E
eternally-gratefull
Guest
I think his error was asking for just "one" example.![]()
He saved me a lot of work by just asking for one,
ut I see others have helped. so we have many fine examples.
I think his error was asking for just "one" example.![]()
See. More deflection, more accusations. Well this was easy:
We are saying the same thing..wrorks never saved anyone....it is and always will be by faith alone....David and all others in the OT were saved by Jesus sacrifice only....the law was a shadow of what was to come..Jesus
He saved me a lot of work by just asking for one,
ut I see others have helped. so we have many fine examples.
By the way, I just wanted to say, We saw an example of how one should listen and ask question from someone, before you assume you know what they teach and then start falsely slandering them.
It would have been easy for me to start calling Grace777 a double gospel theologian. or following their teachings, Instead I politely asked him to explain,, As did another member, and a lot of hate and division was prevented because we did nto listen to that the other actually believed, we just assumed..
Wow man, you two are OLD!![]()
LOL..now I have to do more repenting...it all started back in a crusade to burn heretics at the stake for believing in grace through faith in Jesus' finished work only...just kidding...it was really December 2015....good catch!
He'd really hate for someone to take the time and go through all of his posts and dig them out. He'd end up looking like a monster.
Of course, none of us are guiltless. We all say similar regrettable things in the heat of debate. At least we admit it, while HeRose claims he has never done that.
Everyone here in this forum believes we are saved by grace, never by our own efforts.
The sticking point is that there are those who believe when being taught to obey God as do children of obedience, there are grace only people who teach this is being under the law. This latter group is wrong; that is all.
Everyone here in this forum believes we are saved by grace, never by our own efforts.
The sticking point is that there are those who believe when being taught to obey God as do children of obedience, there are grace only people who teach this is being under the law. This latter group is wrong; that is all.
A lot say this, but they do not preach it.
I can say I believe I am saved by faith not works till I am blue in he face. If I follow that by proclaiming obedience is required to stay saved, I am teaching works not grace.
Name one. I have yet to see one person claim this.
Again, Why do you refuse to acknowledge that the sticking point is NOT that a child of God should be obedient, The sticking point is those who teach obedience is a natural flow of a person who has been born again, Vs the means by which one is saved (salvation is gained or lost by how obedient we are or are not) Which is legalism.
Obviously you have not been reading the posts, not even the ones to which you reply.
PEACEFUL WARRIOR:
Matthew Henry has this to say about it: "...let Christians labour to attain assurance of their calling, and of their election, by believing and well-doing; and thus carefully to endeavour, is a firm argument of the grace and mercy of God, upholding them so that they shall not utterly fall."
So: Make haste and give careful and persistent study to the qualities previously mentioned. (2 Pet 5-7)
Thanks for your contribution PW.
I can't say I understand Henry's words here any differently than I do Peter's words ... to me they seem to say the same thing?
But you say it is by studying the qualities listed makes our calling and election sure? Yes? Could you elaborate please?
That's all you have?
Why is it when you people are asked questions is this your only comeback?
You lack of a response to goes to prove you have nothing..
I asked reasonable questions. and stated facts. Are you going to answer, or just play the blame game like you always do?
Yes--I think so. I am not saying I am right--just sharing how I understand it.
A warning exists in these verses:
"...whoever lacks these qualities is so nearsighted that he is blind, having forgotten that he was cleansed from his former sins"
This warning is followed by a call-to-action:
"...be all the more diligent to confirm your calling and election, for if you practice these qualities you will never fall"
We are encouraged to 'practice these qualities' so that we do not become blind, forget, and fail. We should desire to seek a 'rich entrance' into the 'eternal kingdom' as "partakers of the divine nature" (verse 5).
Verse 5, in ESV, reads: "For this very reason, make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue (excellence), and virtue with knowledge..."
Peter goes on to say: "Therefore I intend always to remind you of these qualities, though you know them and are established in the truth that you have. 13 I think it right, as long as I am in this body,[h] to stir you up by way of reminder..."
Peter wants all 'brethren' in Christ to have this rich entrance into the Kingdom. It is not clear to me why, at this point, perhaps the reason is as simple as an expression of Peter's Godly love for fellow Believers; Peter has experienced the "riches" God has bestowed on him while still in his earthly 'tent'--what greater riches await those who are 'diligent to confirm their election and calling'!
I think Peter is a great guy........you just need to understand that it SEEMS Peter believes being a great guy gets people to heaven.
One needs to read between the lines and critique a bit........And some of us are. Thus the "victim" thread.
Salvation may be in the balance here......so we should press it.
That image (and virtually every image he posts) comes from the false-grace website that he incessantly proselytizes for. They have a special section with graphics that are devoted to this end.
Here's a perfect example of the poisonous spirit that EG introduces to virtually every thread (IMO) he participates in. Here he has falsely accused me by saying: You do not care what anyone believes, nor do you know. You said it yourself.
In the post he's referring to I told one person this, yet his spirit of a false accuser turned it into a blanket accusation. This is not accidental. This is how he operates for some reason. There is no excuse for Christians doing this.