So was I buddy. Maybe you missed that.I was being sarcastic.
Evidently Magenta thought your post was legit though.
I did use your post as an excuse to pound out some scriptures though.
People around here need them believe me....
So was I buddy. Maybe you missed that.I was being sarcastic.
I was being sarcastic.
None of your pretend proof texts say angels took human form.A specious assumption disproven by my voluminous postings proving that the TEXT ITSELF is quite beyond refutation proving
that indeed, angelic rebellion, "going after strange flesh" and Nephilim offspring were a fact of Biblical history.
Not sure where you got that idea but I do understand why you feel driven to and must misrepresent and demonizeSo Magenta thinks that this Wadlow fellow is a legit giant and full of wickedness, violence and
evil? So much so that God had to wipe him and all like him off from the face of the earth?![]()
Here are some proof texts that say angels took human form.None of your pretend proof texts say angels took human form.
Of COURSE giants existed after the flood. Genesis 6 itself states exactly that! And there is just massive quantities of text describing this post-flood infestation/manifestation.Not sure where you got that idea but I do understand why you feel driven to and must misrepresent and demonize my position since you do after all deny what Scripture explicitly states in favor of your fairy tales and wishful thinking. Seems you also deny that that giants survived the flood right into modern times. My goodness..![]()
@Magenta :Of COURSE giants existed after the flood. Genesis 6 itself states exactly that! And there is just massive quantities of text describing this post-flood infestation/manifestation.
The Biblical truth is......demonic activities of all sorts HAS happened back before the flood, it WAS happening during the time of Abraham and Moses and Joshua and David. It was happening during the time of Jesus.
All of this demonic and fallen angel mischief and rebellion is an attempt to destroy man and prevent God's planned redemption. A theme that starts from Genesis 3 for pity's sake.
And make no mistake.....it is happening today. And will be THE PRIMARY cause of the end-time judgements and SC Kingdom.
How in the world can you deny the massive DEMONIC FALLEN ANGEL ASSAULT which will happen in the DOTL 70th week so noted in Revelation? How can you deny the Satanic ties to the prophesied "beast" and "false prophet" of Revelation?
How in the world can you deny these verses. Fallen angel demonic and Satanic entities. We have no idea of the extent. But we DO KNOW that fallen angels and demonic hybrids are unquestionably Biblical fact. There is NOT ONE SINGLE verse that indicates AT ALL that mere men were begetting Nephilim. ONLY fallen angels are noted in the text. Nothing could be more clear.
THESE ARE FALLEN ANGELS IN OUT MIDST WHOM WE ENGAGE IN BATTLE.
What do you have to say about that?
Eph 3:10
To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God,
Eph 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
I can see that as a possibility of any of the giants of the past, but can only speculate since the Bible only reveals so much.In regard to Robert Wadlow, I don't think he was one of them. He had a condition known as gigantism in which he had an enlarged pituitary gland that produced too much human growth hormone.
The giants described in the Bible seemed to live a long time. He can't have been one them because people with gigantism tend to die young. Wadlow died when he was only 22. He was a gentle giant from what I've seen and I'm glad his hometown treated him normally like everyone else!
I can see that as a possibility of any of the giants of the past, but can only speculate since the Bible only reveals so much.
Rare recessive traits and birth defects from chromosomal damage can manifest a variety of deformities. I attributed all giants to inbreeding of fallen angels since my pastor taught me that for years. Every time I start over re-reading the Bible I ask questions and hope to glean a little more insight. I have learned a lot from the different points of view.
No worries. I've been on both sides of the isle. I put Wadlow up there.for humor. I think Magenta did too.I wasn't disagreeing with you if you thought I was?
I only said that Robert Wadlow couldn't have been one of the giant's breed because of the characteristics of his abnomality. It doesn't line up with the characteristics of Biblical giants.
I don't have an opinion on Biblical giants. I'm going to ask God about it after this age is over with.
So were the daughters of Cain that ugly? No one would marry them?There is another interpretation of Genesis 6:1 and following that makes more sense given the previous context, which traces the two lineages of Seth and Cain, the "good" and "evil" lines from Adam. Those intermarried, and evil dominated the human race except for Noah and his family.
But you can have similar species mate, producing sterile offspring. So, it was God's design for species to perpetuate themselves, but artificial / unnatural efforts can change that. We have mixed-fruit species, e.g..Such as denying that kind reproduces after kind. Angels are not humankind.
They are of the same KIND, such as lions and tigers, which are FELINES.But you can have similar species mate, producing sterile offspring. So, it was God's design for species to perpetuate themselves, but artificial / unnatural efforts can change that. We have mixed-fruit species, e.g..
They are of the same KIND, such as lions and tigers, which are FELINES.
Or the EQUINE kind as with horses mating with donkeys and producing mules.
Would a zoologist agree with that? And, I also mentioned fruits being mixed to produce new varieties.
Yeah, and there are mules and grapples.![]()
From 1 Corinthians 15:38-40
Yes, equine kinds mating with each other, we covered that already.Yeah, and there are mules and grapples.
A good teacher knows the value of repetition.Yes, equine kinds mating with each other, we covered that already.
No, YOU covered that already. Similar species, but not the same kind. Grapes and apples are certainly not the same kind.Yes, equine kinds mating with each other, we covered that already.