NEW CC Perspectives on Levels of Conspiracy & Corruption in 2020 Election, CV19 & DS Existence
- Thread starter Solemateleft
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Just more and more WINNING WAYS to ensure that the MID-TERMS are SAFE!!! Thanks to SCOTUS decision allowing NON-Elected Agency Employees to be FIRED!!!
𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐒 𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐇 𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐓 𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐒, 𝐏𝐔𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐑𝐄𝐏𝐔𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍—𝐄𝐀𝐂 𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐑𝐔𝐌
𝐀𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.
The federal agency that certifies America’s voting machines just got cleared out — and the Supreme Court handed Trump the legal cover to do it.
On July 9, the White House fired Democrat 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 commissioners Thomas Hicks and Benjamin Hovland by email, then asked the lone Republican, Christy McCormick, to resign by phone. The 𝐄𝐀𝐂 — created by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to certify voting systems, accredit testing labs, and maintain the national voter registration form — now has zero sitting commissioners and can’t legally act on anything.
The legal basis is 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘷. 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳, decided 𝟔 𝐭𝐨 𝟑 on June 29, which gutted the 90-year-old 𝘏𝘶𝘮𝘱𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘺’𝘴 𝘌𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘳 precedent and stripped for-cause removal protections from independent agency heads. The White House put it plainly: “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘉𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢’𝘴 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘰.”
Hicks, fired without so much as a phone call, told reporters: “𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘙𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘢, 𝘊𝘶𝘣𝘢, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘦𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘥.” Democrats and the Brennan Center called it an attack on an “𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺.”
Funny how the guardrail only sounds sacred once it stops working for them. No replacements have been nominated ten days later — the commission still can’t act, right as the SAVE Act fight over voter ID heats up ahead of the midterms.
𝐀𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.
𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐒 𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐇 𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐓 𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐒, 𝐏𝐔𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐑𝐄𝐏𝐔𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍—𝐄𝐀𝐂 𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐑𝐔𝐌
𝐀𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.
M.A. Rothman
𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐒 𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐇 𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐓 𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐒, 𝐏𝐔𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐑𝐄𝐏𝐔𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍—𝐄𝐀𝐂 𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐑𝐔𝐌The federal agency that certifies America’s voting machines just got cleared out — and the Supreme Court handed Trump the legal cover to do it.
On July 9, the White House fired Democrat 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 commissioners Thomas Hicks and Benjamin Hovland by email, then asked the lone Republican, Christy McCormick, to resign by phone. The 𝐄𝐀𝐂 — created by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to certify voting systems, accredit testing labs, and maintain the national voter registration form — now has zero sitting commissioners and can’t legally act on anything.
The legal basis is 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘷. 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳, decided 𝟔 𝐭𝐨 𝟑 on June 29, which gutted the 90-year-old 𝘏𝘶𝘮𝘱𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘺’𝘴 𝘌𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘳 precedent and stripped for-cause removal protections from independent agency heads. The White House put it plainly: “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘉𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢’𝘴 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘰.”
Hicks, fired without so much as a phone call, told reporters: “𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘙𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘢, 𝘊𝘶𝘣𝘢, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘦𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘥.” Democrats and the Brennan Center called it an attack on an “𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺.”
Funny how the guardrail only sounds sacred once it stops working for them. No replacements have been nominated ten days later — the commission still can’t act, right as the SAVE Act fight over voter ID heats up ahead of the midterms.
𝐀𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐯𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.
KAROLINE LEAVITT SAYS ABC AND NBC WILL FACE THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT FOR VIOLATING THE 1972 ON-AIR BROADCAST CHARTER BY REFUSING TO AIR THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS — THEY WILL PAY DEARLY!This is the hammer coming down.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made it crystal clear: ABC and NBC violated the On-Air Broadcast Charter of 1972, and they will face the full weight of the United States Government for it. They will pay dearly.
These networks get their airtime for free from the American people with one simple responsibility — to serve the public interest. Refusing to broadcast a presidential address is a direct violation of that long-standing agreement.
They chose politics over their legal and moral obligation. Now the consequences are coming.
Coca-Cola and General Motors already pulled their ads. The government is next. ABC and NBC are about to learn that you don’t get to take the public’s airwaves and then refuse to use them when it actually matters.
The free ride is over.
Share this everywhere so every network that thinks they can ignore the President sees what real accountability looks like!
From what I understand, only the DEI provision was struck down; which I guess isnt a horrible result. I'm not a huge fan of "severability"- I dont think the courts should be allowed to strike down only 'parts' of laws... but it is what it is.
Speaking of Sharia Law.
UNBELIEVABLE: Male Passenger Invokes Sharia Law to Refuse Sitting Next to Woman, Then Attacks Female Flight Attendant * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft
A 29-year-old Turkish migrant living in Germany refused to sit next to a woman on a flight because of Sharia law, then punched or slapped the female flight…
www.thegatewaypundit.com
I posted this 3 Years Ago - but I still like it... 
All about 'proving' your Loyalties and 'earning' your Rights to stay...
All about 'proving' your Loyalties and 'earning' your Rights to stay...
Boom!!!
Biden's DOJ pushed for a Combative Raid on Trump's House - that the FBI RESISTED!!!
: The FBI didn’t want to raid President Trump’s house, but AG Merrick Garland overruled them
By doing this, Garland authorized the use of deadly force
He knew exactly what he was doing
He wanted a shootout in Mar a Lago
This psycho belongs in prison."
Via @DrcharlieWardQ on X
Biden's DOJ pushed for a Combative Raid on Trump's House - that the FBI RESISTED!!!
Linda Traitz
"BREAKING
By doing this, Garland authorized the use of deadly force
He knew exactly what he was doing
He wanted a shootout in Mar a Lago
This psycho belongs in prison."
Via @DrcharlieWardQ on X
Their systemic Cheating is rampant and they have it down to means of practice with process efficiency...
I am always amazed at the volumes of people who have been IN ON THE WHOLE DECEPTION all these years who have been living amongst us seemingly normal law abiding citizens...
I am always amazed at the volumes of people who have been IN ON THE WHOLE DECEPTION all these years who have been living amongst us seemingly normal law abiding citizens...
BUMP!!!
CNN just admitted on-air what its own executives were trying to avoid saying out loud: they didn’t want the sitting president speaking live and unedited where the public could hear him without a filter first.
A CNN media analyst, explaining why NBC, ABC and CNN all declined to carry President Trump’s primetime election-integrity address live, didn’t dress it up: “𝘚𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱’𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘤𝘩 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭, 𝘶𝘯𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢.”
The analyst argued the networks were being responsible, not censoring anyone, noting all three newsrooms “𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘤𝘩, 𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘺” and then reported on it afterward, with context and fact-checks attached. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟.
That’s the tell. A speech from the President of the United States, on a matter of election security, was treated as too risky to broadcast unedited — requiring three separate networks to pre-screen and “𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦” it before anyone was allowed to hear it directly. Trump has openly called for the FCC to pull licenses over the blackout; whatever the merits of that fight, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐝.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞.
M.A. Rothman
𝐂𝐍𝐍 𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐘𝐒𝐓 𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐓𝐒 𝐍𝐄𝐓𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊 𝐄𝐗𝐄𝐂𝐒 𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏’𝐒 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐄𝐂𝐇 𝐁𝐄𝐂𝐀𝐔𝐒𝐄 𝐈𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐒 ’𝐃𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐒’CNN just admitted on-air what its own executives were trying to avoid saying out loud: they didn’t want the sitting president speaking live and unedited where the public could hear him without a filter first.
A CNN media analyst, explaining why NBC, ABC and CNN all declined to carry President Trump’s primetime election-integrity address live, didn’t dress it up: “𝘚𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱’𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘤𝘩 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭, 𝘶𝘯𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢.”
The analyst argued the networks were being responsible, not censoring anyone, noting all three newsrooms “𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘤𝘩, 𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘺” and then reported on it afterward, with context and fact-checks attached. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟.
That’s the tell. A speech from the President of the United States, on a matter of election security, was treated as too risky to broadcast unedited — requiring three separate networks to pre-screen and “𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦” it before anyone was allowed to hear it directly. Trump has openly called for the FCC to pull licenses over the blackout; whatever the merits of that fight, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐝.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞.
Bump!!!
It’s one thing to declassify the evidence. Thursday night, President Trump went further and put the officials who buried it on notice.
“𝘛𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘐’𝘮 𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘖𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘉𝘐, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘐𝘈 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘯, 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳-𝘶𝘱, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴, 𝘪𝘧 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦, 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦.”
𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝. 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝. 𝐏𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐝. Four separate federal agencies, ordered by the President himself, to turn over every rock on who sat on evidence of foreign election interference, and why.
Trump’s framing: concealing China’s meddling was only the opening act. The same batch of documents, he says, shows officials also knew for years that electronic voting machines and ballot-counting systems were 𝐯𝐮𝐥𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 and stayed quiet about it.
An accusation is not a conviction, and a DOJ referral doesn’t guarantee a single indictment. But a sitting president publicly ordering his own intelligence community to investigate itself for a cover-up is not a Tuesday.
𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐤𝐧𝐞𝐰. 𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭.
M.A. Rothman
𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐎𝐑𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐃𝐎𝐉 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐂𝐈𝐀 𝐓𝐎 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐄—𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐅𝐈𝐋𝐄 𝐂𝐑𝐈𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐒—𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑-𝐔𝐏It’s one thing to declassify the evidence. Thursday night, President Trump went further and put the officials who buried it on notice.
“𝘛𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘐’𝘮 𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘖𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘉𝘐, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘐𝘈 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘯, 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳-𝘶𝘱, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴, 𝘪𝘧 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦, 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦.”
𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝. 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝. 𝐏𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐝. Four separate federal agencies, ordered by the President himself, to turn over every rock on who sat on evidence of foreign election interference, and why.
Trump’s framing: concealing China’s meddling was only the opening act. The same batch of documents, he says, shows officials also knew for years that electronic voting machines and ballot-counting systems were 𝐯𝐮𝐥𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 and stayed quiet about it.
An accusation is not a conviction, and a DOJ referral doesn’t guarantee a single indictment. But a sitting president publicly ordering his own intelligence community to investigate itself for a cover-up is not a Tuesday.
𝐒𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐤𝐧𝐞𝐰. 𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭.
Bump...
𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐳. 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭.
Iraq signed 𝟒𝟖 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 $𝟔𝟎 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 with American companies during Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s visit to Washington this week, Reuters reports — and the centerpiece is a pipeline designed to make Iran’s chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz irrelevant.
The agreements include rebuilding the long-defunct Iraq-Syria crude oil pipeline, running from the Kirkuk fields in northern Iraq to Syria’s Mediterranean port of Baniyas. Once rehabilitated, the line would carry 𝟐 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐢𝐥 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐚𝐲 without ever touching the Strait. 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐫𝐨𝐧, 𝐄𝐱𝐱𝐨𝐧𝐌𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐥, 𝐒𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐥, 𝐇𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐨𝐧, 𝐊𝐁𝐑 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐆𝐄 𝐕𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚 are all named in the agreements.
U.S. Ambassador Tom Barrack said the pipeline program would make the Strait of Hormuz “𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵”. The deals come as Baghdad moves to escape dependence on a waterway that’s been paralyzed for weeks by the U.S.-Israel war on Iran.
𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐳. 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭.
𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐳. 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭.
M.A. Rothman
𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐐 𝐈𝐍𝐊𝐒 𝟒𝟖 𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐇 $𝟔𝟎 𝐁𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐔.𝐒. 𝐎𝐈𝐋 𝐆𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐒 𝐓𝐎 𝐁𝐘𝐏𝐀𝐒𝐒 𝐇𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐔𝐙Iraq signed 𝟒𝟖 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 $𝟔𝟎 𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 with American companies during Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s visit to Washington this week, Reuters reports — and the centerpiece is a pipeline designed to make Iran’s chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz irrelevant.
The agreements include rebuilding the long-defunct Iraq-Syria crude oil pipeline, running from the Kirkuk fields in northern Iraq to Syria’s Mediterranean port of Baniyas. Once rehabilitated, the line would carry 𝟐 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐢𝐥 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐚𝐲 without ever touching the Strait. 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐫𝐨𝐧, 𝐄𝐱𝐱𝐨𝐧𝐌𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐥, 𝐒𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐥, 𝐇𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐨𝐧, 𝐊𝐁𝐑 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐆𝐄 𝐕𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚 are all named in the agreements.
U.S. Ambassador Tom Barrack said the pipeline program would make the Strait of Hormuz “𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵”. The deals come as Baghdad moves to escape dependence on a waterway that’s been paralyzed for weeks by the U.S.-Israel war on Iran.
𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐇𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐳. 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭.
General Flynn provides an Honest assessment of the Conventional Iranian Ground Forces (different than the IRGC)...
BLUF: This is just another reason that the original Strategy was to avoid BOOTS on the GROUND and a Ground War in Iran... Not just because the majority of people just don't have the stomach for another ground war... As Gen Flynn says: "it will not be a cakewalk."
IMHO, this is where the IRGC was able to re-arm, replenish and re-position missiles from, while they were buying time pretending to negotiate the MOU....
Michael T. Flynn LTG USA (RET)
Jul 20, 2026
There has been little written about the other basic military components of the Iranian military. We’ve heard about their drones, their ballistic missiles, their destroyed navy and Air Force, but little has been written or discussed about the basic military order of battle. To a Soldier, this is an important aspect of an enemy one might face. The conventional Iranian military (not the IRGC) is a substantial part of Iran’s overall military force structure. If we are to conduct ground operations, we will likely face these elements, and despite the challenges of a lack of training or a modern supply system, they will be formidable enemy forces. As the conflict in the Middle East accelerates and the possibility of American ground engagement grows more certain, we cannot afford to engage the enemy with incomplete intelligence about his true order of battle.
What follows is a strategic assessment of Iran’s conventional military forces, their structure, and their capabilities.
Iran’s conventional army (the Artesh Ground Forces / Islamic Republic of Iran Ground Forces) is sized for large-scale territorial defense, with substantial numerical strength in manpower, armor, and especially artillery, though much of the equipment is aging.
Manpower
Overall Assessment
The Artesh Ground Forces emphasize quantity, defensive depth, and artillery mass over high-end mobility or technological sophistication. Heavy conventional armor and artillery are primarily assigned to the Artesh rather than the IRGC. Equipment modernization has been incremental (local upgrades to T-72s, M60s, and indigenous designs like Karrar/Zulfiqar), constrained by sanctions. Recent air and missile-centric conflicts in 2025–2026 appear to have left the ground force structure and heavy equipment largely intact, as there was no large-scale ground campaign.
Figures are estimates drawn from open sources (IISS Military Balance citations, Global Firepower aggregates, detailed equipment lists, and order-of-battle analyses). Exact serviceable numbers, ammunition stocks, and training levels are not publicly confirmed and vary by unit.
This is all to say, if the president decides to conduct a ground invasion, it will not be a cakewalk. While the U.S. Military is well trained, the size of the Iranian conventional forces, their dedication to their ideological cause and the local knowledge of the terrain and environment offers them significant advantages.
READ MORE
BLUF: This is just another reason that the original Strategy was to avoid BOOTS on the GROUND and a Ground War in Iran... Not just because the majority of people just don't have the stomach for another ground war... As Gen Flynn says: "it will not be a cakewalk."
IMHO, this is where the IRGC was able to re-arm, replenish and re-position missiles from, while they were buying time pretending to negotiate the MOU....
General Flynn's Substack - Official
What Iran's Aging Arsenal Tells Us About Its Military StrategyMichael T. Flynn LTG USA (RET)
Jul 20, 2026
There has been little written about the other basic military components of the Iranian military. We’ve heard about their drones, their ballistic missiles, their destroyed navy and Air Force, but little has been written or discussed about the basic military order of battle. To a Soldier, this is an important aspect of an enemy one might face. The conventional Iranian military (not the IRGC) is a substantial part of Iran’s overall military force structure. If we are to conduct ground operations, we will likely face these elements, and despite the challenges of a lack of training or a modern supply system, they will be formidable enemy forces. As the conflict in the Middle East accelerates and the possibility of American ground engagement grows more certain, we cannot afford to engage the enemy with incomplete intelligence about his true order of battle.
What follows is a strategic assessment of Iran’s conventional military forces, their structure, and their capabilities.
Iran’s conventional army (the Artesh Ground Forces / Islamic Republic of Iran Ground Forces) is sized for large-scale territorial defense, with substantial numerical strength in manpower, armor, and especially artillery, though much of the equipment is aging.
Manpower
- Active personnel: Approximately 350,000.
- A large share (roughly 200,000–220,000) consists of conscripts serving limited terms. Professional/volunteer cadres are smaller.
- This forms the bulk of Iran’s conventional ground strength. The IRGC Ground Forces are a parallel, more ideologically oriented force of roughly 150,000–190,000, lighter in heavy equipment and oriented toward internal security, rapid response, and asymmetric/expeditionary roles.
- The total number of active Iranian military personnel is around 610,000.
Overall Assessment
The Artesh Ground Forces emphasize quantity, defensive depth, and artillery mass over high-end mobility or technological sophistication. Heavy conventional armor and artillery are primarily assigned to the Artesh rather than the IRGC. Equipment modernization has been incremental (local upgrades to T-72s, M60s, and indigenous designs like Karrar/Zulfiqar), constrained by sanctions. Recent air and missile-centric conflicts in 2025–2026 appear to have left the ground force structure and heavy equipment largely intact, as there was no large-scale ground campaign.
Figures are estimates drawn from open sources (IISS Military Balance citations, Global Firepower aggregates, detailed equipment lists, and order-of-battle analyses). Exact serviceable numbers, ammunition stocks, and training levels are not publicly confirmed and vary by unit.
This is all to say, if the president decides to conduct a ground invasion, it will not be a cakewalk. While the U.S. Military is well trained, the size of the Iranian conventional forces, their dedication to their ideological cause and the local knowledge of the terrain and environment offers them significant advantages.
READ MORE
NOTHING to SEE HERE?
Can even the Doubting Thomas's NOW SEE the Completely Irregular DATA/FACTS here?
Can even the Doubting Thomas's NOW SEE the Completely Irregular DATA/FACTS here?
BOMBSHELL AUDIO DROP: Pennsylvania election officials were caught on tape admitting they could NOT reconcile the 2020 vote totals — and they were sweating bullets thinking they were about to be hauled away in cuffs.
QThestorm
@17QStorm
BOMBSHELL AUDIO DROP: Pennsylvania election officials were caught on tape admitting they could NOT reconcile the 2020 vote totals — and they were sweating bullets thinking they were about to be hauled away in cuffs.Yet Josh Shapiro certified the results anyway and locked in the overthrow.This wasn’t a “glitch.” This was knowing the numbers didn’t add up and forcing the certification through by pure power. Virtually every Secretary of State who played along got promoted for their role.Listen to them scramble. The fear in their voices is real. The cover-up is real.Patriots — this is the receipts. Share it everywhere before they bury it again.Follow me for more intel drops!
https://x.com/17QStorm/status/2079009812172415359
QThestorm
@17QStorm
BOMBSHELL AUDIO DROP: Pennsylvania election officials were caught on tape admitting they could NOT reconcile the 2020 vote totals — and they were sweating bullets thinking they were about to be hauled away in cuffs.Yet Josh Shapiro certified the results anyway and locked in the overthrow.This wasn’t a “glitch.” This was knowing the numbers didn’t add up and forcing the certification through by pure power. Virtually every Secretary of State who played along got promoted for their role.Listen to them scramble. The fear in their voices is real. The cover-up is real.Patriots — this is the receipts. Share it everywhere before they bury it again.Follow me for more intel drops!https://x.com/17QStorm/status/2079009812172415359
bump...
For three decades, the Alien Terrorist Removal Court sat completely unused — a legal tool Congress created in 1996 specifically to deport noncitizens tied to terrorism while shielding classified intelligence from public disclosure. This week, the Trump administration finally put it to work.
The government submitted the court's 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭-𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 on July 15, seeking the removal of a noncitizen the administration says poses a terrorism-related threat. Chief Judge 𝐉𝐨𝐚𝐧 𝐍. 𝐄𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐬𝐞𝐧 held a hearing the very next day, taking attorney arguments before ordering the government to submit additional supporting analysis by July 22.
The court exists precisely because some deportation cases can't run through ordinary immigration channels — the intelligence involved is too sensitive to expose in a normal courtroom. Congress built it, funded it, and gave it jurisdiction over exactly this kind of case. Then no administration touched it for thirty years.
Until now.
𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟔.
M.A. Rothman
𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝟑𝟎-𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑-𝐎𝐋𝐃 𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐍 𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐑𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐕𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐓 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑For three decades, the Alien Terrorist Removal Court sat completely unused — a legal tool Congress created in 1996 specifically to deport noncitizens tied to terrorism while shielding classified intelligence from public disclosure. This week, the Trump administration finally put it to work.
The government submitted the court's 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭-𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 on July 15, seeking the removal of a noncitizen the administration says poses a terrorism-related threat. Chief Judge 𝐉𝐨𝐚𝐧 𝐍. 𝐄𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐬𝐞𝐧 held a hearing the very next day, taking attorney arguments before ordering the government to submit additional supporting analysis by July 22.
The court exists precisely because some deportation cases can't run through ordinary immigration channels — the intelligence involved is too sensitive to expose in a normal courtroom. Congress built it, funded it, and gave it jurisdiction over exactly this kind of case. Then no administration touched it for thirty years.
Until now.
𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟔.
