How are we made in the Image of God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Reddogs

Active member
Sep 17, 2025
236
105
43
We see what it says when man was created..
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We see what Christ said to Philip when he asked to see God the Father..
John 14:9
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

So how was man created in image made to resemble God.
 
We see what it says when man was created..
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We see what Christ said to Philip when he asked to see God the Father..
John 14:9
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

So how was man created in image made to resemble God.

Genesis 3:22
And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
Scripture goes on to say, God put a Cherubim with a flaming sword to guard the tree of life, until the Son comes to do his perfect work on earth for us the people all of us equally.
Which was not understood then un til the risen Son, that frees people in love and mercy to all, regardless of what others do or not do, thank you
Psalm 82:6
I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.

Tell you, or you a god? Do you run things, are you in charge? Did you make the earth, The Crocodile, The pests? Anything?
Talk to God in your own prayer closet please, choose today, life or death please, willingly. Jesus did that once for us all to choose. Who went to that cross willingly without any flesh fight back!
Amazing "the art of fighting without fighting back"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tall_Timbers
We see what it says when man was created..
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We see what Christ said to Philip when he asked to see God the Father..
John 14:9
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

So how was man created in image made to resemble God.

The image of God is an innocent nature in flesh.

Which Jesus came in the image of God.

In the Old Testament Adam was made in the image of God.

The New Testament says Adam was made in the figure of Christ.

The image of God is the image of Christ.

God created Adam in the image that He would show in the future an innocent nature in flesh.

When Adam sinned he fell out of the image of God.

And no person was in the image of God until the man Christ Jesus was born.

And then all people led by the Spirit abstaining from sin which a Spirit led person will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh.

Which a person will not be led of the Spirit unless they are willing to give up sin and do good.
 
Genesis 1:26-27

English Standard Version

26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.

Man having three aspects, body, mind and spirit is used to say man is in God’s “likeness“. But image seems to imply a visible likeness.

Jesus said God is Spirit and all who come to Him must come in Spirit and truth. Perhaps it is for our human understanding that God is described as having hands, arms, a back, eyes, mouth and breath throughout the Bible.

God The Son has a body. But he did not receive it until around 2 BCE.

But, “Our image” in the English language translation implies more than one of the Trinity has an “image”.

Did I muddy the waters enough? 😉

Following this thread because my pastor is currently doing a study on Genesis 1-5.
 
Man having three aspects, body, mind and spirit is used to say man is in God’s “likeness“. But image seems to imply a visible likeness.

Jesus said God is Spirit and all who come to Him must come in Spirit and truth. Perhaps it is for our human understanding that God is described as having hands, arms, a back, eyes, mouth and breath throughout the Bible.

God The Son has a body. But he did not receive it until around 2 BCE.

But, “Our image” in the English language translation implies more than one of the Trinity has an “image”.

Did I muddy the waters enough? 😉

Following this thread because my pastor is currently doing a study on Genesis 1-5.
;) No,the waters were muddied centuries after Christ.

"The doctrine of the Trinity, as it is understood today, was not explicitly stated in the New Testament but was developed over time, particularly in the 4th and 5th centuries. The specific phrase found in 1 John 5:7, which is often cited as evidence of the Trinity, was added to the text in the 16th century and was not present in earlier Greek manuscripts."
ehrmanblog.org

incmedia.org

God is one,not Triune. God is more of a title when what "He" (God is not the male,a man), is actually Holy and a Spirit=Holy Spirit.
Jesus was God made flesh.

Besides God there is no Savior.
 
We see what it says when man was created..
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We see what Christ said to Philip when he asked to see God the Father..
John 14:9
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

So how was man created in image made to resemble God.

The word “image” seems to mean with the capacity to communicate with God and make moral choices (GN 1:26-31). It refers to God’s personality rather than to sexuality. The essential aspect of being a human rather than a robot or subhuman creature is God consciousness and moral conscience, which enables a person to experience love and meaning. This is what makes humans different from animals, whose behavior is governed mainly by instinct. Souls have awareness of “the requirements of the law”, which may be perceived via creation (Rom. 1:20).
 
An atheist? Yikes. Why would a Christian want to read what an atheist has to say on the Trinity?
Probably because he is a lapsed Christian and is a professor of New Testament studies who knows more about Scripture than any member here.
 
Probably because he is a lapsed Christian and is a professor of New Testament studies who knows more about Scripture than any member here.
Lots of deceived scholars about. I would caution anyone against listening to an atheist for Christian direction.
 
Lots of deceived scholars about. I would caution anyone against listening to an atheist for Christian direction.
You know nothing about Bart Ehrman.

I would caution anyone against judging a book my a label. When a Christian University keeps him on and he has Tenure,as a New Testament expert,those claiming he's possibly false are judging someone they know nothing about.

As I said, Bart Ehrman knows more about the scriptures than anyone here.

Thinking he's atheist makes that void,is silly. And indefensible.




https://ehrmanblog.org/about-bart/
About-Bart-D-Ehrman.jpg


Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He came to UNC in 1988, after four years of teaching at Rutgers University. At UNC he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies.

A graduate of Wheaton College (Illinois), Bart received both his Masters of Divinity and Ph.D. from Princeton Theological Seminary, where his 1985 doctoral dissertation was awarded magna cum laude. Since then he has published extensively in the fields of New Testament and Early Christianity, having written or edited twenty-six books, numerous scholarly articles, and dozens of book reviews.

Among his most recent books are Greek-English edition of the Apostolic Fathers for the Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press), a scholarly monograph on the use of literary forgery in early Christianity (Oxford University Press), and four New York Times Bestsellers: Misquoting Jesus (an overview of the changes found in the surviving copies of the New Testament and of the scribes who produced them), God’s Problem (an assessment of the biblical views of suffering), Jesus Interrupted ( an account of scholarly views of the New Testament), and Forged (a study of the books of the New Testament that were not actually written by their alleged authors). His books have been translated into twenty-seven languages.

Among his fields of scholarly expertise are the historical Jesus, the early Christian Apocrypha, the apostolic fathers, and the manuscript tradition of the New Testament.

Bart has served as President of the Southeast Region of the Society of Biblical Literature, chair of the New Testament textual criticism section of the Society, book review editor of the Journal of Biblical Literature, and editor of the monograph series The New Testament in the Greek Fathers (Scholars Press). He currently serves as co-editor of the series New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents (E. J. Brill), co-editor-in-chief for the journal Vigiliae Christianae, and on several other editorial boards for journals and monographs in the field.

Bart lectures extensively throughout the country. Winner of numerous university awards and grants, he is the recipient of the 2009 J. W. Pope “Spirit of Inquiry” Teaching Award, the 1993 UNC Undergraduate Student Teaching Award, the 1994 Phillip and Ruth Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement, and the Bowman and Gordon Gray Award for excellence in teaching.

Bart has two children, a daughter, Kelly, and a son, Derek. He is married to Sarah Beckwith (Ph.D., King’s College London), Marcello Lotti Professor of English at Duke University. He lives in Durham, North Carolina.
 
You know nothing about Bart Ehrman.

I would caution anyone against judging a book my a label. When a Christian University keeps him on and he has Tenure,as a New Testament expert,those claiming he's possibly false are judging someone they know nothing about.

As I said, Bart Ehrman knows more about the scriptures than anyone here.

Thinking he's atheist makes that void,is silly. And indefensible.




https://ehrmanblog.org/about-bart/
About-Bart-D-Ehrman.jpg


Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He came to UNC in 1988, after four years of teaching at Rutgers University. At UNC he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies.

A graduate of Wheaton College (Illinois), Bart received both his Masters of Divinity and Ph.D. from Princeton Theological Seminary, where his 1985 doctoral dissertation was awarded magna cum laude. Since then he has published extensively in the fields of New Testament and Early Christianity, having written or edited twenty-six books, numerous scholarly articles, and dozens of book reviews.

Among his most recent books are Greek-English edition of the Apostolic Fathers for the Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press), a scholarly monograph on the use of literary forgery in early Christianity (Oxford University Press), and four New York Times Bestsellers: Misquoting Jesus (an overview of the changes found in the surviving copies of the New Testament and of the scribes who produced them), God’s Problem (an assessment of the biblical views of suffering), Jesus Interrupted ( an account of scholarly views of the New Testament), and Forged (a study of the books of the New Testament that were not actually written by their alleged authors). His books have been translated into twenty-seven languages.

Among his fields of scholarly expertise are the historical Jesus, the early Christian Apocrypha, the apostolic fathers, and the manuscript tradition of the New Testament.

Bart has served as President of the Southeast Region of the Society of Biblical Literature, chair of the New Testament textual criticism section of the Society, book review editor of the Journal of Biblical Literature, and editor of the monograph series The New Testament in the Greek Fathers (Scholars Press). He currently serves as co-editor of the series New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents (E. J. Brill), co-editor-in-chief for the journal Vigiliae Christianae, and on several other editorial boards for journals and monographs in the field.

Bart lectures extensively throughout the country. Winner of numerous university awards and grants, he is the recipient of the 2009 J. W. Pope “Spirit of Inquiry” Teaching Award, the 1993 UNC Undergraduate Student Teaching Award, the 1994 Phillip and Ruth Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement, and the Bowman and Gordon Gray Award for excellence in teaching.

Bart has two children, a daughter, Kelly, and a son, Derek. He is married to Sarah Beckwith (Ph.D., King’s College London), Marcello Lotti Professor of English at Duke University. He lives in Durham, North Carolina.

So, share what he knows about the scriptures that makes atheism the right/best belief!
 
You know nothing about Bart Ehrman.
You erroneously assume and bear false witness against me. Why?

Bart Ehrman has identified as an atheist for more than 25 years, explaining that he no longer believes in God and has moved
past his evangelical Christian faith, though he also uses the term agnostic to describe his position on faith and epistemology.
 
You erroneously assume and bear false witness against me. Why?
If you knew his credentials you wouldn't say he has nothing to teach us because you judge him as an atheist first.
You witnessed against him.
Bart Ehrman has identified as atheist for more than 25 years, explaining that he no longer believes in God and has moved
past his evangelical Christian faith, though he also uses the term agnostic to describe his position on faith and epistemology.
And yet he is still learned.
 
If you knew his credentials you wouldn't say he has nothing to teach us because you judge him as an atheist first.
You witnessed against him.

And yet he is still learned.
Chuckie, I did not say he had nothing to teach. Why why why do you continue to lie, lie lie?

Telling you he is an atheist is not witnessing against him. He is an atheist by his own admission.

Jesus stated, "Whoever is not with Me is against Me, and whoever does not gather with Me scatters" (Luke 11 v 23 and
Matthew 12 v 30), emphasizing that there is no neutral position in the spiritual battle between Christ and Satan.
 
Lets not forget "after Out likeness" .

You know for years I would say "its just text" yet I could be wrong seems you can hmm see the tone maybe its the sweet holy Spirit but I don't care for it so.. out