Hmmm, good points, but the first verses I thought of reading this a few days ago and now catching fully up was Mark 11:23-24
New Zealand Mountain Gains Personhood
- Thread starter ThereRoseaLamb
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Hmmm, good points, but the first verses I thought of reading this a few days ago and now catching fully up was Mark 11:23-24
Legalistically, this is a geological Jerry Springer Show, a daytime drama etched in stone of News canon, somehow not a conspiracy theory, nope, that mountain is legally a person in NZ so literally this is the current timeline news and politics officially. New Zealand hitting its peak or maybe rock bottom slagged with all these petroglyphic puns.
I believe that Trump believes that everything has a price. It's called The Art of the Deal. That is the name of the book he had published in the 80's. The guy is a businessman who buys and sells. That's what he does.
Mr T can turn a blind eye to sex-trafficking too. I mean it's just what a lot of rich people do, like its totally normal to buy young girls and then use them. They are just sex toys and baby factories to some men.
It kind of would be nice if they had legal personhood too but looks like not gonna happen, especially if people on here keep ridiculing the protection of a mountain.
It kind of would be nice if they had legal personhood too but looks like not gonna happen, especially if people on here keep ridiculing the protection of a mountain.
No one ridiculed the protection, what is wrong and sin is to give a mountain person-hood. With the rights of a human being. You can carry on as much as you like. You're wrong, it's against the Bible and that should matter to a Christian.
Oh I'm definitely going to ridicule the "protection" of the mountain's personhood for sure. I mean seriously think about this, the mountain is a person to protect the pagan religious belief that the mountains are their ancestors and the mountains have a whole like lover's triangle and conflicts of their own. Legalistically one's first reaction be maybe Tongariro could get the government of NZ to legally put a restraining order on Taranaki to prevent him from you know walking across the land to commit adultery with Pihenga. But this opens up an interesting question, what if Taranaki breaks the law and violates said order and actually does walk back across the land to join the other mountains? Like how you gonna enforce that restraining order, how you gonna make him move back or arrest him? Will Tongariro have the right to self-defense?
I didn't say it wasn't a sin
I didn't say it was a sin
I'm saying it was done for protection/conservation reasons. Mountains are sacred places. In the Bible, they can even be holy places. . I am not Maori and don't believe in their mythology, but I understand why they did it.
I live there I should know.
The legal personhood is actually an American piece of legalese you should be concerned about, for yourself and YOUR unborn children not a Mountain you don't live near, have no part of looking after and don't belong to you.
I didn't say it was a sin
I'm saying it was done for protection/conservation reasons. Mountains are sacred places. In the Bible, they can even be holy places. . I am not Maori and don't believe in their mythology, but I understand why they did it.
I live there I should know.
The legal personhood is actually an American piece of legalese you should be concerned about, for yourself and YOUR unborn children not a Mountain you don't live near, have no part of looking after and don't belong to you.
Anyway its a moot point as there IS now legal personhood for unborn babies (or fetal personhood) enacted in some states of the US so you really don't need to cry about it anymore.
legalvoice.org
Legal Fetal Personhood Timeline in the US - Legal Voice
Legal Voice has long tracked extremist efforts to disempower the rights of pregnant people under the guise of legal fetal personhood. This timeline illustrates the history of the legal fetal personhood movement in the U.S.
legalvoice.org
I always wondered why God struck David's innocent son who was never given a name, when he was only 7 days old. It was before he even had a chance to be circumcised - which is meant to be done on the 8th day. So maybe that's why...?
‘Nathan replied, “The Lord has taken away your sin. You are not going to die. But because by doing this you have shown utter contempt for the Lord, the son born to you will die.” After Nathan had gone home, the Lord struck the child that Uriah’s wife had borne to David, and he became ill… On the seventh day the child died.’ (2 Samuel 12.13–15, 18)
‘Nathan replied, “The Lord has taken away your sin. You are not going to die. But because by doing this you have shown utter contempt for the Lord, the son born to you will die.” After Nathan had gone home, the Lord struck the child that Uriah’s wife had borne to David, and he became ill… On the seventh day the child died.’ (2 Samuel 12.13–15, 18)
Jesus even says to Jezebels children that he would strike them dead.
So I suppose any child born of fornication has a death sentence on them
If a mother is married and needs to abort their child because it would endanger her life, I guess she'll try any means. If she's unmarried she probably has no choice in the matter.
There really is no way around it.
Babies born where the mother or parents can't afford to look after them, may have defects or require a lot of care, are simply dropped off in baby boxes in Korea. There was a doco about that. If they didn't have them they'd just be left out in the cold to starve to death.
So I suppose any child born of fornication has a death sentence on them
If a mother is married and needs to abort their child because it would endanger her life, I guess she'll try any means. If she's unmarried she probably has no choice in the matter.
There really is no way around it.
Babies born where the mother or parents can't afford to look after them, may have defects or require a lot of care, are simply dropped off in baby boxes in Korea. There was a doco about that. If they didn't have them they'd just be left out in the cold to starve to death.
It's far worse than that.
You and I are at New Zealand. Are you aware that, as one who claims the rights of Caesar's "citizen-ship," you were BIRTHED DEAD at the dock-tor? Think I'm crazy? Following is what NZ's own "law" (actually, it's an Act - not God's Law) says.
The scam is diabolical, but not difficult to expose. It's the brainwash, the mind control, that is the hard nut to crack.
The vast majority has no idea that "birth" by legal definition is defined as a stillbirth. Below is the definition of the word "birth" as it appears in all New Zealand legislation:
source: NZ Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Act 2021
IOW, you, as a "citizen/person" (legal terms) are declared DEAD AT BIRTH (BTW, "birth" is not the same as "born").
So this is how "they" shifted you from the creditor side to the debtor side. Since contract law states that only like can contract with like, the corporation (a dead thing) must first render you likewise dead (via "stillbirth"). Typically, it's the mother who signed off on the "birth certificate" - a commercial instrument, traded on the stock exchange (because that's what you now are i.e. stock), that allows "them" to steal your labor and God-given "rights" to land, air, water, food...
With doublespeak commercial phrases such as "birthright citizenship" and "personhood," ppl are tricked into arguing for their own demise.
maunga Taranaki made the news again!
This time, not funny as some insane tourists are putting themselves in danger trying to take a instagram pic.
What the?
www.rnz.co.nz
This time, not funny as some insane tourists are putting themselves in danger trying to take a instagram pic.
What the?
Police warn Instagram-worthy picture of Taranaki Maunga not worth the risk
Police are warning tourists and would-be photographers that snapping an Instagram-worthy picture of Taranaki Maunga on a rural road near New Plymouth isn't worth the risk of losing your life.
www.rnz.co.nz