What about this oneYou may be right. How do you feel about onomatopoeia?
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.
Its a genuine word and it's not a tongues.
What about this oneYou may be right. How do you feel about onomatopoeia?
Prove your case.So back up your words, show me how to be saved WITHOUT getting rid of our sins.
Prove JESUS wrong in John 3:5 and Peter in Acts 2:38.
Prove your case.So back up your words, show me how to be saved WITHOUT getting rid of our sins.
Prove JESUS wrong in John 3:5 and Peter in Acts 2:38.
Are you willing to tell me I am not saved because I was not baptised in the name of Jesus and don't speak in tongues?
@OuchAre you willing to tell me I am not saved because I was not baptised in the name of Jesus and don't speak in tongues?
It also appears that the majority of open minded looking for absolute truths scholars and theologians have done the same thing as the Disciples considering they have conglomerately decreed this is their belief from reading and studying the New Testament.JESUS disciples knew to baptize "in the name of" the father the son and the Holy Ghost. Which as we can tell since they baptized in JESUS name. I agree just obey it's not hard.
Prove your case.
WE CANNOT GET RID OF OUR SINS
I would not label obedience as rotten.Then there is the rotten core that adds to saved by grace through faith in order to be saved.
Thing is you don't know the truth.Some people don't like the truth, but it needs to be told.
I am willing to tell you that you can't be saved without getting rid of your sins!!!
And the only way to do that is being baptized in JESUS name. NOT MY RULES.
If you have a problem with HIS rules it's between YOU AND HIM.
In John 3:5 JESUS says we need both, and EVERY recorded acts of someone being filled with the Holy Ghost they spoke in tongues.
Acts 2:4, 8: how did they know whey didn't get it? Acts 10:45-46
what do you think of these two?
Mark 16:16-17
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
Prove your case.
Jesus in 3:5 did not say we should be baptised in his name only.
Show me a verse where VERBALLY he said bpatize in my name only.
Not me.I would not label obedience as rotten.
Thing is you don't know the truth.
And you don't have to balls to be honest and answer my questions.
Therefore baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is a valid mode of baptism?I don't think there is scripture where JESUS said to be baptized in his name only HIS DISCIPLES.
I can't see a response to the question.Did I answer that one?
Here we goDid I answer that one?
I like the go go goch at the end.What about this one
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.
Its a genuine word and it's not a tongues.
I don't know, I was too young to remember.What did you have to do to be born?
wow, two became one to make one. All are one yet three different distinct personsHave parents that were male and female.
Therefore baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is a valid mode of baptism?
Thank you for being honest.