If You Were Engaged or Talking About Marriage, Would You Require Your Potential Spouse to Get An STD Test?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

If You Were Engaged or Talking About Marriage, Would You Want to Get STD Tests First?

  • Yes, I would want both of us to get tested.

    Votes: 6 35.3%
  • No, I wouldn't want for us to get tested.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • I would leave the choice up to my partner.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • I am married and we got tested for STD's before we married.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am married and we didn't get tested, but I wish we would have.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am married and we have never been tested.

    Votes: 4 23.5%
  • I get regular tests on my own even though I'm not seeing anyone.

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • I don't get regular tests on my own and would not get one.

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • I don't get tests now, but would if I met someone who wanted me to.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • I have seen others get tested/not get tested and this is what I observed...

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Total voters
    17
I have never even heard of a man initiating this conversation. When I hear of this it is 100% a demand from women. All of the men in this thread likewise are against/indifferent about it. This is an example of women valuing different things than men. So for women to say “I’m willing so any man should also be willing”. It is not exactly an equal transaction that it is made out to be and it is presented in a manipulative way, “a man should be willing”. As if there is zero chance any information will not be weaponized later, it wouldn’t be kept private. They would be telling everyone at our job, facebook and town square “just to keep other women safe”.

Plus I think there’s more to this than is said. Asking without asking. I don’t know if it’s some power play or a reason to reject someone before being rejected. It sounds like a reasonable demand, which it is, up until it is presented in this way.

So what is the male equivalent? What is valuable to a man other than what a woman normally wouldn’t provide under any circumstance? It’s just a hypothetical in which most woman would say “no man should ask that”. Women feel they should be able to demand information they want while not disclosing things which they choose not to. In reality no secrets should be kept between two getting married.

I’m not saying men do not care, nor that it isn’t important. I don’t believe it is as reasonable a demand as it is presented. It is mearly one of many things that should be discussed. In the 90’s when they started sexualizing kids in school, they were teaching this lie “just as long as you both get tested nothing bad can happen”.



Women dislike condoms more than men, always have.



My college Microbiology had a memorable class which we learned some of these differences. That discussion is probably better for one of your Friday Night chat rooms. :LOL::LOL: Just remember, Front to Back.

Women do need to be careful around anything that can cause birth defects, from the time they are born until they are finished having children. This is because women are born with all the eggs they will ever have and they can be damaged inside the body, years in advance. The male counterpart is refreshed like every 3 days…
Dude. This is wrong in so many ways.

Two possibilities:

1. You are full of it.

2. You don't know very many men at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
Dude. This is wrong in so many ways.

Two possibilities:

1. You are full of it.

2. You don't know very many men at all.

I shouldn’t have to clarify it here.

*Strait men

The fellas you’re hangin around might be interested in more than you think. I lived in TN, never heard a straight guy ask for it.
 
I shouldn’t have to clarify it here.

*Strait men

The fellas you’re hangin around might be interested in more than you think. I lived in TN, never heard a straight guy ask for it.
Even more interesting. So you assert and propound that only gay men would request it?

You are definitely full of it, and maybe deliberately trolling.
 
This seems to be something only women care about, almost exclusively. As if, as long as they don’t get an std/pregnant, dozens of failed relationships have no effect on them. No harm, no foul.

Then there’s probably some girl math that says the body’s without std/pregnancy don’t count and a -1 for any curable disease.

Maybe it’s the average loss to men is so infinitely greater than any std.
I have never even heard of a man initiating this conversation. When I hear of this it is 100% a demand from women. All of the men in this thread likewise are against/indifferent about it. This is an example of women valuing different things than men. So for women to say “I’m willing so any man should also be willing”. It is not exactly an equal transaction that it is made out to be and it is presented in a manipulative way, “a man should be willing”. As if there is zero chance any information will not be weaponized later, it wouldn’t be kept private. They would be telling everyone at our job, facebook and town square “just to keep other women safe”.

Plus I think there’s more to this than is said. Asking without asking. I don’t know if it’s some power play or a reason to reject someone before being rejected. It sounds like a reasonable demand, which it is, up until it is presented in this way.

So what is the male equivalent? What is valuable to a man other than what a woman normally wouldn’t provide under any circumstance? It’s just a hypothetical in which most woman would say “no man should ask that”. Women feel they should be able to demand information they want while not disclosing things which they choose not to. In reality no secrets should be kept between two getting married.

I’m not saying men do not care, nor that it isn’t important. I don’t believe it is as reasonable a demand as it is presented. It is mearly one of many things that should be discussed. In the 90’s when they started sexualizing kids in school, they were teaching this lie “just as long as you both get tested nothing bad can happen”.



Women dislike condoms more than men, always have.



My college Microbiology had a memorable class which we learned some of these differences. That discussion is probably better for one of your Friday Night chat rooms. :LOL::LOL: Just remember, Front to Back.

Women do need to be careful around anything that can cause birth defects, from the time they are born until they are finished having children. This is because women are born with all the eggs they will ever have and they can be damaged inside the body, years in advance. The male counterpart is refreshed like every 3 days…

I shouldn’t have to clarify it here.

*Strait men

The fellas you’re hangin around might be interested in more than you think. I lived in TN, never heard a straight guy ask for it.


I've been thinking a lot about your posts.

* In saying that you've only heard of women being concerned about this issue/asking for tests and not straight men, I have to wonder how many straight men are sitting around telling each other they're going to ask their fiancee for an STD test. I'm guessing that just because they haven't mentioned it, that doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

* I think it also might have to do with the general fact (and I say that loosely, not as an absolute) that women tend to be more concerned about their health than men. After all, even in the church, it's emphasized that women are "the weaker sex," and that can translate into taking women taking more health precautions because we know we're more vulnerable to some things than men.

A lot of straight men don't even wash their hands after going to the restroom, let alone get regular health checks. Not that every woman washes her hands either, but I'm guessing a lot more guys forego the soap and water than women, especially if they're not taking children to the bathroom with them.

* Men are culturally taught to be strong and show no weaknesses, therefore, I'm guessing many men just don't bother going in for regular health check-ups in general (let's assume everyone had equal access to them.)

If we took a poll here, I wonder how many men vs. how many women go in for annual checkups? (Again, IF they had access, as I know in the USA, health insurance has become an unaffordable luxury.)

I just Googled the infamous "turn your head and cough" test, and it said men should have this done every 1-3 years. How many men actually go in for these kinds of checkups -- willingly?

* If we took another poll asking how many men vs. women go to the doctor regularly, what would it look like if we asked how many men would say they go willingly, or only because their wives or someone else pushed them to go? In other words, how many men vs. women go by their own choice, and not because someone else is nagging them to do so?

STD's aren't the only ailments that can show no symptoms while silently doing a lot of damage -- blood pressure and diabetes ranks up there as well as only being determined through medical evaluation, but many people don't get tested, so they don't know (and don't want to know.)

My point is, maybe you haven't heard of (straight, as you emphasized) men asking for STD tests because in general, men are taught to try to put on the appearance of being invincible, and in general, choose less testing and scrutiny about their health as a whole. I can't imagine many manly men sitting around talking about the risks of STD's (though I wish that would happen) because they want to keep up the appearance of being invincible.

I'm not saying I agree with this (I think men should absolutely be taught it's ok to take care of themselves and ask for help,) but I do suspect that you not hearing talk about this among men is not just about STD's, but about the differences in how men and women approach preventative health care in general.

I could be wrong, but it's what I've witnessed in the men I've been around ("No, it's nothing, I'm ok, and no, I'm not going to get it checked out.")
 
* If we took another poll asking how many men vs. women go to the doctor regularly, what would it look like if we asked how many men would say they go willingly, or only because their wives or someone else pushed them to go? In other words, how many men vs. women go by their own choice, and not because someone else is nagging them to do so?
Haha, I know I wouldn't do much society stuff like that unless I had my other half nagging me to do so..💭❤️

But, my other half is someone who's uptight, loves the thrill of discovery and adventure, although they can hermit, and doesn't really care about what society is thinking or doing.
I'm someone who has a very 'if you know you know' mindset, and I'd like a part of the relationship with my partner to be something like two people in trench coats & fedoras exchanging forbidden information with each other in a back alley.

I highly doubt that the person compatible with that would leave any concern about STDs between us, but you never know when 'You were pricked by something that had a stranger's blood on it!'
 
  • Pray
Reactions: seoulsearch
To pre-empt this, public health in my country now vaccinate girls and boys against the HPV (herpes) which provides them protection so they don't contract it.
it's called Gardisil and funded and free to everyone under age 26, the best age to get the first does is 11-12 before puberty starts.

I am past the cut off age and it was never available when I was 11-12, but I do remember getting other vaccinations - rubella, measles, chicken pox etc.

For those of you anti-vaxxers...I guess you wanna take the risk, or perhaps you think everyone else is as pure as driven snow.
 
I will not go into Covid and RAT testing..come on that was worse, you could die from it, and you didn't contract it by sexual intimacy or kissing, you could contract it by just breathing!!!

If you refuse to take a test just cos you don't want to know or don't think you could ever spread germs to anyone else, you have another think coming.
 
To pre-empt this, public health in my country now vaccinate girls and boys against the HPV (herpes) which provides them protection so they don't contract it.
it's called Gardisil and funded and free to everyone under age 26, the best age to get the first does is 11-12 before puberty starts.

I am past the cut off age and it was never available when I was 11-12, but I do remember getting other vaccinations - rubella, measles, chicken pox etc.

For those of you anti-vaxxers...I guess you wanna take the risk, or perhaps you think everyone else is as pure as driven snow.

This is yet another incidence where I really miss the Informative reaction emoji.

It's really interesting to hear what's going on in other countries.

I believe they have something similar in the US, but since I don't have anyone I look after in the age range, I'm not sure what the details are.

I have read though that some infections are so common without people knowing they have them that they are automatically tested for at annual exams.

Others, like HIV, you have to ask for and consent to.

But the automatic testing for common STD's wasn't a part of exams when I was growing up.
 
I think Cervical screening is happening for women but I am not sure what age it starts from. You have to do a screen every 5 years, or maybe every year if you are sexually active and concerned. The doctor will remind you, or you get a letter from public health.

I don't know about the men, obvs cos I am not one.

A lot of women get put off being tested because, like the covid test where they put a stick up your nostril, the ladies cervical screening is in a private area, and it can be a bit painful and embarassing. But you can ask for a lady doctor, I always did.

Cervical cancer or ovarian cancer is no joke. Also infertility is terrible for women who really want a child. The Bible was all about God opening the wombs of the barren, but if you try to do it yourself its painful...and expensive. Back in the day, Rachel and Leah took fertility drugs - mandrakes, to bear children. Rachel couldn't, but Leah could. Rachel DIED in childbirth.

Let that sink in.
 
Ok let me put it in another perspective just for a min ... A person who wasn't raised Christian yet is an honest and loyal partner to whom she is with let's say in a committed relationship 9 years and she finds out that he has cheated with female escorts and goes to get tested finding she has something not of her own doing .... Is she then tainted even when she is up front is she then untouchable.... Just a question with a spin on the scenario
 
Honestly, this is something to ask your GP/gynacologist/urologist.

Why would you discuss a private matter like that here?
As far as I know, churches aren't the ones administering cervical smears/STD tests. Or you go to Planned Parenthood.
 
In the late 80's and early 90's, I believe everybody had to get have an HIV test done before marriage. That is my understanding from what my dad told me. I don't think HIV or any STI infections are soaring through the Christian community though. Just my opinion.
 
Honestly, this is something to ask your GP/gynacologist/urologist.

Why would you discuss a private matter like that here?
As far as I know, churches aren't the ones administering cervical smears/STD tests. Or you go to Planned Parenthood.
Health Department would be better than Planned Parenthood, any use of their services helps them request more federal funding, and they murder hundreds of thousand unborn children each year with a good chunk of their money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HealthAndHappiness
Health Department would be better than Planned Parenthood, any use of their services helps them request more federal funding, and they murder hundreds of thousand unborn children each year with a good chunk of their money.
Whatever Family Planning thing is called in your country I don't know, a lot of people can't afford private care. And public care you may have to wait a long time to be seen.

What I do know is that IVF costs a lot of money and nobody but the rich/well off can afford that.
 
I mean if it's urgent you could always go to ED, and get help, if you really in that much pain.
I'm sure nothing phases them. Plus they won't spread gossip through the church, as patient records would be confidential.

Back in the day, when people were dying of AIDs, the parents of the sufferers often didn't even want to acknowledge them, and many had to use hospice services as hospitals wouldn't take them..hospices aren't funded by govts, well not in my country they rely on charity. As far as I know, hospice has always been non-denominational, and no matter what you believe, hospice nurses and support teams would provide free care.
 
In the late 80's and early 90's, I believe everybody had to get have an HIV test done before marriage. That is my understanding from what my dad told me. I don't think HIV or any STI infections are soaring through the Christian community though. Just my opinion.
You believe?
Your dad told you?
Or is it just your opinion.

How about get the facts? Call the health department, talk to a nurse, read a peer reviewed Health Journal.
 
One time, I was a new Christian, and a Christian couple invited me to their church thing, and went to pick me up with their car. Their car was a really old rustbucket. I was a bit afraid to ride in it, cos it had a hole in the floor and you could see the road.

Also the seatbelts didn't work.
I was told to hold on and not worry, as they didn't have insurance, they just trusted God would get us there safely.