It means our fleshly nature is satan, if you can see it, most do notWould this mean a man controlled by Satan?
It means our fleshly nature is satan, if you can see it, most do notWould this mean a man controlled by Satan?
It means our fleshly nature is satan, if you can see it, most do not![]()
Most try to interpret the scripture literally.Agreed. Not sure why some deny but I've heard it said myself.
As they should. Satan is not a metaphor.Most try to interpret the scripture literally.
In my opinion, whom Isaiah 14:12 is referring to as Lucifer is the beasts new world order, which at first will have the whole faithless world loving its system, but at the end falls apart.What year was Lucifer denied access to heaven?
What year was Lucifer denied access to heaven?
Actually Lucifer is Jesus, Lucifer means the Bright and Morning Star- which Jesus is. That passage is speaking sarcastically, and is often misinterpreted. It is as if I said to someone “Roll out a red carpet for to walk.” And they replied “Oh yes Queen OneFaith, would you like me to feed you grapes as well? You think you are royal, but you are no better than I.”
As for what year Satan was kicked out of heaven, I don’t know how long Adam and Eve had lived on the earth before they sinned, but Satan fell to the earth sometime between creation and Adam and Eve’s first bite of the forbidden fruit.
Most try to interpret the scripture literally.
[video=youtube;fUamaI1BlYQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUamaI1BlYQ&sns=em[/video]Wrong teacher. Sorry. Brb
It means our fleshly nature is satan, if you can see it, most do not![]()
Agreed. Not sure why some deny but I've heard it said myself.
What year was Lucifer denied access to heaven?
We have Lucipher as Jesus: our fleshly nature is Satan . . . ??? What next?
Hang on tight - this could get really good (bad?) . . .
Someone please write a long epistle and straighten this thread out . . .
We have Lucipher as Jesus: our fleshly nature is Satan . . . ??? What next?
Hang on tight - this could get really good (bad?) . . .
Someone please write a long epistle and straighten this thread out . . .
This is precisely the problem when scripture is taken out of it's context and the eisegesis takes over.
There is no logical reason to take Isa 14:12 out of the context and Nebuchadnezzar and claim that the prophet is waxing eloquently about the "fall of satan".