Modern Relationships and Lindsey Clancy Case. 3 Children Strangled. Overwhelming Support From Females and Male Backlash.

[ZNP]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2090520488107761899

Comedians, let the memes begin!

 

[ZNP]

Exactly, the more we investigate, the more it stinks, especially in the details. Like, how long does it take to strangle three children to death, and does an alleged male command voice taking over to the point where Lindsay is a robot with no agency explain it all? Then the voice disappears altogether? Then we have the coherent call with hubby during the 'psychotic break.' These indicative of agency. Lindsay cognizant before, briefly during, (phone call) and after the murders. Lindsay baby blues and mental health allegedly declined after the birth of her third child who was 8 months old when strangled to death with a cord. Did the amount of time it took to strangle the baby decrease relative to the time it took to strangle the other two?

It takes at least 5 minutes to be absolutely sure someone is dead, and likely one or two minutes before you have cut the air off. So while she is strangling the first child the other two will have to wait their turns. Some pretty horrific things can happen while you strangle a person depending on how you do it. Now if she wants to claim a psychotic break she would not have prepared a garrote but would have used something that was right there, so you can assume the process would be clumsier, uglier, and more terrifying for the children. You would have to start with the oldest as they are the one who would be most difficult to catch and biggest chance of running away.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Ms.Clancy's Attorney on Good Morning America, this morning.

 

[Bible_Locket]

One doctor prescribed her 23 different medications? I didn't know that was possible.

And fathers of three children are also partly responsible for driving their wives to murder? Growing up I had a friend who had 16 brothers and sisters (Catholic). I had no idea his father was virtually a serial killer.

The guy who wrote cheaper by the dozen lived in my town, I guess his father must have wound up in prison for murder, he didn't mention that in the book.

It should have read 13 medications.Not 23.

 

[Bible_Locket]

You've made an assumption. According to reports, she was not depressed for years.

You've jumped to a conclusion.
I was talking about her hormones activity during all three pregnancies. With but three months and 7 months respectively between the oldest and middle child where her body was not impregnated.

She described herself as healthy and happy until the birth of her third child, which is when she claims her anxiety and depression started.

Yes. However her hormones were still at issue.

She started meds only 3 months before the murders. She had 13 prescriptions from various sources, but only "took a fraction of those". They know which prescriptions were filled and the number of pills missing from each bottle, and it was not a large amount. LINK LINK

Doesn't have to be. Half life.And the "mental health counselor" is named in the civil suit due to her actions with Ms.Clancy's case.

The wording here is very strange. Are you saying she was forced to become pregnant by her husband?

You're wording is uncalled for.
I said what I said. The time frame of the pregnancies show,he continued to get her pregnant. The second time,just three months after she had her first baby.
Any OBGYN will tell you that's not wise.

And with the last child,he impregnated her 7 months after she delivered the second baby.

You infer force. That's very strange.

 

[Bible_Locket]

It takes at least 5 minutes to be absolutely sure someone is dead, and likely one or two minutes before you have cut the air off. So while she is strangling the first child the other two will have to wait their turns. Some pretty horrific things can happen while you strangle a person depending on how you do it. Now if she wants to claim a psychotic break she would not have prepared a garrote but would have used something that was right there, so you can assume the process would be clumsier, uglier, and more terrifying for the children. You would have to start with the oldest as they are the one who would be most difficult to catch and biggest chance of running away.

Ghoulish.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Oh, they are making up stuff? That I do know is possible.

It was a typo.
Don't ever imply I'm a liar.

 

[Bible_Locket]

You appear to, like many of her supporters, be making things up.

She did not, at any point, have 23 different medications. She also, at no point, had all her prescriptions from a single doctor. She had 13 medications. Most she stopped within a day or two of beginning them, giving them no time to see if they worked. Several she did not take at all. The prescriptions came from various doctors. Indeed, the entire thing points further to premeditation. She was shopping around for a diagnosis that would let her get away with this. She shopped around for medications to bolster this, and didn't share information between doctors, and hid information from doctors. She was on a total of two, at low therapeutic levels, when she killed her kids.

It was a system typo.


IT SHOULD HAVE READ,AND WAS INITIALLY WRITTEN AS 13 MEDICATIONS.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Comedians, let the memes begin!

Only the lowest life forms make jokes about a dog killer and now, presume and invite jokes and memes about Ms.Clancy.

You're feigned outrage regarding her lost babies and their murders is exposed. As is the case with Lightbeamrider.

 

[Bible_Locket]

I was watching Reels on Facebook and one man was talking about the case. He said "don't scroll, just stop". I stopped and he counted off the time she took to kill each one. He didn't say a word just let the time go silently by. Then he said, " ok, the little girl is probably unconcious by now, she does this two more times. smh He'd have made a good lawyer for the defense.

That man you allegedly saw, is a sick depraved ghoul.

 

[ZNP]

Only the lowest life forms make jokes about a dog killer and now, presume and invite jokes and memes about Ms.Clancy.

You're feigned outrage regarding her lost babies and their murders is exposed. As is the case with Lightbeamrider.

Only a liar would twist what I said. There is a woman who was outraged that a woman in Trump's cabinet killed a dog. This same woman is supporting a woman who killed 3 children. The memes are going to be about this woman podcaster. The hypocrisy is off the charts, just like someone who accuses everyone else of being a liar, but then when she posts that someone prescribed 23 medications which people question since it wasn't true is outraged that anyone might imply that she is a liar.

 

[ThereRoseaLamb]

That man you allegedly saw, is a sick depraved ghoul.

I don't think he meant it that way.

 

[ThereRoseaLamb]

Ghoulish.

IDK her lawyer has just asked President Trump to pardon her. No ladylike way for me to say this, that takes some balls. Then he mentioned what she had been through he thought she deserved a pardon. Three lives, they will never graduate college, never get married, never have children of their own, no grandchildren. Their loved ones will never get to experience those special moments with their grandkids, nephews, niece. This is a hard story all the way round. But a asking a pardon, I think that is, I don't even have the words. Arrogant is one that comes to mind.

 

[ZNP]

I don't think he meant it that way.

if you have a criminal trial and the woman claims she didn't know what she was doing and had a psychotic break and that is why she strangled 3 kids you would demonstrate to the jury exactly what she did do so that they could see for themselves how believable that was. For example, you would assume that the oldest who was 5 would have run out the house if she saw her mother was strangling her siblings. By saying "the other two would have to wait their turn" it points out that this almost certainly could only have been done if she strangled the 5 year old first. That in turn implies she was not having a psychotic break and was thinking clearly.

What is "ghoulish" is the idea we would have a trial where determining who killed the 3 children and how is the central focus, but rather making the killer the "victim" of this. That is the Biblical version of saying evil is good and good is evil.

Yes, it is common and standard practice for a prosecutor to walk the jury through the defendant's version of events during a murder trial. However, the way they do it is strategic: they demonstrate the suspect's claim specifically to pick it apart and show that it contradicts the physical evidence.

 

[ZNP]

if you have a criminal trial and the woman claims she didn't know what she was doing and had a psychotic break and that is why she strangled 3 kids you would demonstrate to the jury exactly what she did do so that they could see for themselves how believable that was. For example, you would assume that the oldest who was 5 would have run out the house if she saw her mother was strangling her siblings. By saying "the other two would have to wait their turn" it points out that this almost certainly could only have been done if she strangled the 5 year old first. That in turn implies she was not having a psychotic break and was thinking clearly.

What is "ghoulish" is the idea we would have a trial where determining who killed the 3 children and how is the central focus, but rather making the killer the "victim" of this. That is the Biblical version of saying evil is good and good is evil.

Yes, it is common and standard practice for a prosecutor to walk the jury through the defendant's version of events during a murder trial. However, the way they do it is strategic: they demonstrate the suspect's claim specifically to pick it apart and show that it contradicts the physical evidence.

For example, the three children were found in the basement. Suppose she went up to the second floor brought one child down to the basement and strangled them, then went up to get the second and then the third. (I don't know the details, but this would make sense for someone who didn't want to scare the kids causing them to run away and hide). This would make it very hard for me to believe that she was having a psychotic break with reality. This is cold, calculating, and not consistent with a psychotic break. You could then have someone familiar with the Behavioral analysis of a psychotic break in a murder scene describe what you would see and compare this to what actually happened.

 

[NightTwister]

And with the last child, he impregnated her 7 months after she delivered the second baby.

You understand that's how it works with married couples, right? They have sex and sometimes the wife gets pregnant.

 

[ZNP]

You understand that's how it works with married couples, right? They have sex and sometimes the wife gets pregnant.

It is hysterical. "He impregnated her 7 months after she delivered the second baby" which means the third child is 18 months younger than the first. Think of how common that is. Also think how strange it is the way she said it implying the two children were seven months apart which would very hard rather than 18 months apart which is very common.

 

[BasedLutheran]

It was a system typo.


IT SHOULD HAVE READ,AND WAS INITIALLY WRITTEN AS 13 MEDICATIONS.

As I noted even that wasn't true, as they were prescribed by a variety of doctors, not one like you claimed. So did you do two typos? Or did you just get your facts wrong and are now trying to backpedal? And again as I stated, she was shopping around for a diagnosis and a variety of medicines to try to build this defense for what she was planning.

 

[BasedLutheran]

For example, the three children were found in the basement. Suppose she went up to the second floor brought one child down to the basement and strangled them, then went up to get the second and then the third. (I don't know the details, but this would make sense for someone who didn't want to scare the kids causing them to run away and hide). This would make it very hard for me to believe that she was having a psychotic break with reality. This is cold, calculating, and not consistent with a psychotic break. You could then have someone familiar with the Behavioral analysis of a psychotic break in a murder scene describe what you would see and compare this to what actually happened.

She also deliberately arated the boy and strangled him in the father's office, which she knew would particularly horrify her husband who was best buds with his son. She did this deliberately, with cruelty in mind.

 

[Bible_Locket]

IDK her lawyer has just asked President Trump to pardon her. No ladylike way for me to say this, that takes some balls. Then he mentioned what she had been through he thought she deserved a pardon. Three lives, they will never graduate college, never get married, never have children of their own, no grandchildren. Their loved ones will never get to experience those special moments with their grandkids, nephews, niece. This is a hard story all the way round. But a asking a pardon, I think that is, I don't even have the words. Arrogant is one that comes to mind.

I think Mr.Reddington did that so to galvanized herocal supporters to petition their Governor to pardon her.

Or,to also perhaps hope President Trump will reach out to the Governor.

Mr.Reddington knows a president cannot pardon someone in a Sate trial.