Revelation 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Replacement theology has an unusual number of people believing that God is in the fallen sinner's game of marrying, divorcing and marrying another. This clearly defies what is written, as can be seen from a systematic study:
Jeremiah 3:8, 11-12, 14
8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also. ...
11 And the LORD said unto me, The backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah.
12 Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the LORD; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the LORD, and I will not keep anger for ever. ...
14 Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:
We've all heard that the wedding ceremony is for the bride. Looking at these verses, and I encourage the reading of the entire context, we see that the Lord put Israel away with a bill of divorcement. It's expected that some Bible Cemetery trained individuals will nay-say this, but I will say it on the basis of the clear language of these passages and their context: The Lord clearly stated in verse 14, "...I am married unto you...", even after having put Israel away with a bill of divorcement.
The sad habit is very real for some who ignore tense and nuances within the text by way of speed reading, which means they overlook many details, the missing of which serves as justification for their false beliefs. In pride they boast of how many times they have read the Bible, a practice that leads to them missing so much of the richness of absolute truths that can only be gleaned by systematic and meticulous study. I've even heard some brag about having read the Bible more times than their age from men in their 70's. I remain unimpressed with the numbers they spout, for their ignorance of the scriptures is betrayed in their false beliefs and teachings.
What we can see in this text and its context is that the Lord gave to Israel a divorcement, and yet HE was still married to her. It was SHE who was divorced, and it will be SHE who will be joined back unto the Lord once more toward the end of the Tribulation (Revelation 19). That wedding is for the bride, not the groom, for the groom, dare we believe what He stated through Jeremiah, that He remained married...committed to Israel as HIs bride and wife.
This foolishness that so many have bought into in trying to force the body of Christ into the place of Israel...again, nothing but the trash of replacement theology that defies the clear language of scripture. That city, adorned as His bride, occupied by the remnant of Israel, not the body of Christ, adorned and made ready as His bride, THAT is the reality we should all be embracing. The body of Christ will be where the Lord said we will be, which is in Heavenly places:
Ephesians 1:3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
Ephesians 2:6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
The new earth will not be in Heavenly places. It will be an earth like this one, only free of all sin after this old earth is burned up. The text gives us no reason to allegorize/etherealize the new earth as being only an adjective, but rather a noun. How much more clear can it be stated when it says that the New Jerusalem descends down from God OUT OF HEAVEN...? I mean, seriously, these things remain a mystery to those who do not study their Bibles, or only read the Bible like a novel rather than to study it in detail.
MM