Ok, as someone who likes research and to get to the bottoms of things, and seeing as Roald Dahl is deceased I can't just write and ask him, I've done a little etymological study, and granted there may be different manifestations of Whangdoodles, the current perception may be a bit more complex than we thought.
Based on the circumstantial evidence.. we have:
1. Hairy monster
2. Toy based on hairy monster
3. Toy thats cloned hairy monster with AI
4. The above but also eats cheese doodles..accounts for the bad teeth as depicted in exhibit C
Literature can be taken as evidence too these stories don't come out of nowhere.
1. Roald Dahl was of Norwegian extraction so, the whangdoodles may have very thick fur since Norway is so cold
2. Julie Andrews seems familiar with them in her children's story books so this needs to be consulted
3. The oompa loompas feared them - where did the oompa loompas come from and did the Whangdoodles invade their land before they were rescured by Mr Wonka to work in his chocolate factory?
4. I looked up Whang in the dictionary...it means to strike or hit something to cause a resounding noise
5. whang also has a second meaning as a leather thong...could it be the whangadoodles need to be muzzled or on a leash? Or are they wearing leather thongs i.e jandals/sandals? Roman type? Gladiator sandals?
6. Do they have these whangs as weapons the way some people say 'you can't handle the jandal" meaning to hit/slap something or someone with a jandal
7. There is a town called Whangarei up north from where I live in Auckland.
8. whangawhanga means caterpillar in Maori... the latin is Ypsolphus liguellus *
My hunch is, those Fuggler or fugly toys made by Zuru (which originated in NZ, alas, not Australian as we first thought) based on these Whangdoodles are a sinsiter way of inflitrating the world via innocent children wanting to play with these 'cute, furry monsters' Well not exactly cute but it seems they are miniature versions of 'Where the Wild Things Are'
*this last note needs to be investigated further..could it be the Whangdoodles start out as caterpillars and then morph into scary beasts like in the movie Cacoon? Or am I remembering it wrong?
Based on the circumstantial evidence.. we have:
1. Hairy monster
2. Toy based on hairy monster
3. Toy thats cloned hairy monster with AI
4. The above but also eats cheese doodles..accounts for the bad teeth as depicted in exhibit C
Literature can be taken as evidence too these stories don't come out of nowhere.
1. Roald Dahl was of Norwegian extraction so, the whangdoodles may have very thick fur since Norway is so cold
2. Julie Andrews seems familiar with them in her children's story books so this needs to be consulted
3. The oompa loompas feared them - where did the oompa loompas come from and did the Whangdoodles invade their land before they were rescured by Mr Wonka to work in his chocolate factory?
4. I looked up Whang in the dictionary...it means to strike or hit something to cause a resounding noise
5. whang also has a second meaning as a leather thong...could it be the whangadoodles need to be muzzled or on a leash? Or are they wearing leather thongs i.e jandals/sandals? Roman type? Gladiator sandals?
6. Do they have these whangs as weapons the way some people say 'you can't handle the jandal" meaning to hit/slap something or someone with a jandal
7. There is a town called Whangarei up north from where I live in Auckland.
8. whangawhanga means caterpillar in Maori... the latin is Ypsolphus liguellus *
My hunch is, those Fuggler or fugly toys made by Zuru (which originated in NZ, alas, not Australian as we first thought) based on these Whangdoodles are a sinsiter way of inflitrating the world via innocent children wanting to play with these 'cute, furry monsters' Well not exactly cute but it seems they are miniature versions of 'Where the Wild Things Are'
*this last note needs to be investigated further..could it be the Whangdoodles start out as caterpillars and then morph into scary beasts like in the movie Cacoon? Or am I remembering it wrong?







