2:1; Genesis 14:19, 22; Psalm 115:15; Jeremiah 23:24. The earth and the heavens always mean the terrestrial globe with its aerial firmament. Cf. Genesis 2:4; Psalm 148:13; Zechariah 5:9).
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
The earth here alluded to is manifestly not the dry land (ver. 10), which was not separated from the waters till the third day, but the entire mass of which our planet is composed, including the superincumbent atmosphere, which was not uplifted from the chaotic deep until the second day. The heavens are the rest of the universe. The Hebrews were aware of other heavens than the "firmament" or gaseous expanse which over-arches the earth. "Tres regiones," says Poole, "ubi ayes, ubi nubes, ubi sidera." But, beyond these, the Shemitie mind conceived of the heaven where the angels dwell (1 Kings 22:19; Matthew 18:10), and where God specially resides (Deuteronomy 26:15; 1 Kings 8:30; Psalm 2:4), if, indeed, this latter was not distinguished as a more exalted region than that occupied by any creature - as "the heaven of heavens," the pre-eminently sacred abode of the Supreme (Deuteronomy 10:14; 1 Kings 8:27; Psalm 105:16). The fundamental idea associated with the term was that of height (shamayim, literally, "the heights" - Gesenius, Furst). To the Greek mind heaven meant "the boundary" (οὑρανος, from ὁρος - Arist.), or, "the raised up" (from ὀρ - to be prominent - Liddell and Scott). The Latin spoke of "the con cavity" (coelum, allied to κοῖλος, hollow), or "the engraved" (from coelo, to engrave). The Saxon thought of "the heaved-up arch." The Hebrew imagined great spaces rising tier upon tier above the earth (which, m contradistinction, was named "the flats"), just as with regard to time he spoke of olamim (Gr. αἰῶνες). Though not anticipating modern astronomical discovery, he had yet enlarged conceptions of the dimensions of the stellar world (Genesis 15:5; Isaiah 40:26; Jeremiah 31:37; Amos 9:6); and, though unacquainted with our present geographical ideas of the earth's configuration, he was able to represent it as a globe, and as suspended upon nothing (Isaiah 40:11; Job 26:7-10; Proverbs 8:27). The connection of the present verse with those which follow has been much debated. The proposal of Aben Ezra, adopted by Calvin, to read, "In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, the earth was" is grammatically inadmissible. Equally objectionable on the ground of grammar is the suggestion of Bunsen and Ewald, to connect the first verse with the third, and make the second parenthetical; while it is opposed to that simplicity of construction which pervades the chapter. The device of Drs. Buckland and Chalmers, so favorably regarded by some harmonists of Scripture and geology, to read the first verse as a heading to the whole section, is exploded by the fact that no historical narration can begin with "and." To this Exodus 1. It is no exception, the second book of Moses being in reality a continuation of the first. Honest exegesis requires that ver. I shall be viewed as descriptive of the first of the series of Divine acts detailed in the chapter, and that ver. 2, while admitting of an interval, shall be held as coming in immediate succession - an interpretation, it may be said, which is fatal to the theory which discovers the geologic ages between the creative beginning and primeval chaos.

- And God created man out of dust!
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
1) For those who may be interested !

- A discussion I had somewhere about Adam !

Hi JLGJLG might I make a suggestion. Hardly anyone will read twenty replies made by the one who starts a thread as there is just way to much stuff to sort out and reply to. It would be better to just make your opening post as you explain what you want to bring to others and let others reply to that first before adding way to much more. That way we will know what it is you are presenting and will be able to discuss with you much better.

As per your first post, Adam was an individual who was given a command by God not to eat of the tree of good and evil. This was God's first command He made to one man. Now when God created Eve it became a majority of two until the generations grew in numbers. Starting with Eve being tempted and Adam, who forsook God's command, also fell to the temptation of lust in taking of the fruit of that tree as Satan working through that serpent enticed the two to eat and seeing that the lust of the eye brought sin into them, thus they fell away from fellowship with God becoming Spiritually dead within. Individuals vs majority carried over to Cain and Able as Able was faithful to God and His commands, where on the other hand Cain fell to the majority rule of evil killing his own brother out of jealousy and anger which now brought an individuals choice to either have a personal relationship with God and later His Son Christ Jesus or follow a majority rule socialistic society that denies the power of God and have no fear of God for they do not know Him.

God gives us choices as in a glorious eternal life with Him, or eternal torment in the lake of fire as we are either blessed or damned for the choices we make.
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
2) Thanks for the suggestion but it's not my first thread!
- I try different experiments!
- People are free to answer or not!
- Sometimes they start reading your thread a long time after you started it!
- You are right Adam received the command from God!
- He chose his wife instead of God!
- He didn't want to lose her!
- On the contrary, Job refuses to follow his wife when she told him to curse God and die!
- Adam was perfect, Job was imperfect but he chose God!
- Job is a faithful servant of God!
- Adam was not!
- Free will!
- God told Cain to change of attitude but he didn't care like the majority of people!
- Yes, we have free will!
- About eternal torment in the lake of fire, that's another story!
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
3) Yes, we do have free will and we can make bad choices at times, but Adam did not choose his wife as God took the rib from Adam and made him a help mate as she was called woman,

Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
4) CHRONOLOGY OF AN OPPOSITION TO GOD

1) God gives the command to the man (Genesis 2:16,17)

Biblehub Genesis 2:16

Hebrew


And the LORD
יְהוָ֣ה (Yah·weh)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 3068: LORD -- the proper name of the God of Israel

God
אֱלֹהִ֔ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative

commanded
וַיְצַו֙ (way·ṣaw)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Piel - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 6680: To lay charge (upon), give charge (to), command, order

[him],
הָֽאָדָ֖ם (hā·’ā·ḏām)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 120: Ruddy, a human being

“You may eat freely
אָכֹ֥ל (’ā·ḵōl)
Verb - Qal - Infinitive absolute
Strong's 398: To eat

from every
מִכֹּ֥ל (mik·kōl)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 3605: The whole, all, any, every

tree
עֵֽץ־ (‘êṣ-)
Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 6086: Tree, trees, wood

of the garden,
הַגָּ֖ן (hag·gān)
Article | Noun - common singular
Strong's 1588: An enclosure, garden
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
5) Biblehub Genesis 2:17

Hebrew


but you must not
לֹ֥א (lō)
Adverb - Negative particle
Strong's 3808: Not, no

eat
תֹאכַ֖ל (ṯō·ḵal)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine singular
Strong's 398: To eat

from
מִמֶּ֑נּוּ (mim·men·nū)
Preposition | third person masculine singular
Strong's 4480: A part of, from, out of

the tree
וּמֵעֵ֗ץ (ū·mê·‘êṣ)
Conjunctive waw, Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 6086: Tree, trees, wood

of the knowledge
הַדַּ֙עַת֙ (had·da·‘aṯ)
Article | Noun - feminine singular construct
Strong's 1847: Knowledge

of good
ט֣וֹב (ṭō·wḇ)
Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 2896: Pleasant, agreeable, good

and evil;
וָרָ֔ע (wā·rā‘)
Conjunctive waw | Adjective - masculine singular
Strong's 7451: Bad, evil

for
כִּ֗י (kî)
Conjunction
Strong's 3588: A relative conjunction

in the day
בְּי֛וֹם (bə·yō·wm)
Preposition-b | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 3117: A day

that you eat
אֲכָלְךָ֥ (’ă·ḵā·lə·ḵā)
Verb - Qal - Infinitive construct | second person masculine singular
Strong's 398: To eat

of it,
מִמֶּ֖נּוּ (mim·men·nū)
Preposition | third person masculine singular
Strong's 4480: A part of, from, out of

you will surely
מ֥וֹת (mō·wṯ)
Verb - Qal - Infinitive absolute
Strong's 4191: To die, to kill

die.”
תָּמֽוּת׃ (tā·mūṯ)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine singular
Strong's 4191: To die, to kill
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
6)

2) God creates Eve (Genesis 2:18)

Biblehub Genesis 2:18

Hebrew


The LORD
יְהוָ֣ה (Yah·weh)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 3068: LORD -- the proper name of the God of Israel

God
אֱלֹהִ֔ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative

also said,
וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ (way·yō·mer)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

“[It is] not
לֹא־ (lō-)
Adverb - Negative particle
Strong's 3808: Not, no

good
ט֛וֹב (ṭō·wḇ)
Adjective - masculine singular
Strong's 2896: Pleasant, agreeable, good

for the man
הָֽאָדָ֖ם (hā·’ā·ḏām)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 120: Ruddy, a human being

to be
הֱי֥וֹת (hĕ·yō·wṯ)
Verb - Qal - Infinitive construct
Strong's 1961: To fall out, come to pass, become, be

alone.
לְבַדּ֑וֹ (lə·ḇad·dōw)
Preposition-l | Noun - masculine singular construct | third person masculine singular
Strong's 905: Separation, a part of the body, branch of a, tree, bar for, carrying, chief of

I will make
אֶֽעֱשֶׂהּ־ (’e·‘ĕ·śeh-)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - first person common singular
Strong's 6213: To do, make

for him
לּ֥וֹ‪‬ (lōw)
Preposition | third person masculine singular
Strong's Hebrew

a suitable
כְּנֶגְדּֽוֹ׃ (kə·neḡ·dōw)
Preposition-k | third person masculine singular
Strong's 5048: A front, part opposite, a counterpart, mate, over against, before

helper.”
עֵ֖זֶר (‘ê·zer)
Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 5828: A help, helper
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
7)



Biblehub Genesis 2:23

Hebrew


And the man
הָֽאָדָם֒ (hā·’ā·ḏām)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 120: Ruddy, a human being

said:
וַיֹּאמֶר֮ (way·yō·mer)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

“This
זֹ֣את (zōṯ)
Pronoun - feminine singular
Strong's 2063: Hereby in it, likewise, the one other, same, she, so much, such deed, that,

[is] now
הַפַּ֗עַם (hap·pa·‘am)
Article | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 6471: A beat, foot, anvil, occurrence

bone
עֶ֚צֶם (‘e·ṣem)
Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 6106: A bone, the body, the substance, selfsame

of my bones
מֵֽעֲצָמַ֔י (mê·‘ă·ṣā·may)
Preposition-m | Noun - feminine plural construct | first person common singular
Strong's 6106: A bone, the body, the substance, selfsame

and flesh
וּבָשָׂ֖ר (ū·ḇā·śār)
Conjunctive waw | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 1320: Flesh, body, person, the pudenda of a, man

of my flesh;
מִבְּשָׂרִ֑י (mib·bə·śā·rî)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct | first person common singular
Strong's 1320: Flesh, body, person, the pudenda of a, man

she
לְזֹאת֙ (lə·zōṯ)
Preposition-l | Pronoun - feminine singular
Strong's 2063: Hereby in it, likewise, the one other, same, she, so much, such deed, that,

shall be called
יִקָּרֵ֣א (yiq·qā·rê)
Verb - Nifal - Imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 7121: To call, proclaim, read

‘woman,’
אִשָּׁ֔ה (’iš·šāh)
Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 802: Woman, wife, female

for
כִּ֥י (kî)
Conjunction
Strong's 3588: A relative conjunction

out of man
מֵאִ֖ישׁ (mê·’îš)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 376: A man as an individual, a male person

she
זֹּֽאת׃ (zōṯ)
Pronoun - feminine singular
Strong's 2063: Hereby in it, likewise, the one other, same, she, so much, such deed, that,

was taken.”
לֻֽקֳחָה־ (lu·qo·ḥāh-)
Verb - QalPass - Perfect - third person feminine singular
Strong's 3947: To take



Biblehub Genesis 2:23

Hebrew


And the man
הָֽאָדָם֒ (hā·’ā·ḏām)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 120: Ruddy, a human being

said:
וַיֹּאמֶר֮ (way·yō·mer)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

“This
זֹ֣את (zōṯ)
Pronoun - feminine singular
Strong's 2063: Hereby in it, likewise, the one other, same, she, so much, such deed, that,

[is] now
הַפַּ֗עַם (hap·pa·‘am)
Article | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 6471: A beat, foot, anvil, occurrence

bone
עֶ֚צֶם (‘e·ṣem)
Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 6106: A bone, the body, the substance, selfsame

of my bones
מֵֽעֲצָמַ֔י (mê·‘ă·ṣā·may)
Preposition-m | Noun - feminine plural construct | first person common singular
Strong's 6106: A bone, the body, the substance, selfsame

and flesh
וּבָשָׂ֖ר (ū·ḇā·śār)
Conjunctive waw | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 1320: Flesh, body, person, the pudenda of a, man

of my flesh;
מִבְּשָׂרִ֑י (mib·bə·śā·rî)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct | first person common singular
Strong's 1320: Flesh, body, person, the pudenda of a, man

she
לְזֹאת֙ (lə·zōṯ)
Preposition-l | Pronoun - feminine singular
Strong's 2063: Hereby in it, likewise, the one other, same, she, so much, such deed, that,

shall be called
יִקָּרֵ֣א (yiq·qā·rê)
Verb - Nifal - Imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 7121: To call, proclaim, read

‘woman,’
אִשָּׁ֔ה (’iš·šāh)
Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 802: Woman, wife, female

for
כִּ֥י (kî)
Conjunction
Strong's 3588: A relative conjunction

out of man
מֵאִ֖ישׁ (mê·’îš)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 376: A man as an individual, a male person

she
זֹּֽאת׃ (zōṯ)
Pronoun - feminine singular
Strong's 2063: Hereby in it, likewise, the one other, same, she, so much, such deed, that,

was taken.”
לֻֽקֳחָה־ (lu·qo·ḥāh-)
Verb - QalPass - Perfect - third person feminine singular
Strong's 3947: To take
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
8)

Biblehub Genesis 2:24

Hebrew


For
עַל־ (‘al-)
Preposition
Strong's 5921: Above, over, upon, against

this reason
כֵּן֙ (kên)
Adverb
Strong's 3651: So -- thus

a man
אִ֔ישׁ (’îš)
Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 376: A man as an individual, a male person

will leave
יַֽעֲזָב־ (ya·‘ă·zāḇ-)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 5800: To loosen, relinquish, permit

his father
אָבִ֖יו (’ā·ḇîw)
Noun - masculine singular construct | third person masculine singular
Strong's 1: Father

and
וְאֶת־ (wə·’eṯ-)
Conjunctive waw | Direct object marker
Strong's 853: Untranslatable mark of the accusative case

his mother
אִמּ֑וֹ (’im·mōw)
Noun - feminine singular construct | third person masculine singular
Strong's 517: A mother, )

and
וְהָי֖וּ (wə·hā·yū)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Conjunctive perfect - third person common plural
Strong's 1961: To fall out, come to pass, become, be

be united
וְדָבַ֣ק (wə·ḏā·ḇaq)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Conjunctive perfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 1692: To impinge, cling, adhere, to catch by pursuit

to his wife,
בְּאִשְׁתּ֔וֹ (bə·’iš·tōw)
Preposition-b | Noun - feminine singular construct | third person masculine singular
Strong's 802: Woman, wife, female

and they will become one
אֶחָֽד׃ (’e·ḥāḏ)
Number - masculine singular
Strong's 259: United, one, first

flesh.
לְבָשָׂ֥ר (lə·ḇā·śār)
Preposition-l | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 1320: Flesh, body, person, the pudenda of a, man
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
9)

Biblehub Genesis 2:25

Hebrew


And the man
הָֽאָדָ֖ם (hā·’ā·ḏām)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 120: Ruddy, a human being

and his wife
וְאִשְׁתּ֑וֹ (wə·’iš·tōw)
Conjunctive waw | Noun - feminine singular construct | third person masculine singular
Strong's 802: Woman, wife, female

were
וַיִּֽהְי֤וּ (way·yih·yū)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine plural
Strong's 1961: To fall out, come to pass, become, be

both
שְׁנֵיהֶם֙ (šə·nê·hem)
Number - mdc | third person masculine plural
Strong's 8147: Two (a cardinal number)

naked,
עֲרוּמִּ֔ים (‘ă·rūm·mîm)
Adjective - masculine plural
Strong's 6174: Nude, either partially, totally

and they were not
וְלֹ֖א (wə·lō)
Conjunctive waw | Adverb - Negative particle
Strong's 3808: Not, no

ashamed.
יִתְבֹּשָֽׁשׁוּ׃ (yiṯ·bō·šā·šū)
Verb - Hitpael - Imperfect - third person masculine plural
Strong's 954: To pale, to be ashamed, to be disappointed, delayed
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
10)

- I understand why it is so difficult for people to understand such a unity between a man and a woman because it doesn’t exist anymore in our capitalistic society of greed and selfishness !

- In fact, everywhere the Bible speaks about unity and man’s tradition turns it into something else and our poor human society is based on disunity so far away from God !

- Then how is it possible to understand the Bible and God’s spirit ?

- And here we are just at the beginning of the Bible !

- So think about the rest !

- I also understand why it is so difficult for people to understand the quality of God’s creation compared to man-made imitation when we look at our poor human society based on defects !

- I understand why it is so difficult for people to understand such a strong and simple relationship between man and woman as they were not ashamed of being naked !

- Man’s tradition has turned it into corruption as if they had the same mind as we have in a society based on sex and basic instincts !

- When we think of the different forms of love, we can only be lost because we live in a basic world !


https://www.elizabethrider.com/7-types-of-love-and-what-they-mean/

- According to Greek philosophy, here are the different kinds of love :

1) Eros – Romantic, Passionate love (of the body)

2) Philia – Affectionate, Friendly Love

3) Storge – Unconditional, Familial Love

4) Agape – Selfless, Universal Love

5) Ludus – Playful, Flirtatious Love

6) pragma – Commited, Long-Lasting Love

7) Philautia – Self Love
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
11)

3) The devil creates doubt in Eve’s mind about God’s command not to eat from the fruit of the tree. He didn’t try with Adam because Adam had received the command directly from God. He knew Adam would have told him to go away!

Biblehub Genesis 3:1 (second part)


And he said
וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ (way·yō·mer)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

to
אֶל־ (’el-)
Preposition
Strong's 413: Near, with, among, to

the woman,
הָ֣אִשָּׁ֔ה (hā·’iš·šāh)
Article | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 802: Woman, wife, female

“Did God
אֱלֹהִ֔ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative

really
כִּֽי־ (kî-)
Conjunction
Strong's 3588: A relative conjunction

say,
אָמַ֣ר (’ā·mar)
Verb - Qal - Perfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

‘You must not
לֹ֣א (lō)
Adverb - Negative particle
Strong's 3808: Not, no

eat
תֹֽאכְל֔וּ (ṯō·ḵə·lū)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine plural
Strong's 398: To eat

of any
מִכֹּ֖ל (mik·kōl)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 3605: The whole, all, any, every

tree
עֵ֥ץ (‘êṣ)
Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 6086: Tree, trees, wood

in the garden?’”
הַגָּֽן׃ (hag·gān)
Article | Noun - common singular
Strong's 1588: An enclosure, garden
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
12)

-Then Eve answers the devil

Biblehub Genesis 3:2


Hebrew
The woman
הָֽאִשָּׁ֖ה (hā·’iš·šāh)
Article | Noun - feminine singular
Strong's 802: Woman, wife, female

answered
וַתֹּ֥אמֶר (wat·tō·mer)
Conjunctive waw | Verb - Qal - Consecutive imperfect - third person feminine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

the serpent,
הַנָּחָ֑שׁ (han·nā·ḥāš)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 5175: A serpent

“We may eat
נֹאכֵֽל׃ (nō·ḵêl)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - first person common plural
Strong's 398: To eat

the fruit
מִפְּרִ֥י (mip·pə·rî)
Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 6529: Fruit

of the trees
עֵֽץ־ (‘êṣ-)
Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 6086: Tree, trees, wood

of the garden,
הַגָּ֖ן (hag·gān)
Article | Noun - common singular
Strong's 1588: An enclosure, garden
 

JLG

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
6,041
193
63
13)

Biblehub Genesis 3:3

Hebrew
but of the fruit
וּמִפְּרִ֣י (ū·mip·pə·rî)
Conjunctive waw, Preposition-m | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 6529: Fruit

of the tree
הָעֵץ֮ (hā·‘êṣ)
Article | Noun - masculine singular
Strong's 6086: Tree, trees, wood

in the middle
בְּתוֹךְ־ (bə·ṯō·wḵ-)
Preposition-b | Noun - masculine singular construct
Strong's 8432: A bisection, the centre

of the garden,
הַגָּן֒ (hag·gān)
Article | Noun - common singular
Strong's 1588: An enclosure, garden

God
אֱלֹהִ֗ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative

has said,
אָמַ֣ר (’ā·mar)
Verb - Qal - Perfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 559: To utter, say

‘You must not
לֹ֤א (lō)
Adverb - Negative particle
Strong's 3808: Not, no

eat
תֹֽאכְלוּ֙ (ṯō·ḵə·lū)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine plural
Strong's 398: To eat

of it
מִמֶּ֔נּוּ (mim·men·nū)
Preposition | third person masculine singular
Strong's 4480: A part of, from, out of

[or]
וְלֹ֥א (wə·lō)
Conjunctive waw | Adverb - Negative particle
Strong's 3808: Not, no

touch
תִגְּע֖וּ (ṯig·gə·‘ū)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine plural
Strong's 5060: To touch, lay the hand upon, to reach, violently, to strike

it,
בּ֑וֹ (bōw)
Preposition | third person masculine singular
Strong's Hebrew

[or]
פֶּן־ (pen-)
Conjunction
Strong's 6435: Removal, lest

you will die.’”
תְּמֻתֽוּן׃ (tə·mu·ṯūn)
Verb - Qal - Imperfect - second person masculine plural | Paragogic nun
Strong's 4191: To die, to kill